The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using sc7640 sputter coater

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Hydrogel Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ultrastructure of 3, 6, and 8 mg/mL EndoECM, 8 mg/mL MyoECM, and 8 mg/mL No-DC Endo hydrogels was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Sample processing was performed in the proteomics facility of SCSIE University of Valencia. This proteomics laboratory is a member of Proteored, PRB3 and is supported by grant PT17/0019, of the PE I + D + i 2013–2016, funded by ISCIII and ERDF. Hydrogels were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS (Sigma Aldrich, grade II, 25%) for 24 h, washed in PBS, and kept in PBS at 4°C. Then, hydrogels were treated with 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h and dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol (30, 50, 70, 90, 100% ethanol) for 30 min per wash and kept in 100% ethanol overnight at 4°C. Hydrogels were washed 3 additional times in 100% ethanol for 30 min and critical point dried using a Autosamdri® 814 Critical Point Dryer (Tousimis) with carbon dioxide (CO2) at high pressure (1200 pound-force per square inch, psi) as the transitional medium and a maximum heating temperature of 40°C. Dried samples were coated with gold-palladium for 2 min using a SC7640 Sputter Coater (Quorum technologies) and imaged with a SEM FEG Hitachi S-4800 (SCSIE University of Valencia, Spain). To analyze fiber diameter, four measurements per three 30.0 k fields per sample were measured using ImageJ software (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Biomolecular Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytochrome c (12.4 kDa)
from equine heart, myoglobin (17.6 kDa) from equine heart, pepsin
(35 kDa) from porcine gastric mucosa, bovine serum albumin (BSA, 66.4
kDa), conalbumin (77 kDa) from chicken egg white, concanavalin A (102
kDa) from Canavalia ensiformis, immunoglobulin
G (IgG, ∼150 kDa) from human serum, beta amylase (β-amylase,
223.8 kDa) from sweet potato, chaperonin 60 (GroEL, ∼800 kDa)
from Escherichia coli, ammonium acetate,
tris-acetate, potassium chloride, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA), adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP), magnesium chloride,
ammonium hydroxide, and acetic acid were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). Methanol, acetone, and LC-MS grade
water were purchased from Biosolve (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands).
Nanospray needles were homemade from preheated borosilicate glass
capillaries (Science Products GmbH, Hofheim, Germany) on a DMZ universal
electrode puller (Zeitz-Instruments Vertriebs GmbH, Munich, Germany)
followed by gold coating with a SC7640 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies,
Kent, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gemmae Imaging and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each experiment at least 15 gemmae were observed for each line. Plants were imaged using a Leica DFC310 FX camera connected to a Leica M165 FC stereomicroscope. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was carried out with the Zeiss LSM510 Meta microscope using the Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 25x/0.8 water immersion lens with Argon/2 laser excitation at 488 nm in order to observe fluorescence emitted by YFP and chlorophyll at 505–550 nm and 645–710 nm, respectively. Fluorescence images were constructed by making maximum intensity projections from a Z-stack containing the epidermal cell layer of gemmae. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) gemmae collected from gemma cups were immediately fixed in dry methanol, critical point dried using a Tousimis Autosamdri-815, mounted on aluminium stubs and coated with a gold/palladium mixture using a Quorum technologies SC7640 sputter coater. The samples were then imaged with a JEOL JSM-5510 SEM. All processing of confocal microscopy images was carried out using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). Other images were adjusted using Adobe Photoshop CS4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Imaging Plant Structures with Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were obtained using a Leica M165FC stereomicroscope, Leica M series Plan APO 1.0× objective and Leica DFC310 FX camera. For confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM), plants were stained with 15 µM propidium iodide for 15 min, then submerged in water. Images were acquired with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope using a Leica HCX APO 40×/0.80 W U-V-I dipping lens with sequential scans. YFP fluorescence was detected using excitation at 514 nm with an argon laser and emission was measured between 524 and 568 nm using an Acousto-Optic Tunable Filter. PI was excited at 543 nm using a helium-neon laser and emission measured between 568 and 659 nm. Images were processed using FIJI to create brightest-point 3d projections (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)).
For scanning electron microscopy, samples were fixed in dry methanol, critical point dried using a Tousimis Autosamdri-815, mounted on aluminium stubs and coated with a gold/palladium mixture using a Quorum Technologies SC7640 sputter coater. Samples were imaged immediately with a JEOL JSM-5510 SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Examination of Leaf Micromorphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy measurements were carried out on three leaf pieces per scion/rootstock combination and fertigation level (typically 1 cm2) (n = 3) cut with a razor blade from mid-laminar areas at between 10:00 and 11:00 am. Leaves were then immediately fixed in cold (4 °C) 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2, rinsed in a 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100%) and dried under CO2 in an Emitech K850 critical point dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ashford, U.K.)29 (link). Specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs with carbon double-sided adhesive disks, coated with gold/palladium in a SC7640 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Newhaven, U.K.) and examined under a S-3400N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy Characterization of Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A SC7640 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Kent, United Kingdom) was used to coat the crosslinked and non-crosslinked samples with gold prior to their visualization with a field emission scanning electron microscope Zeiss Supra 40 (FE-SEM, Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom). The intensity used for coating the samples was 20 mA, the voltage 0.8 kV and the duration of the coating was 120 s, which provides a coating thickness of 32.6 nm, following equipment specifications. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken at approx. 6 mm working distance, 3 kV and with ×50,000 magnifications. Fiber diameter (Ø fiber) and inter-fiber separation (Int.sep.) were determined with AxioVision SE64 Rel. 4.9.1 (Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom) by measuring 40 fibers per sample. The inter-fiber separation was defined as the maximum horizontal distance between two fibers that belong to the same pore. A pore was defined as the void space constituted by fibers (normally four fibers) that intersect one with each other and are located on the same layer of fibers. Fiber diameter and inter-fiber separations were measure in the same way in dry conditions and during the degradation assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gold-Coated Glass for Spin-Coated Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Firstly, the glass slip was cleaned by using acetone or water to remove any fingerprint marks or dirt on the surface of the glass. Before the composite solution was coated onto the glass slip, the glass slip was first deposited with gold layer. The glass cover slip was deposited with a gold layer by using an SC7640 Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, West Sussex, UK) with the duration of 67 s for the sputtering process to obtain a 50 nm thick gold layer, which is the optimum thickness for an SPR sensor [93 (link)].
PAR–chitosan–GO and CdS QD–chitosan–GO active layers were produced by spin coating method using a P-6708D spin Coater (Inc. Medical Devices, Indianapolis, USA). Approximately 0.55 mL of the composite solution were placed on the gold layered glass film, which was spun at 6000 rpm for 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microstructural Characterization of Teeth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were sputter-coated with a 6-nm layer of platinum (SC7640 sputter coater; Quorum Technologies, Guelph, ON, Canada). A SUPRA 40 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe the microstructure of the teeth. This field-effect gun microscope operates at 0.5–30 kV. Observations of sectioned samples were made by using an Everhart-Thornley Secondary Electron (SE) detector at 20 keV and with a backscattered electrons (BSE) detector at 20 keV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morphological Analysis via Scanning Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological examination was performed with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Samples were mounted on aluminum specimen stubs and gold-sputtered to 5 nm thick films to prevent beam charging effects (SC7640 Sputter coater, Quorum Technologies, Kent, UK). High resolution scanning electron microscopic analysis was performed at 20 kV (magnification range of 30,000-120,000×) using a FEI Quanta 200 (FEI, Oregon, USA) microscope and images were processed using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Leaf Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy measurements were carried out on three leaf pieces per scion/rootstock combination and fertigation level (typically 1 cm²) (n = 3) cut with a razor blade from mid-laminar areas at between 10:00 and 11:00 am. As described in Oustric et al. 20 , leaves were then immediately xed in cold (4 °C) 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2, rinsed in a 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100%) and dried under CO 2 in an Emitech K850 critical point dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ashford, U.K.).
Specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs with carbon double-sided adhesive disks, coated with gold/palladium in a SC7640 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Newhaven, U.K.) and examined under a S-3400N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!