The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanodrop photospectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The NanoDrop photospectrometer is a laboratory instrument designed for the measurement and analysis of DNA, RNA, and protein samples. It utilizes a unique sample retention system that requires only 1-2 microliters of sample to perform precise spectrophotometric measurements. The NanoDrop provides accurate and reproducible results for a wide range of sample types and concentrations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using nanodrop photospectrometer

1

Quantifying Gene Expression in dgf Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Siblings were separated from dgf mutants at 7 dpf by using Alizarin live-staining. RNA was isolated by using the Qiagen RNeasy Kit, and a DNaseI (Promega) digest was performed on the column. RNA quality was checked on an agarose gel and measured with a Nanodrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Random hexamers were used for reverse transcription (M-MLV reverse transcriptase, Promega). The Primer 3 program was used for primer design. The primers spanned at least one intron to avoid amplification from genomic DNA. Melting temperatures and PCR efficiency were tested, and qPCR was performed using the Bio-Rad MyIQ single-color real-time PCR detection system and software. Reactions contained 12.5 μl Sybr Green (Bio-Rad), 3 μl primer mix (at 1.5 μM), 5 μl cDNA at 10 ng/μl, and 4.5 μl Millipore water. qPCR program: 3 minutes at 95°C, 10 seconds at 95°C followed by 45 seconds at the optimal primer temperature (40 cycles); 1 minute at 95°C and 1 minute at 65°C. cDNA was analyzed from three pooled clutches of embryos for the siblings and mutants. ef1a was used as an internal control. Groups were compared by Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Expression and Purification of GAP Domains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression vector for MgcRacGAP GAP domain was constructed by ligating the cDNA corresponding to codons for residues 345-618 of human MgcRacGAP (NCBI accession no. NM_013277) between the EcoR I and Xho I restriction sites of pGEX-4T-1 (GE Healthcare). Expression vectors for BCR GAP domain (residues 1010-1271 of human BCR (NP_004318)), p50RhoGAP GAP domain (residues 205-439 of mouse p50RhoGAP (NP_001139374)), PAK1 PBD domain (residues 72-132 of human PAK1 (AAC50590) and Rac1 Q61L (NP_008839) were analogous to constructs that have been described previously [34 (link), 35 (link)]. The F28L variant of human Rac1 was produced by PCR-based Phusion Site-Directed Mutagenesis (Thermo Scientific) and subcloned into the bacterial expression vector pGEX-4T-1 [35 (link)]. All DNA constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
E. coli DH5α were transformed with the pGEX constructs, and recombinant proteins were purified as described by García-Mata et al. [36 (link)]. Protein concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific) and Bradford protein assay, while protein purities were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DNA Immobilization on Paramagnetic Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polystyrene microspheres coated with Streptavidin (mean diameter 4.95 μm) were purchased from Bangs Laboratories (US). Washes and incubations were preferably performed in low-binding tubes (Eppendorf, Germany). Beads were washed and centrifuged three times for 3 min at 21,000 g in 100 μl of binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.0005% TritonX-100). Beads were then resuspended in 10–50 μl of binding buffer containing 5 to 300 pmol of template DNA. Reactions were incubated at room temperature for 3 h or overnight under continuous mixing using a MonoShake Microplate Mixer (Variomag) at maximum speed (2000 rpm). Following binding, beads were centrifuged for 3 min at 21,000 g and the supernatant with the unbound DNA was removed. The amount of DNA bound on the beads was estimated by measuring the DNA concentration in the supernatant using a Nanodrop photospectrometer (ThermoFisher, US). Beads were repeatedly washed with binding buffer and nuclease-free water until the DNA concentration in the supernatant was close to zero. DNA-immobilization on magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280, mean diameter 2.8 μm, Thermofisher, US) was performed following the same protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Quantification of RNA from Colon Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA isolation, colon pieces were frozen in liquid N2 and homogenized with mortar and pestle prior to resuspension in 1 mL of Trizol (Sigma-Aldrich: Cat #: 93289). RNA from cells was isolated by direct addition of Trizol reagent to the pelleted cells. Further, RNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction. Shortly, 200 µL of chloroform was added, samples were shaken thoroughly and centrifuged (13000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C) and subsequently RNA from the upper aqueous phase was precipitated with 700 µL isopropanol and 200 µg of glycogen to enhance precipitation. After pelleting, RNA was washed with 75 % ethanol and air-dried at 56 °C in a thermoshaker. Depending on the size, the pellet was reconstituted in 10-50 µL of DEPC-treated water (Life Technologies) and dissolved at 56 °C for 10 min. RNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling Circular RNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent and RNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA (1000 ng) from each sample was added into the reverse transcription system to synthesize cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Beijing, China). Specific primers spanning the back-splice junction site of circRNAs were designed and then synthesized (Table S1). The qRT-PCR analyses were performed using a LightCycler® 480 System (Roche, Rotkreuz, CH) with TB GREEN Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa). Relative RNA expression level was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method with GAPDH serving as internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Skin Biopsy RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skin biopsies were collected from 25 SSc patients after informed consent study number: NL57997.091.16. RNA was extracted using RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Next, RNA concentration was measured using a Nanodrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and subsequently, 1 μg of RNA was converted into cDNA in a single step reverse transcriptase PCR using oligo dT primer and M-MLV Reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). In this cDNA, FAP gene expression was measured using 0.2 µM of validated cDNA-specific primers (see Table 1) (Biolegio, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) in a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Relative gene expression (−ΔCt) was calculated using four reference genes: GAPDH, HPRT, TBP, and RPS27A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Snake Venom Characterization by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Venom samples were redissolved in LCMS water and diluted to a concentration of 0.18 mg/mL. We determined venom protein concentration by the A280 reading from a NanoDrop Photospectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). We then loaded 15 μg of venom protein onto a Prominence HPLC apparatus (Shimadzu Corp., Columbia, MD, USA). Samples were run through a Phenomenex Aeris widepore column (3.6 micron, C18, part # 00G-4482-AN) maintained at 25 °C. Samples were eluted with solution A as 0.1 mM TFA in water and solution B as 0.06 mM TFA in acetonitrile, and absorbance at 220 nm was measured over 150 min with the following run parameters: 5 min at 10% B, 110 min increasing from 10 to 55% B, 5 min increasing from 55 to 75% B, 5 min at 75% B, 5 min decreasing from 75–10% B, and 5 min at 10% B. Venom peak areas were quantified using Shimadzu Lab Solution v2 software, combining default peak calls by the iPeakFinder algorithm with manual curation of the peak baseline and filtering of peaks making up less than 0.1% total area as noise. Peaks were called uniquely per individual snake, by aligning the serial HPLC profiles from all samples from a single individual and calling peaks that were present. The relative abundance of HPLC peaks in each sample will be henceforth referred to as venom composition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription, and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Tri-reagent (SigmaeAldrich) following manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop photospectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Thereafter, a maximum of 1 mg RNA was dissolved in ultrapure water and treated with 1 ml of DNAse (Life Technologies) for 15 min at room temperature to remove possible genomic DNA, followed by incubation at 65 C with 1 ml EDTA (Life Technologies). Samples were reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using 1.9 ml ultrapure water, 2.4 ml 10Â DNAse buffer, 2.0 ml 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 0.8 ml 25 mM dNTPs, 0.4 mg oligo dT primer, 1 ml 200 U/ml MMLv-reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) and 0.5 ml 40 U/ml RNAsin (Promega) and incubated for 5 min at 25 C, 60 min at 39 C, and 5 min at 95 C using a thermo-cycler. Gene expression was measured using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 0.25 mM primers (see Table 1) (Biolegio) with a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The amplification protocol was 10 min at 95 C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 C and 1 min at 60 C. Melting curves were analyzed to confirm product specificity. To calculate the relative gene expression, the average of the reference genes GAPDH and ribosomal protein S27A (RPS27A) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!