The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using anti cd9

1

Exosome Immunoprofiling by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunoprecipitation of exosomes and their subsequent analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), 4 μm-diameter aldehyde/sulphate latex beads (Interfacial Dynamics) were incubated with purified anti-CD9 or anti-CD24 (BD Biosciences) or anti-ADAM-10 (Abcam, UK) antibodies at 22°C overnight at gentle agitation, as previously described. For FACS analysis, 30 μg of exosomes were incubated with 3 × 105 anti-CD9, anti-CD24 or anti-ADAM-10 beads in 150 μl of PBS at 4°C overnight at gentle agitation. The reaction was stopped by incubation of exosome-bead complexes in 0.2 M glycine for 30 min. The exosome-bead complexes were washed twice with FACS buffer (3% exosome depleted FBS in PBS). The beads-bound exosomes were then incubated with human IgG (BD Biosciences) at 4°C for 30 min with subsequent washing with FACS buffer and incubation with fluorescein-conjugated anti-CD9, anti-CD24, anti-CD63, anti-CD81 or isotype antibodies (all from BD Biosciences) for 40 min at room temperature at gentle agitation. The complexes were washed twice, suspended in 300 μl of FACS buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry using FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and FACS Diva 6.1 Software. The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the stained exosomes was analyzed as compared to isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were lysed in LIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) for western blot analysis to confirm the characteristic EV biomarkers (CD9, CD63, and CD81). The blots were probed with flowing primary antibodies: anti-CD9 (1:500 dilution, BD Biosciences, 312102), anti-CD63 (1:500 dilution, Ancell, 215-820), and anti-CD81 (1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology,sc-166029). Chemiluminescence was detected using an Azure 280 imaging system (Azure Biosystems). The concentrations and sizes of EVs were determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis using Nanosight NS300 and were found to be 1.22 × 1011 particles/mL (CaOV3), 2.7 × 1011 particles/mL (OV90), 3.0 × 1011 particles/mL (ES2), and 3.8 × 1011 particles/mL (TiOSE4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Porcine cATMSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porcine cATMSC-EV were identified by bead-based flow cytometry, screening for EV and MSC markers. EV were covalently coupled to 4-μm aldehyde/sulphate-latex beads (Invitrogen-ThermoFisher Scientific) with a 15 min incubation, and then blocked for 2 h with BCB buffer (PBS, 0.1% BSA, and 0.01% sodium azide (NaN3); Sigma Aldrich). EV-coupled beads were centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min and re-suspended in BCB buffer. Next, beads were incubated for 30 min at RT with the fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies anti-CD73-PE and anti-CD90-PE-Cy7 (1:50; both from BD); or the primary Ab anti-CD9 (Clone VJ1/20; 1:10), anti-CD63 (Clone TEA3/18; 1:10), anti-CD81 (Clone 5A6; 1:10), anti-CD29 (1:10; BD), anti-CD44 (1:10; AbD Serotec) or IgG isotype control (1:10; Abcam) followed by incubation with the FITC-goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgG (1:10; Bionova) or A488-rabbit anti-rat IgG (1:100; AbD Serotec). EV-coupled beads were washed with BCB buffer and spun down at 2000×g for 10 min after each step. Data was acquired in a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD), and analysed with FlowJo® v10 (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Exosome Markers by DELFIA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosome markers were detected with DELFIA.34 Specifically, ExoDiff or ExoPr0 dilutions or their diluent, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), were loaded in duplicates on high‐binding 96‐well plates (R&D Systems, DY990) and incubated at 4°C. Next day, the plates were washed three times with DELFIA washing buffer before any reagent was added to wells (PerkinElmer, 1244‐114). First, plates were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Then, plates were incubated with anti‐CD9 (1:500), CD63 (1:200) or CD81 (1:500; BD Biosciences, 555 370, 556 019, 555 675). After 2 h, plates were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:2,000; Abcam, ab98691, ab97073) for 1 h. Afterwards, streptavidin‐europium conjugate in assay buffer (1:1,000) was added to wells for 1 h (PerkinElmer, 1244‐106 and 1244‐30). Finally, plates were washed six times and incubated with enhancement solution, while being shaken at 300rpm for 10 min (PerkinElmer, 1244‐104). The samples were analysed with a PHERAstar plate reader with the following settings: 337 nm excitation, 620 nm detection, 200 μs integration time and 60 μs lag time (BMG Labtech). Fluorescence value of each control, that is PBS incubated with both primary and secondary antibodies was subtracted from sample fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Profiling Ovarian Cancer-Derived EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs derived from ovarian cancer lines were lysed in LIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) containing protease inhibitor (Roche). Western blot analysis was performed as described previously.[60] The nitrocellulose membrane blots were probed with anti‐CD9 (1:500 dilution, BD Biosciences), anti‐CD63 (1:500 dilution, Ancell), and anti‐CD81 (1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The chemiluminescence signal was detected with an Azure 280 imaging system (Azure Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated EVs were re-suspended in Laemmli buffer and boiled for 5 minutes at 95 °C. Specifically, 20 µg of EVs were prepared in non-reducing conditions for tetraspanins detection, while 35 µg were used for soluble protein detection. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Nonspecific sites were saturated with 5% (w/v) skimmed milk in Tris-buffered saline: 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.4, and 0.5% Tween 20 (T-TBS). Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-CD9 (1:1000, BD Pharmingen, #555370, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-CD63 (1:2000; BD Pharmingen, #556019, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-Alix (1:500, Santa Cruz, #sc-271975, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-TSG101 (1:500, Novus Bio, #NB200–112, Littleton, CO, USA), anti-DCXR (1:1000, Abcam, #ab110283, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK), anti-Calnexin (1:1000, Sigma, #C7617, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and anti-β-tubulin (1:5000, Santa Cruz, #sc-9104, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After washing with T-TBS, membranes were incubated with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted 1:2000 for 45 min. Immunoreactive bands were revealed by the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ImmobilonHRP substrate, #WBKLS0500, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles by Western Blot and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Western blot analysis (WB), MSC proteins and exosomes were added to 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF membranes, Millipore), followed by blocking in 5% skim milk for 2 h at RT. Next, the membrane was incubated with diluted primary antibodies (anti-CD9 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD63 (BD Biosciences), anti-TSG101 (BD Biosciences), and anti-calnexin (BD Biosciences)) at 4°C on a shaker overnight. After three washes with Tris-buffered saline/Tween (TBST), the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Proteintech) at RT on a shaker for 2 h. Finally, the membranes were analyzed via the ChemiDoc™ XRS system (Bio-Rad).27 (link)Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi, Japan) was used to observe the morphology of the exosomes and take images. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was performed by electrophoresis and Brownian motion video analysis laser scattering microscopy (Particlemetrix) to analyze the particle size, concentration and distribution, and the results were analyzed with ZetaView (ZetaView 8.04.02 software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

EV Characterization and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were lysed in LIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) for western blot analysis to confirm the characteristic EV biomarkers (CD9, CD63, and CD81). The blots were probed with flowing primary antibodies: anti-CD9 (1:500 dilution, BD Biosciences), anti-CD63 (1:500 dilution, Ancell), and anti-CD81 (1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Chemiluminescence was detected using an Azure 280 imaging system (Azure Biosystems). The concentrations and sizes of EVs were determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis using Nanosight NS300 and were found to be 1.22 × 1011 particles/mL (CaOV3), 2.7 ×1011 particles/mL (OV90), 3.0 × 1011 particles/mL (ES2), and 3.8 × 1011 particles/mL (TiOSE4)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of hMSCs and Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The StemPro Differentiation Kit (Life Technologies) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations to determine the capacity of hMSCs to undergo adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Characterization of hMSCs and hMSC-microvesicles was performed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) utilizing a FACSCalibur™ sorter (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). FITC-conjugated antibodies (anti-CD73, anti-CD90, anti-CD105, anti-CD146, anti-CD14, anti-CD34, anti-CD45, and anti-HLA-DR; BD Biosciences) were incubated with samples for 30 min in PBS containing 0.5% BSA at 4 °C. Mouse isotypic IgG was used as a control.
FACS analysis of hMSC-exosomes was performed using exosome capture beads based on anti-CD63 coupled antibody (Invitrogen Dynabeads Exosome Human CD63 Isolation/Detection Reagent) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Specific FITC-conjugated exosomal markers (anti-CD9 and anti-CD81; BD Biosciences) were used as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoblotting of Embryo-Derived EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
D3-EVs and D5-EVs were isolated from a pool of spent media from 50 embryos at different developmental stage and from an equal volume of 10% SSS- or 5% HSA- supplemented fresh media as negative controls and were used for immunoblotting analysis. Ten µg of isolated EVs (by Bradford assay and by NanoDrop8000 measurement) were lysed in reducing sample buffer [0.25 M Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol and 0.04% bromophenol blue] and boiled for 5 minutes at 95 °C. For tetraspanins detection, non-reducing sample buffer (without 2-mercaptoethanol) was used. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, blocked in 5% non-fat powdered milk in TBS-T (0.5% Tween-20) and the membranes were incubated with the following antibodies: anti-ALIX (1:500, Santa Cruz, #sc-271975, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-CD9 (1:1000, BD Pharmingen, #555370, San Jose, CA, USA), and anti-CD63 (1:1000; BD Pharmingen, #556019, San Jose, CA, USA). Protein bands were detected using X-ray film and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!