The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

At2 scanner

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in France, United States, Germany

The Leica AT2 scanner is a compact and portable laser scanning device designed for indoor and outdoor applications. It features high-speed data capture capabilities and can precisely measure complex objects and surfaces with a range of up to 80 meters. The AT2 scanner provides reliable and accurate 3D data for a variety of applications, including construction, engineering, and heritage preservation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using at2 scanner

1

Quantitative Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostained slides were scanned by a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner (at ×400 magnification) and analyzed using a Leica Aperio ImageScope v12.3.0.5056. Before running the macros procedure, a classifier for identifying the areas of interest (tumor regions) was created by the algorithm of Genie to improve the accuracy of the results by excluding the stromal elements. The Cytoplasmic v2 algorithm was chosen for the automatic scoring of each antibody, which estimates the stains as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and strong (3+) according to the scoring criteria threshold. SMAD2, SMAD3, and β-catenin, due to the biologically activated forms, are translocated into the nuclei, and we include the estimated nuclear results for the subsequent analyses. For TGF-β1, the region of interest was the cytoplasm. Finally, the H-score of each slide was calculated by the formula: H-score = 1 × (percentage of weak staining) + 2 × (percentage of moderate staining) + 3 × (percentage of strong staining) (25 (link)–27 (link)). Based on the mean value of each biomarker’s H-score, patients were divided into two groups: 1) high expression, H-score ≥ mean value, and 2) low expression, H-score < mean value, separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cryostat-based Spinal Cord Injury Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Longitudinal Sects. (30 μm thickness) were obtained with a Leica cryostat and the extent of injury was assessed after cresyl violet staining as previously described11 (link). Slides were then scanned with an Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica, France) and a high-resolution picture of each slide was taken to evaluate the extent of the injury and reported on a stereotaxic transverse plane (C2). Each injury was then digitized and analyzed with Fiji v1.52p (NIH Image du National Institutes of Health, USA). The percentage of damaged tissue on the injured side was calculated by reference to a complete hemisection (which is 100% of the hemicord).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Spheroid Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At selected time points, 1–2 tumor spheroids were processed for histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to compare with corresponding OCT results. Each tumor spheroid was collected in a single 1.5 mL micro-centrifuge tube filled with 10% formaldehyde and fixed for 48 hours. Histology and immunohistochemistry processes of each tumor spheroid were performed by HistoWiz (New York, USA) using standard paraffin embedding techniques. Sections of tumor spheroids (5 µm in thickness) were stained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and TUNEL apoptosis detection (Promega), respectively. A counter staining of hematoxylin was applied to TUNEL. Images were obtained using a Leica AT2 scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPV RNA Detection in FFPE Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAscope stained FFPE cell sections were scanned using Leica AT2 scanner (Leica, US). Whole sections were examined at 40× magnification. RNAscope results of HPV were recorded based on signal location and positive cells. For probe-HPV-HR and probe-HPV-LR results, the signal locations of cells and the positive cell numbers in each sample, < 3, ≥3≤10 or > 10, were recorded. Besides the classic RNAscope dot signals detected in cytoplasm or nucleus, there were HPV RNA signals gathered as clusters, i.e. big amount of dot signals with high-density in limited area, above one or more cells which were recorded as well. For TERC results, RNA signals were only discovered in nucleus which were recorded.
Two gynecologists (Z. H. and H. Y.) evaluated the scanned sections independently. If a disagreement occurred during RNAscope assay result recording, they reviewed the case together and reached a final agreement. The interpretation was generally straightforward; therefore, no significant disagreements led to incompatibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Histological Assessment of Liver Engraftment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Livers and kidneys were fixed in 10% normal buffered formalin for 24 h, washed and stored in 70% ethanol until paraffin embedding and sectioning. Sections were stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Picrosirius Red, according to standard protocols (staining performed by Histoserv, Inc.). Engrafted hepatocytes were detected by IHC staining for FAH (ab151998) and human ASGR1 (ab254261), or RNAscope staining for human albumin (ACD, 457511). Liver zonation was observed by IHC for GS (ab125724), and viral transduction was monitored by GFP, by both IHC (ab183734) and RNAscope (EGFP probe, ACD 400281). All histology slides were scanned using a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner. FAH IHC staining was quantified using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

OSCC Tissue Microarray Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
175 OSCC FFPE OSCC tumour samples from surgical resections were retrieved from the Pathology Unit’s archive of the University of Naples “Federico II”. They were used to build 4 tissue microarrays (TMAs), and the most representative areas from each selected paraffin block were selected at least in duplicate. TMAs were built and stained as described in Martino et al.,20 (link) and 349 individual cores were obtained. H&E stained TMA slides were scanned using a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner with a 40× magnifier. After slide scanning, TMAs slide coverslips were removed by soaking the slides in xylene. The slides were then rehydrated in decreasing ethanol concentrations and then destained using a solution of HCl 0.3% for 4 min. After destaining, the slides were rinsed in tap water and immunostained with the antibody anti-Ki-67. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on a Ventana Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) using the rabbit monoclonal antibody anti-Ki-67 (clone 30-9, Ventana Medical Systems Inc.) following manufacturers’ recommendations. The new IHC-stained slides were then digitised.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Automated TUNEL Staining for Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor section processing and TUNEL staining were performed by HistoWiz (Brooklyn, NY). Briefly, all IHC staining is automated using BOND Rx. Slides were treated with Dewax, a solvent-based solution (Leica Biosystems). Tissue sections were fixed by adding 10% neutral buffered formalin for 15 minutes. Slides were treated with Proteinase K at 1:500 dilution. Tissue sections were re-fixed using 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissue sections were then treated with the equilibration buffer and incubated for 12 minutes at room temperature (RT). Subsequently the TdT reaction mix was added and incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C. The TUNEL reaction was stopped by adding 2X SSC. Tissue slides were treated with Peroxide Block (3-4% Hydrogen Peroxide) followed by wash buffer. Streptavidin HRP was added and incubated for 30 minutes at RT. DAB was added onto the slides and incubated for 10 minutes. Counter-staining was done by adding hematoxylin. Slides were covered using the Sakura Tissue Tek strainer and cover slips then scanned at 40x using the Leica AT2 scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Brain Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on an automated immunohistochemical staining system (BenchMark XT, USA. Stained tissue microarray slides were scanned with a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner at 400× magnification. Digital images were analyzed by Leica Aperio ImageScope software with the Nuclear v9 algorithm. The following biomarkers were recorded: 1) IDH1-R132H (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1), 2) 1p19q, 3) P53, 4) ATRX, and 5) Ki67. IDH1 and 1p19q codeletion and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) status were scored as positive or negative. P53 status was quantified as the percentage of stained nuclei: less than 10% of stained nuclei indicated an absence of immunoreactivity; 10–30% indicated a score of 1+; 30.1–50% indicated a score of 2+; and more than 50% indicated a score of 3+. Scores of − 1 or 1+ were regarded as P53 negative, and 2+ and 3+ were regarded as P53 positive. The Ki-67 index was also calculated according to the percentage of Ki-67 positive tumor cells present in the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Dopaminergic Neurons in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed as described previously24 (link). Mouse brains were cut into 35 µm sections on a horizontal sliding microtome. The free-floating sections were immune-blocked with 4% goat serum in 0.25% triton/PBS for 1 h. Dopaminergic neurons were stained with anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, 1:4,000, overnight at 4 °C). Sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody for 1 h followed by incubation with Vectastain ABC reagents (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) for 40 min and then color was developed with 3,3-diaminobenzidine. To monitor DA neuro degeneration, two individuals blind to the treatment counted the number of TH-immunoreactive (TH-IR) neurons in the SN pars compacta (SNpc) of six evenly spaced brain sections from a series of 24 sections that covered the entire SN26 (link). Stereological counts of THir SNpc neurons were estimated using an optical fractionator method on an Olympus BX50 stereological microscope within user-defined boundaries24 (link). All immunohistochemistry images were captured by a Leica Aperio AT2 Scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two 2.0-mm diameter samples were removed then transferred to a recipient paraffin block to construct TMAs using a Tissue Array MiniCore 3 (ALPHELYS, Plaisir, France). Samples (4-µm thick) were obtained from each TMA with Leica Rotary Microtome RM2135 (Wetzlar, Germany). Immunohistochemical staining was performed on Leica BOND III automated system. All samples were pretreated in a 65 °C oven for 1.5 h. Staining was performed with dewaxing and epitope retrieval. Samples were blocked with peroxide solution for 7 min. Selected antibodies (shown in Additional file 1: Table S1) were used to incubate samples, followed by post-primary for 8 min, polymer for 8 min, diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 5 min, and hematoxylin counterstain for 2 min. Finally, the samples were dehydrated, cleared, then fixed with neutral resins. Stained samples were scanned with Leica Aperio AT2 scanner (400× magnification) and analysed by two different pathologists. Samples were scored as negative (0+), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and strong (3+) signal. The percentage of positivity was also calculated by two pathologists. The histological scores (H-Score) was calculated using following formula: H-Score = 0 × (percentage of negative) + 1 × (percentage of weak) + 2 × (percentage of moderate) + 3 × (percentage of strong). Thus, the H-Score ranges from 0 to 300 [5 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!