The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chef dr 3

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Italy, China, Canada

The CHEF-DR III is a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) system designed for the separation and analysis of large DNA molecules. It utilizes an alternating electric field to separate DNA fragments ranging from 50 kilobase pairs (kbp) to 10 megabase pairs (Mbp). The CHEF-DR III provides a precise and consistent method for the resolution of high-molecular-weight DNA samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

93 protocols using chef dr 3

1

Genetic Relatedness of CPKP Isolates by PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genetic relationship among the CPKP isolates was determined by PFGE according to standardized protocol [50 (link)] with the XbaI endonuclease (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) by using a CHEF-DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) for the separation of DNA fragments. XbaI-digested DNA from Salmonella enterica serotype Braenderup H9812 was used as a reference size standard, while PFGE patterns were digitally analyzed using the FPQuest (Bio-Rad Laboratories Pty Ltd., Hercules, CA, USA) software package.
PFGE profiles were compared using the Dice correlation coefficient with a maximum position tolerance of 1.5% and an optimization of 1.5%. Similarity clustering analysis was performed by using the Unweighted Pair Group Method using Averages (UPGMA), and a dendrogram was generated. Two PFGE profiles were classified as indistinguishable if the DNA fragment patterns matched each other completely, while clusters were selected using a cutoff at the 80% level of genetic similarity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis for Bacterial Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of isolates was directly prepared from a bacterial cell suspension into agarose blocks and digested with SpeI restriction enzyme (New England, Beverly, MA, USA). Electrophoresis was performed on CHEF-DR III (BioRad, Richmond, CA). The band patterns were analyzed by BioNumerics 2.0 software (Applied Maths, Belgium)17 , 18 and according to Tenover interpretive criteria.19 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Separation of S. ludwigii UTAD17 Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separation of S. ludwigii UTAD17 chromosomal DNA was carried out as described by Sipiczki et al. [71 ] and as modified by El Hage & Houseley [72 (link)]. Briefly, yeast chromosomes were separated in 1% agarose gels in 0.5 x TBE buffer cooled at 12 °C in a BioRad CHEF-DRIII electrophoresis apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Electrophoresis was conducted at 3 V/cm for 36 h with a 200–300 s ramping switch interval and for 60 h with a 300–600 s ramping switch interval. The CHEF-DNA size markers used to calculate the molecular sizes of UTAD17 chromosomal bands were Hansenula wingei, for chromosome bands ranging from 1.05 to 3.13 Mbp and S. cerevisiae (for chromosomes below 1.05 Mbp). The molecular sizes for S. ludwigii UTAD17 chromosomes were then calculated through a calibration curve (band distance vs molecular size) making use of ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast DNA Karyotype Analysis by PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast DNA embedded in agarose plugs was prepared as previously described (Pobiega and Marcand 2010 (link)). Pulse field electrophoresis was carried out in a 0.9% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE at 14°C with a CHEF DR III from Bio-Rad with a switch time ramping from 60 to 120 sec in 24 h (to resolve the whole karyoptype) or with a switch time ramping from 5 to 30 sec in 22 h or 3 to 20 sec in 20 h (to resolve fragments from 20 to 400 kb). For restriction, DNA plugs were equilibrated twice in 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) and twice in restriction buffer (New England Biolabs) prior to addition of the restriction enzyme. The probes for Southern blots were gel-purified PCR products amplified from yeast genomic DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Fingerprinting of Staphylococci by PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular fingerprinting of staphylococci was performed by PFGE using a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, San Diego, USA). Bacterial cultures were grown overnight on Columbia agar supplemented with 5 % sheep blood (BioMérieux) and a cellular suspension of 5 × 109 CFU/mL incorporated into 1.5 % low melting point agarose (BioRad). Discs were immersed into a lysis solution with lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich) (50 μg/ml), lysozyme (Merck) (100 μg/ml) and RNase (Roche) (50 μg/ml) at 37 °C for 3 h. After lysis, discs were incubated with proteinase K (NZYTech, Portugal) (1 mg/ml) for 17 h at 50 °C, followed by overnight digestion with SmaI (Takara) at 25 °C. Digested DNA was submitted to electrophoresis in 1 % agarose gel (Seakem LE) for 23 h at 14 °C and 6 V/cm with pulse times of five to 35 s. Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (BioLabs) 50 μg/ml was used as molecular weight marker. Agarose gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by transillumination under UV (Pharmacia Biotech, Thermal Imaging System FTI- 500). BioNumerics 7.5 software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used to register macrorestriction patterns and clustering analysis was performed using DICE similarity coefficient and the unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MLST and PFGE for CAZ/AVI-resistant K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven conserved housekeeping genes—gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB—were used to perform MLST (http://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/klebsiella/klebsiella.html). Clonal relatedness among CAZ/AVI-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates was established using XbaI - PFGE (TaKaRa). DNA fragments were separated with a CHEF DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). The molecular marker was Salmonella serotype Braenderup strain H9812. The isolates sharing >80% similarity were defined as the same PFGE cluster.22 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chromosome Separation by PFGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To monitor break induction, samples were collected from damage-induced cohesion experiments before, and 1 hr after galactose addition. DNA plugs were prepared and run on 1% pulsed-field grade agarose gel with Bio-Rad CHEF-DR III as described (Desany et al. 1998 (link)). Initial switch time was set to 35.4 sec and the final to 83.6 sec, with 120° switching angle for optimal separation of chromosomes in the size range of chromosomes III and VI. The gel was run at 6 V/cm, at 14° for 24 hr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PFGE Genotyping of CRP-bla(NDM-1)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of CRP harboring blaNDM-1 was performed via PFGE. Chromosomal DNA was digested with 50U of SmaI (Takara, Dalian, China) for 3 h at 30 °C. Genomic DNA was separated by CHEF DRIII (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) gel electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel in 0.5 × TBE at 14 °C. The operating conditions are as follows: voltage, 6 V/cm; switch angle, 120°; switch time, 5–20 s for 19 h. XbaI-digested Salmonella Braenderup H9812 was used as the size ladder. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (Macklin, Shanghai, China), digitally photographed with Gel DocTM XR+ (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and normalized as TIFF images. The DNA patterns were analyzed using BioNumerics software v7.6 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) to establish a dendrogram of strain relationships. UPGMA was used as a clustering algorithm and the Dice correlation coefficient was used with a 1.2% position tolerance. The strains with more than 85% similarity were considered to be related.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of Digested BACmid DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated BACmid DNA was digested overnight using NheI restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs) at 37°C. Digested DNA fragments were then subjected to 1% agarose pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE; Bio-Rad) using 0.5% Tris/borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer and the following conditions: 6 V/cm, 120° field angle, and a switch time linearly ramped from 1 to 5 s over 14 to 15 h (CHEF DR III; Bio-Rad). DNA bands were visualized by staining the gel with a solution of 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide; excess stain was washed away with deionized water, and the gel was imaged on a ChemiDoc Touch imaging system (Bio-Rad). A DNA molecular weight standard (Bio-Rad; CHEF DNA, size, 8 to 48 kb) was used as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pyomelanin-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used six pyomelanin-producing mutants of P. aeruginosa (suffixed with ‘pm’) and their non-pyomelanin-producing parents (suffixed with wt, for wild-type). Each clinical pair (A, B, C and D) was isolated the same day in the same specimen from the same patient. The genetic similarity of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates was investigated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE; CHEF-DR III; Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) with the use of DraI enzyme, as described elsewhere (Supporting Information fig. S3; Talon et al., 1996 (link)). We also used two derivatives from the reference strain PAO1: the mutant PAO1::hmgA with hmgA gene inactivated with the transposon ISphoA/hah (Jacobs et al., 2003 (link)) and the mutant CIP fortuitously isolated from PAO1 culture on agar containing 0.25 mg/l of ciprofloxacin. Table 1 details the characteristics of the clinical isolates and the patient source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!