The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kasp chemistry

Manufactured by LGC
Sourced in United Kingdom

KASP chemistry is a flexible, reliable, and cost-effective PCR-based genotyping solution. It utilizes a mix of fluorescently labeled, allele-specific oligonucleotides and a common reverse primer to deliver accurate and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using kasp chemistry

1

Genotyping and Replication of Genetic Associations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the SSI replication cohort, genotyping of the selected SNPs was performed
using competitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) chemistry (LGC Genomics). In the
Australian cohort, genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood (Qiagen QIAamp DNA
Maxi Kit) and selected SNPs were genotyped by PCR amplification (Veriti Thermal
Cucler, Applied Biosystems) and bidirectional sanger sequencing
(BigDyeTM v.3.1 Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit and 3730xl DNA
Analyzer, Applied Biosystems). The DBDS replication cohort had existing GWAS
data available from genotyping with Illumina Global Screening Array and
subsequent imputation, as described previously.27 Association testing was done by logistic
regression under an additive genetic model adjusting for sex. With the
availability of GWAS data, the replication results from DBDS were also adjusted
for the first four principal components. Combined analysis of the discovery and
replication stage data was done by fixed-effects inverse variance-weighted
meta-analysis. For the 1p31.1 locus, rs3001038 failed in genotyping of the
Australian cohort and rs998550 was used as a proxy instead. For the 15q22.31
locus, rs62023078 failed in the replication cohorts from SSI and Australia, and
rs13379670 was used as a proxy instead. We considered SNPs with
P < 0.05 in the replication stage and
P < 5 × 10−8 in the
combined analysis to indicate robust evidence of association.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping of KIBRA, APOE variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples were collected from each participant using the Oragene DNA Collection Kit (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada) and sent to the Translational Genomics Research Institute in Phoenix, Arizona for genotyping of KIBRA rs17070145, APOE rs429358, and APOE rs7412. Genotyping was carried out using TaqMan allelic discrimination (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) and ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) as described in Corneveaux et al. (2010) (link). KIBRA rs17070145 (GenBank accession number NC_000005 GPC_000001297, version number NC_000005.10) genotypes were generated using the KASP chemistry (LGC, Middlesex, United Kingdom). In brief, KASP reactions are comprised of sample DNA, KASP Master Mix, and KASP Assay Mix which contains variant specific probe combinations. The DNA samples are then subjected to polymerase chain reaction to generate fluorescent signals that indicate genotypes for the variants of interest. Amplifications errors resulted in undetermined genotypes for four individuals who were not included in the present study. Genotype distributions for our sample were 0.14, 0.37, and 0.48 for TT homozygotes, TC heterozygotes, and CC homozygotes, respectively. Our sample did not violate Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [χ2(1) = 3.03, p = 0.08].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping Wheat Allele-Specific Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GWAM panel was also genotyped with 22 allele-specific markers (Supplementary Table S17) for major genes controlling vernalization response (Vrn-1, Vrn-3), photoperiod sensitivity (Ppd-1) and plant height (Rht-1, Rht-2). SNP marker genotyping was performed using the LGC Genomics KASP chemistry (www.lgcgenomics.com). The detailed protocols used for PCR reaction mixtures and thermal cycling conditions for amplifying SNP and STS markers are described elsewhere18 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cystic Fibrosis Lung Phenotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of FEV1 were collected on a quarterly basis according to international CF care recommendations (Castellani et al., 2018 (link)) and expressed as percent-predicted values (ppFEV1) using Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations (Quanjer et al., 2012 (link)). To assess the lung disease severity, FEV1 were transformed to the Survival Adjusted Kulich Normalized (SaKnorm Z-value) CF-specific lung phenotype. SaKnorm is a quantitative phenotype that allows direct comparison of lung phenotypes between pwCF and accounts for differential survival (Kulich et al., 2005 (link)). Lung function and lung disease severity were analyzed over the last 3 years, except for post–lung transplant patients and patients under CFTR modulator therapy (ivacaftor and lumacaftor-ivacaftor) for whom FEV1 measurements were analyzed over the 3 years prior to the event. SLC6A14 rs3788766 SNP was genotyped using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) chemistry (LGC, Teddington, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!