The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using mouse gene 2.0 st genechip

1

Transcriptome Analysis of BMDM Response to Influenza Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcript profiling was performed using two biological replicate samples of unprimed BMDMs infected with PR8 virus. Total RNA (100 ng) was converted to biotin-labeled cRNA using the Ambion WT expression kit (Life Technologies) and hybridized to a Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip (Affymetrix, Inc). After staining and washing, array signals were normalized and transformed into log2 transcript expression values using the Robust Multi-array Average algorithm (Partek Genomics Suite v6.6). Differential expression was defined by applying a 0.5 log2 (signal) difference between conditions. Lists of differentially expressed transcripts were analyzed for functional enrichment using the DAVID bioinformatics databases (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software (www.qiagen.com/ingenuity). The microarray data is deposited under GEO accession ID GSE103059 and is available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE103059.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic Analysis of Knockout Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcript profiling was performed using two biological replicate samples of unprimed BMDMs obtained from WT and knockout mice. Total RNA (100 ng) was converted to biotin-labeled cRNA using the Ambion WT expression kit (Life Technologies) and hybridized to a Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip (Affymetrix, Inc). After staining and washing, array signals were normalized and transformed into log2 transcript expression values using the Robust Multi-array Average algorithm (Partek Genomics Suite v6.6) 49 (link). Differential expression was defined by applying a 0.5 log2(signal) difference between conditions. Lists of differentially expressed transcripts were analyzed for functional enrichment using the DAVID bioinformatics databases (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/)50 (link) and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software (www.qiagen.com/ingenuity).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptomic Analysis of Clostridium difficile Toxin in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were infected with R20291 (CDT+) or R20291_cdtb (CDT−) and whole-cecal tissue transcriptomic analysis was performed on day 3 post infection. R20291 and R20291_Cdtb RNA samples were processed by the Affymetrix Gene Chip® WT PLUS Reagent Kit and hybridized to the Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip®. The Affymetrix Mouse Transcriptome.CEL files were analyzed by the UVA Bioinformatics core. All preprocessing and analysis was done using R. Expression intensities were summarized, normalized, and transformed using Robust Multiarray Average algorithm68 (link). Probesets not mapping to an Entrez gene were excluded. For examining differential gene expression, a linear model was fit with empirical-Bayes moderated standard errors using the limma package in R. The microarray analysis datasets are included in Table S1 comparing R20291 vs. R20291_Cdtb. Enriched pathways of the top upregulated transcripts (log FC > 0.5; p < 0.05) were created using the ConsensusPathDP database21 (link). Enriched pathways of the top upregulated transcripts (log FC > 0.5) were also created using the Ingenuity Database20 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from WT and Ctsb−/− BMDMs, reverse transcribed into biotin-labeled cRNA with an Ambion WT Expression kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and hybridized to a Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip (Affymetrix). Gene expression data were normalized and transformed into log2 transcript expression values with the robust multiarray average algorithm (version 6.6; Partek Genomics Suite; Irizarry et al., 2003 (link)). Differential expression was defined by application of a difference in expression of 0.5-fold (log2 signal) between conditions. The dataset has been deposited in the GEO database under accession no. GSE79508.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Analysis of Knockout Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcript profiling was performed using two biological replicate samples of unprimed BMDMs obtained from WT and knockout mice. Total RNA (100 ng) was converted to biotin-labeled cRNA using the Ambion WT expression kit (Life Technologies) and hybridized to a Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip (Affymetrix, Inc). After staining and washing, array signals were normalized and transformed into log2 transcript expression values using the Robust Multi-array Average algorithm (Partek Genomics Suite v6.6) 49 (link). Differential expression was defined by applying a 0.5 log2(signal) difference between conditions. Lists of differentially expressed transcripts were analyzed for functional enrichment using the DAVID bioinformatics databases (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/)50 (link) and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software (www.qiagen.com/ingenuity).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dicer1 cKO Transcriptome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA samples from the corpus and the cauda epididymal regions of three controls and three Dicer1 cKO mice were used to determine the transcript signature found in these regions. Microarray analyses were performed by the CHUQ Gene Expression Platform (Quebec, Canada). Samples were hybridized to the GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST (Affymetrix). This array encompasses 35,240 transcript probe-sets, from three transcript data sources (i.e. RefSeq, Ensembl and lncRNA db). As described above, microarrays were scanned using the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G and Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console software (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), to produce the intensity files. The image data were analyzed with Expression Console Software for quality control (Affymetrix) (S2 Fig) and extracted with the GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS v 1.4; Affymetrix). CEL files were imported and analyzed with Partek Genomics Suite 6.5 software (Partek Incorporated). All gene expression microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository database for public access (#GSE77139).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microarray Analysis of Mouse Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA isolation and quality controls were performed as described in References [31 (link),32 (link)]. The mRNA samples isolated from the three independent cell culture replicates were mixed in equal mRNA quantities. The procedures for cDNA synthesis and labelling were carried out according to the Ambion WT Expression Kit (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) using 500 ng of total RNA as a starting material, as described in Reference [33 (link)]. Target DNA fragmentation, hybridization on Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST microarrays, array washing, staining, and scanning were performed as described in Reference [34 (link)]. Scans of the microarrays were converted into CEL files using the scanner software, and were then processed in Affymetrix Expression Console (build 1.4.1.46) using the RMA method. Fold change threshold was set to 1.5×. Probesets with no associated Gene Symbol were excluded from the analyses. The raw data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus [35 (link)] under accession code GSE96899.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptome Analysis of RNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy spin column kit (Qiagen) and quantified using a BioSpectrometer (Eppendorf). One hundred nanograms of RNA was used as input for the GeneChip® PrimeView™ (3′ IVT human array) and GeneChip™ Mouse Gene 2.0 ST (mouse exon array) microarrays (Affymetrix). Synthesis, labeling, and purification of biotinylated complementary RNA and sense-stranded DNA targets were carried out according to manufacturers’ instructions using the GeneChip™ 3′ IVT PLUS Reagent Kit and GeneChip™ WT PLUS Reagent Kit, respectively. Hybridization was performed using a GeneChip Hybridization Oven 640 overnight at 45 °C. Microarray washing and staining was performed on a GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 and scanning on a GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G, commanded by the Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console software. Probe-level analysis including background subtraction and quantile normalization took place with the Robust Multi Array Average Algorithm using the Affymetrix Expression Console Software 1.3. DEGs (p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5 for the GeneChip™ Mouse Gene 2.0 ST exon array and p < 0.01 and fold change > 1.5 for the GeneChip® PrimeView™) were determined using the Transcriptome Analysis Console v3.0. Raw and processed Affymetrix data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository under accession number GSE120127.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After FACS, cells were counted and resuspended in TRIzol lysis reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. RNA extraction was performed using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen). Quality and quantity of RNA extraction were performed using the Bioanalyzer 2100 RNA 6000 Pico chip assay (Agilent Technologies). Total RNA (2.5 ng) was reverse-transcribed following the Ovation Pico WTA System V2 (NuGEN). cDNA hybridization was performed using the GeneChip Mouse Gene 2.0 ST (Affymetrix). See Supplementary Material for further details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!