The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Diva retrieval

Manufactured by Biocare Medical
Sourced in United States

Diva Retrieval is a laboratory instrument designed for the automated separation and enrichment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from whole blood samples. The device utilizes a microfluidic-based technology to capture and isolate CTCs based on their unique physical and biological properties.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using diva retrieval

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of STING Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124 °C, 3 min, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 min, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 min, the primary antibody for STING (ab92605) (33) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. STING staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. H-score of STING expression was calculated [25 (link)]. STING protein was expressed as an H score, defined as STING intensity multiplied by the percentage of STING positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of PD-L1 and pJAK2 in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The University of Pittsburgh IRB #99-069 approved the use of clinical samples and written informed consent was obtained. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124°C, 3 minutes, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 minutes, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 minutes, the primary antibody for PD-L1 (clone 405.9A11) (33 (link)) and the pJAK2 (Y1007-1008) (clone E132) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 minutes and counterstained with hematoxylin. PD-L1 and pJAK2 staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. Scoring was determined by %tumor stained for PD-L1 or pJAK2, respectively. Tumors with <5% tumor cells positive staining were considered negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of STING Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124 °C, 3 min, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 min, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 min, the primary antibody for STING (ab92605) (33) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. STING staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. H-score of STING expression was calculated [25 (link)]. STING protein was expressed as an H score, defined as STING intensity multiplied by the percentage of STING positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The University of Pittsburgh IRB #99–069 approved the use of clinical samples, and written informed consent was obtained. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical) and a decloaking chamber at 124°C, 3 minutes, and cooled for 10 minutes. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using 3% H2O2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 minutes, CAS Block (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes, and the primary antibody for PD-L1 (6.2 μg/mL final concentration, clone 405.9A11, kindly provided by Gordon J. Freeman) was used as previously reported (32 (link)). The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 minutes, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 minutes. The substrate used was 3,3,-diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 minutes and counterstained with hematoxylin. PD-L1 staining was quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. Scoring was determined by the percentage of tumor stained for PD-L1. Tumors with <5% tumor cell-positive staining were considered negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive H&E Staining and IHC Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For H&E staining, 5‐micron‐thick FFPE slides 5‐micron were washed twice for 5 min each in xylene, 100% ethanol, and 95% ethanol, followed by a brief rinse in water and a 15‐min incubation in hematoxylin. After a brief water rinse post‐incubation, slides were dipped in 0.25% hydrochloric acid‐ethanol, followed by brief dip in 1% lithium carbonate, a water rinse, and a 5‐min incubation in eosin Y. Slides were then briefly rinsed twice each with 95% ethanol, 100% ethanol, and xylene and were cover‐slipped.
IHC for CD3 and CD20 was performed on 5‐micron‐thick formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded whole tissue sections using the following antibodies (clone, catalog number, dilution, vendor): CD3 (polyclonal, A0452, 1:400, Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA) and CD20 (monoclonal/L26, M0755, 1:140, Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA), each using DIVA retrieval in the decloaker (Biocare Medical; Pacheco, California, USA) and a polymer detection system (Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA), with counterstains using dab and hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!