The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Snap i d 2.0 protein detection system

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany

The SNAP i.d.® 2.0 Protein Detection System is a lab equipment product designed for efficient protein detection. It provides a streamlined workflow for Western blotting procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using snap i d 2.0 protein detection system

1

Quantitative Transcriptomic Analysis of GCTB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified total RNA (RNeasy kit, Qiagen) from 22 GCTB fresh frozen biopsies and 13 cell line samples (Supplementary Table S1) were used in the nCounter hybridization-based RNA transcript quantification technology (Nanostring). The validation set contained 12 samples not used in the test set. We had 39 genes designed for the nCounter gene expression custom codeset to validate the identified splicing defects and alternative starting sites seen in the six GCTB cell line sample set.
Western blot analysis was performed with standard PAGE and submarine protein transfer system (BioRad), and detection with the SNAP i.d. 2.0 protein detection system (Merck Millipore). Antibodies used were anti-GFP (ab290, Abcam), and anti-hnRNPA1L2 (ab180124, Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sperm Tyrosine Phosphorylation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sperm were incubated in a 100-μL drop of cTYH for 0 or 60 min. After incubation, the concentration of each sperm suspension was measured using a PiCOSCOPE® (USHIO, Japan) and equalized. Aliquots of the sperm suspension were collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 min. Subsequent to washing with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline, the sperm pellet was resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer and 2-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 5 min. After disruption of sperm sample by ultrasonication for 1 min, SDS-PAGE was performed using Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra Vertical Electrophoresis Cell (Bio-Rad, USA), and proteins were transferred to a Trans-Blot® Turbo Mini PVDF Transfer Pack (Bio-Rad). Western blot analysis was performed using the SNAP i.d.® 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck Millipore, Germany). The protein-transferred membrane was blocked with PO Noise Cancelling Reagents for Phosphoprotein Detection using chemiluminescence or fluorescence techniques (Bløk; Merck Millipore) at room temperature. After removing the blocking solution, the membrane was immunoblotted with a monoclonal antibody against phosphotyrosine (4G10® Platinum, Anti-Phosphotyrosine Antibody; Merck Millipore) for 10 min at room temperature and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 10 min at room temperature. α-Tubulin was used as the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Recombinant Fusion Antigen Expression in Lactobacillus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze expression of recombinant fusion antigen in L. plantarum, cells from a 50 mL culture were harvested 3 h after induction (25 (link), 43 (link)) and resuspended in 500 μL PBS. Bacterial protein extracts were prepared by disruption in FastPrep tubes containing 1.5 g of glass beads (size ≤ 106 μm; Sigma-Aldrich), using a FastPrep® FP120 Cell Disrupter with a shaking speed of 6.5 m/s for 45 s. After 5 min incubation on ice the shaking process was repeated. The glass beads were removed by sedimentation and the protein extracts were transferred to a new tube. Proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 10% Mini-Protean TGX Precast gels (BioRad) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlotTM Dry Blotting System (Invitrogen). The proteins were detected using the SNAP i.d.® 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck) using a specific monoclonal mouse anti-ESAT-6 antibody (Abcam) diluted 1:15000 and, subsequently, a polyclonal HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (DAKO), diluted 1:7500. Proteins were visualized using the SuperSignal™ West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Termo Fisher Scientific) and signals were documented using an Azure c400 system and AzureSpot Analysis Software (Azure Biosystems), following the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting of ADAR Enzymes in Mouse Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue lysates from mouse cerebral cortex and spleen were prepared and stored at −80°C until use as described previously (Miyake et al. 2016 (link)). Lysates were then separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules) and immunoblotted with primary antibodies using a SNAP i.d 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck Millipore) as previously described (Nakahama et al. 2018 (link)). The primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse monoclonal anti-ADAR1 antibody (15.8.6; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse monoclonal anti-ADAR2 antibody (1.3.1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (M171-3; MBL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of LC3B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collected cell pellets were extracted in RIPA buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 5 mM NaF) and protein concentrations were determined with the BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany; #23227). The proteins were separated on 12% gels by electrophoresis and were transferred to PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA; ISEQ00010). The membranes were blocked in 0.5% BSA in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBS-T) and were probed with: anti-LC3B (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA; #3868) and anti-α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA; T5168), followed by secondary HRP-antibodies; anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; sc-2005), and anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; sc-2004). The blocking and probing were performed using SNAP i.d. 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Proteins were detected using Pierce ECL chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany; #32132). The bands were quantified by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblot Analysis of H9c2 Cardiomyocyte Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H9c2 cardiomyocyte extract (5 × 105 cells) was subjected to immunoblot analysis as previously described [46 (link),64 (link)], using an anti-Cd38 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) raised against a peptide fragment of mouse Cd38 (residues 279–301 in [46 (link)]), anti-Ryr2 polyclonal antibody (PeproTech, Canbury, NJ, USA) [67 (link)], anti-Fkbp12.6 monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) raised against the amino acids 38–108 of human/rat/mouse FKBP12.6, anti-Pten monoclonal antibody raised against the full-length human PTEN protein (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) raised against Ac-Asp-Asp-Asp-Ile-Ala-Ala-Leu-Val-Ile-Asp-Asn-Gly-Ser-Gly-Lys. A SNAP id® 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) was used for the analysis. The band intensities were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), as previously described [35 (link),46 (link),64 (link),82 (link),83 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying CCL3Gag Expression in Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze CCL3Gag expression, bacterial cells were harvested from 50 ml of cultures, resuspended in 1 ml PBS and added to FastPrep tubes containing glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell-free protein extracts were prepared by disruption in a FastPrep® FP120 Cell Disrupter by shaking at a speed of 6.5 m/s for 45 s. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000×g, 4 °C, for 2 min. Proteins were separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlot™ Dry Blotting System (Invitrogen). Proteins were detected using the SNAP i.d.® 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck kGaA Darmstadt, Germany) using a specific polyclonal goat anti-CCL3 antibody (R&D Systems, BAF450), 1:10,000 and, subsequently, a polyclonal rabbit anti-goat HRP-conjugated (Abcam) antibody, diluted 1:5000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins were extracted from different cells using T-PER Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Protein concentrations were quantified with Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). Denatured proteins (20 µg) were then analyzed using 10% e-PAGELs (ATTO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Merck Millipore). The membrane was blocked with 0.5% skim milk in phosphate buffered saline solution (pH 7.6) containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS/T), and then SNAP i.d. 2.0 Protein Detection system (Merck Millipore). The membrane was subsequently stripped and blotted with polyclonal rabbit anti-turboGFP antibody (Evrogen JSC, Moscow, Russia) (1:2,000 dilutions) and polyclonal rabbit anti-ACTIN (Sigma-Merck Millipore) (1:2,000 dilutions) to control for protein loading. HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling, Tokyo, Japan) were used at a dilution of 1:2,000 and developed using the ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Exposure for chemiluminescent samples or membrane analysis for the blots was performed by LAS4000 (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from different cells using T‐PER Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo). Protein concentrations were quantified by the Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio‐Rad). Denatured proteins (Mouse normal skins: 60 μg) were then analyzed using 15% e‐PAGELs (ATTO). After electrophoresis, these were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Merck Millipore). The membrane was blocked with 0.5% skimmed milk or 1% BSA in phosphate‐buffered saline solution (pH 7.6) containing 0.1% Tween‐20 (PBS/T) and then the SNAPi.d. 2.0 Protein Detection system (Merck Millipore). Primary antibodies were as follows: anti‐Cenp‐50/U (anti‐rabbit polyclonal),17 anti‐Actin (Sigma‐Merck Millipore). HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:2000 and developed using the ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Kit (GE Healthcare). Exposure for chemiluminescent samples or membrane analysis for the blots was performed with a LAS 4000 system (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoblot Analysis of CD38 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunoblot analysis was performed using an As4.1 cell extract (5 × 105 cells), as described in previous studies [10 (link),52 (link),60 (link)], using an anti-Cd38 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) raised against a peptide fragment of mouse Cd38 (residues 279–301 in [61 (link)]), an anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) raised against Ac-Asp-Asp-Asp-Ile-Ala-Ala-Leu-Val-Ile-Asp-Asn-Gly-Ser-Gly-Lys, and a SNAP id® 2.0 Protein Detection System (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The band intensities were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), as previously described [52 (link),62 (link),63 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!