The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Octopus 900 perimeter

Manufactured by Haag-Streit
Sourced in Switzerland

The Octopus 900 perimeter is a diagnostic instrument used for visual field testing. It is designed to assess and analyze the visual field of a patient's eyes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using octopus 900 perimeter

1

Standardized Assessment of Glaucoma Progression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAP was evaluated using the Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) and the G standard white/white TOP program. All SAP tests were required to meet reliability criteria. SAP tests were defined as abnormal when they met one of the following conditions: (1) the presence of three or more adjacent points in the superior or inferior field with p < 5% probability of normal range and one or more points with p < 1% probability of normal range or (2) the presence of two or more adjacent points with p < 1% probability of normal range and one or more points with p < 2% probability (Wen et al., 2015 (link)). POAG patients were divided into the mild–moderate stage [mean deviation (MD) scores < 12 dB] and severe stage (MD scores ≥ 12 dB) groups according to Hodapp–Parish–Anderson's criteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Octopus Perimetry for Glaucoma Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland) with the G1 pattern (consisting of 59 locations in the central 30 degrees) was used to measure the visual field. In some of the healthy subjects, only the TOP strategy was used to ascertain that visual fields were normal. These fields were not analyzed further. In the patients with glaucoma and the healthy subjects who underwent the extended routine examination as participants in the Erlangen Glaucoma Registry study, two full-threshold measurements were performed. In addition to the standard global parameters (mean defect [MD] and pattern standard deviation [PSD]), mean deviation in the locations that coincided with the annular test field of the LED stimulator (MD6 degrees) was calculated by averaging the antilogarithm of the defect values for 8 (out of 59) Octopus G1 field locations (23, 24, 28, 29, 32, 33, 38, and 39) and subsequently calculating the logarithm of this average. For these calculations, data were exported from the Haag-Streit EyeSuite software and analyzed with the R statistical programming language and the visualFields package.42
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visual Field Assessment in POAG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAP was evaluated with the Octopus 900 perimeter to test the visual field (VF) (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland), G standard white/white TOP program. All SAP tests were required to meet reliability criteria. VF tests were defined as abnormal when they met one of the following conditions: (1) the presence of three or more adjacent points in the superior or inferior field with P < 5% probability of normal range and one or more points with P < 1% probability of normal range; (2) presence of two or more adjacent points with P < 1% probability of normal range and one or more points with P < 2% probability. Patients with POAG were further divided into mild–moderate stage (mean deviation (MD) scores < 12 dB) and severe-stage (MD scores ≥ 12 dB) groups according to Hodapp–Parrish–Anderson criteria [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Ophthalmic Assessments in EAU

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline either with Tono‐Pen (XL, Reichert Technologies, Depew, USA) or Perkins handheld tonometer(Clement Clarke, Harlow, UK), and at follow‐up by Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT 900; Haag‐Streit Diagnostics, Köniz, Switzerland), iCare tonometer (iCare, Helsinki, Finland) or Perkins handheld tonometer.
Automated perimetry was performed with the Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag‐Streit Diagnostics, Köniz, Switzerland), using 30‐degree G‐TOP test.
The OCT of the ONH was obtained by the Optovue Avanti (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA, USA). We used a non‐contact confocal microscope (ConfoScan 4; Nidek Technologies Srl, Padova, Italy) for measuring ECD. Corneal diameter, AL and CCT were measured with Nidek A‐scan Optical Biometer (Nidek Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). In the EAU cases, AL and CCT were obtained by Nidek US‐500 A‐scan/pachymeter (Nidek Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and a manual calliper for measuring the corneal diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ophthalmic Genetics and Retinopathy Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individuals were evaluated in ophthalmic genetics or retina clinics. VA was measured using Snellen and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Kinetic perimetry was performed using either the Goldmann perimeter or the Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland). Full-field electroretinograms (ERG) were performed using Burian Allen electrodes and custom ERG systems at both institutions with previously described parameters at MEE [39 (link),40 (link)] and International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standards at CEI [41 (link),42 (link)]. Retinal imaging included fundus photography (Topcon Medical Systems, Oakland, NJ; Optos, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT: Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany; Cirrus, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF; Spectralis; Optos).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Octopus 900 Perimeter Visual Field Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland) with G2 pattern of the central 30 degrees VF (phases 1 and 2, which provide doubled threshold determination) and dynamic strategy were applied for all examinations. Current ametropia was corrected for according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Only reproducible tests with <20% false-positive and 20% false-negative response rates were used for evaluation. The software-provided 10 VF cluster MDs were used [14 ] (Figure 1(a)). The clusters of the left eyes were mirrored and numbered the same as those of right eyes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Ophthalmic Assessments for Glaucoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Annual visits included a complete ophthalmological examination including slit lamp inspection, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, funduscopy, standardized qualitative and quantitative analyses of color photographs of the optic nerve head, white-on-white standard automated perimetry (SAP). Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy was performed at baseline using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT) for objective measurement of the cup-disc-ratio.
Full threshold measurements (3 phases) were performed with the Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Schlieren, Switzerland) using the G1 pattern that covers the central field up to 30° eccentricity. The first three measurements were excluded from the analyses to mitigate learning effects. Visual field defects were defined as a loss of > 10 dB in one and > 5 dB in at least two adjacent location or as a loss > 10 dB in two adjacent locations.
Using color fundus photographs, ONH morphology was classified according to the criteria by Jonas and coworkers [5 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Contrast Threshold Measurement via Octopus 900

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) was used to measure contrast thresholds by presenting circular achromatic luminance increments on an achromatic background of 10 cd/m2. Experiments were driven by the Open Perimetry Interface (OPI)32 . Fixation was monitored visually, using the instrument’s fixation monitor. A 1:1 staircase and yes/no response criterion were used to determine individual thresholds. Presentation duration was 200 ms, with a square wave temporal profile. Stimuli were consecutively presented to 12 visual field locations (4 locations at each of 12.7°, 21.2°, and 29.7° eccentricity, Fig. 1).

Visual field locations tested in the current study. A conventional 24-2 visual field pattern (right visual field), used in clinical visual field tests, is displayed for clinical reference.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Octopus 900 Perimetry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same calibrated Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz-Berne, Switzerland) was used for all tests. The G 2 test of the central 30° visual field (phases 1 and 2, which provide doubled threshold determination) was tested with normal (bracketing) strategy within 3 months from the OCT imaging (typically on the same day). Current ametropia was corrected for according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Artificial tear drops were given before the 5-minute adaptation period. The right eye was tested first in all cases. Only reproducible tests with less than 20% false positive and 20% false negative response rates were used for evaluation. The manufacturer-provided 10 visual field clusters [23 (link)] were used (Fig 1). The clusters of the left eyes were mirrored and numbered as those of right eyes. For the cluster structure-function investigation the software-provided uncorrected cluster MD values (in dB) were used. In the normal (bracketing) strategy 4.0 dB luminance steps are used to determine the threshold sensitivity, which is refined using 2.0 and 1.0 dB steps. Of the global indices mean sensitivity (MS) and mean defect (MD) were analyzed. In Octopus perimetry the abnormal MD values are positive numbers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ophthalmic Examination and Electrophysiology Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ophthalmic examination included visual acuity (VA, using Snellen visual acuity charts), color vision (Ishihara plates) and color fundus photography, either 35° (Topcon Great Britain Ltd, Berkshire, UK) or ultra‐widefield (200°) confocal scanning laser imaging (Optos plc, Dunfermline, UK). Fundus autofluorescence was performed with 30 or 55° Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering Ltd, Heidelberg, Germany), or ultra‐widefield Optos (Optos plc) imaging with excitation wavelength 488 and 532 nm, respectively. Spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering Ltd) and kinetic visual fields (Goldmann or Octopus 900 Perimeter; Haag‐Streit) were performed.
Electrophysiological testing included full‐field and pattern electroretinography (ERG; PERG) and incorporated the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standards (Mcculloch et al., 2015 (link)). Pattern ERG testing included recordings to standard (15 × 11°) and large (30 × 22°) stimulus fields (Lenassi, Robson, Hawlina, & Holder, 2012 (link))Additional On–Off ERGs (Sustar et al., 2018 (link)) and S‐cone ERGs (Perlman, Kondo, Chelva, Robson, & Holder, 2020 (link)) were performed according to previously described methods (Audo et al., 2008 (link); Georgiou et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!