The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti flag m2

1

Cellular Imaging of Protein Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 or HT-29 cells were fixed and stained with primary antibodies (anti-FLAG M2, β-Catenin (D10A8) XP and E-Cadherin (24E10) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA): 1:50 dilution) as described previously.37 (link) Images were captured by fluorescent microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting for p73 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared in lysis buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 as described (36 (link)). For immunoprecipitation, 0.5–1.0 mg of lysate was used with agarose-immobilized anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Stratagene). Bead-bound proteins were isolated by boiling in 2× SDS sample buffer followed by separation on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Immunoblotting was performed with the following antibodies: anti-p73 (ER15 and GC15, Oncogene), anti-FLAG M2, anti-phosphorylated c-Jun Ser-63 (9261, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-c-Jun (60A8, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Fra1 (R-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-actin (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of S. aureus Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. aureus cell pellets were homogenized with lysing matrix B (MP Biomedicals; 100 mg beads/ml cells) in 25 mM Tris (pH 7.5) on a Retsch MM400 mixer mill at 15 Hz in four 3-min cycles. Clarified lysates were recovered by spinning at 20,817 × g at room temperature for 5 min to remove cell debris. A total of 0.1 to 0.2 A280 units of cell lysate were analyzed on 4% to 20% TGX SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad), and the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a Trans-Blot Turbo system (Bio-Rad). The membrane was stained with Ponceau red (Amresco) to ensure equal loading, followed by immunoblotting using anti-Rnr (1/1,000 dilution), anti-S11 (1/4,000 dilution), anti-HPF (1/4,000 to 1/8,000 dilutions), and anti-FLAG (1/1,000) antibodies. Polyclonal rabbit anti-S11 (25 (link)) and anti-HPF (43 (link)) antibodies were generated and described previously. Anti-FLAG M2 was from Cell Signaling (catalog number 2368). To generate anti-Rnr antibody, two peptides corresponding to residues (234 to 257 and 576 to 595) of the S. aureus RNase R (Cys-234QEAEAVPDHIENTEIKGRHDLRDE257 and Cys-576RKYLIEKSMDNKEVKRWEDK595, respectively) were custom synthesized and used for immunization in New Zealand white rabbits (Pacific Immunology). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated protein A (1/15,000 dilution) was from Cytiva (catalog number NA9120).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing FORCP Protein Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pEGFP-FORCP constructs were generated by cloning the ORF of FORCP-WT or mutant ATG of ORF into pEGFP-N1 vector with Age1/Not1 sites. For pLVX-FORCP 3xFLAG constructs, full length of FORCP-WT or FORCP-mut containing 3xFLAG in its C-terminus was subcloned into lentivirus vector pLVX-PURO with EcoR1/Xba1 sites. The BRI3BP-FLAG-Myc construct was purchased from OriGene technology, USA.
For transfection and immunostaining, 293 T cells were seeded at 300,000 cells per well in a six-well plate. After 24 hr, the cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (life technology Invitrogen) according the manufacturer’s instruction. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were reseeded onto chamber slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Fixed cells were permeabilized by 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min at RT and stained with primary antibodies anti-FLAG M2 (Cell Signaling, rabbit), PDI (Sigma, mouse) or anti-FORCP custom antibody (Abgent) overnight at 4°C. After washing the cells three times with PBS, secondary antibody was added and incubated at RT for 1 hr. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 880 NLO Airyscan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Murine T Cell Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T, B16F10 (High Metastatic Mouse Melanoma), and LLC1 (Lewis Lung Carcinoma) cell lines were from ATCC between 2002 and 2003. Functional-grade anti-mouse CD3ϵ (145-2C11) and CD28 (37.51) were from BD Bioscience. Antibodies for phospho-Lck (Tyr505), phospho-SLP76 (Ser376), phospho-Zap70 (Tyr329)/Syk (Tyr352), phospho-PLCγ1 (Tyr783), phospho-LAT (Tyr220), Lck, LAT (E3U6), CD3ϵ (CD3-12) and anti-Flag (M2) were from Cell Signaling Technology. The rabbit anti-CCDC134 (ab106442) antibody was from Abcam Biotechnology (Cambridge, MA). Biotin anti-mouse CD3ϵ and biotin anti-mouse CD71 (transferrin receptor, TfR) were from Biolegend. Anti-His, and anti-HA antibodies were from Proteintech, and anti-β-actin (C-4) was from ZSGB-BIO.
Fluorescently labeled anti-mouse CD4 (L3T4), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3 (145-2C11), TCRβ (H57-597), CD44 (IM7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD45 (30-F11), CD127 (A7R34), KLRG1 (2F1), PD1 (29F.1A12), Tim3 (B8.2C12) and IFN-γ (XMG1.2) antibodies were purchased from Biolegend. Recombinant mouse IL-2 was from Peprotech. The reagents for mouse IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ ELISAs were from eBioscience.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP Assay for Flag-tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was executed as mentioned previously.18 (link) The antibodies used in this experiment were as follows: anti-Flag M2 (#14793, Cell Signaling Technology) and Normal rabbit IgG (#2729, Cell Signaling Technology). Concrete primers are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB231 and MCF7 cells were seeded in 24-well plates with micro cover glass and transfected with pcDNA3.1-ZNF382-Flag or pcDNA3.1 plasmid. After 48 h, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature, and then blocked with the blocking buffer. After treatment, slides were incubated with anti-FLAG M2 (#14793, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-E-Cadherin (1:200, sc-8426, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), and anti-N-Cadherin (1:200, #610921, BD Biosciences, CA, USA) antibodies at 4 °C. After 20 h, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594- or 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 h at 4 °C in the dark. All slides were counterstained with 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Roche, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Photomicrographs were captured with a confocal laser scanning microscope. All assays were performed three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected COS-7 cells were washed three times with ice cold PBS and scraped in buffer K (1 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EGTA and 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.6) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, # P2714). Cells were mechanically lysed by passing them 10 times with 301/2-gauge needle and small fractions were used to measure the total protein using a Coomassie protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #1856209). Cell lysate was incubated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody for 1 h and immunoprecipitated (IP) using (protein A/G) agarose beads (Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, # SC2003). The supernatants were used to detect actin via western blotting and served as loading controls. Both the supernatant and immunoprecipitated fractions were subjected to electrophoresis on an 8% SDS-PAGE gel. The weight separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with either anti-FLAG M2 (1:1000) or anti-PDI (Cell Signaling Technology, #3501 (1:1000)), anti-actin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #PA1-183, (1:3000)) prepared in 2% BSA in TBS. The blots were washed and probed with HRP-conjugated corresponding secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, #7074, 1:5000 or goat anti-mouse, Thermo Fisher Scientific, #62–6520, 1:5000). The blots were developed in ChemiDocTM-Touch Imaging system from Bio Rad.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flag-tagged Protein Quantification in 293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected 293T cells were lysed with Cell Signaling lysis buffer (Cat#40–040, Millipore, Bellerica, USA). Protein concentration was determined via BCA analysis kit (ThermoScientific, Waltham, USA). Approximately 50ug of protein was loaded into a 12% SDS/Polyacrylimide gel. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose blotting paper via the dry HEP-OWL1 system (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA). Nitrocellulose blots were incubated with Anti-Flag M2 (Cat#2368S, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) and anti-Actin (Cat#4967, Cell Signalling, Danvers, USA) antibodies. Bands were visualized via the Odyssey luminescence scanner (Li-Cor, Lincoln, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

FOXO1 Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto Immobilon-FL membrane and probed for FOXO1 (Cell Signaling, #2880), phospho-FOXO1 S256 (Cell Signaling, #84192), FLAG (Cell Signaling, anti-FLAG M2, #14793). β-actin (Cell Signaling, 4970) was used as loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!