The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using power scan ht

1

Determination of Renin Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of renin inhibition was based on the method by Li et al.16 (link) The human recombinant renin inhibitor screening kit was employed as follows: (1) blank: 20 μL of substrate, 160 μL of buffer, 10 μL of distilled water; (2) sample: 20 μL of substrate, 160 μL of buffer, 10 μL of sample solution. Then 10 μL of renin enzyme solution were added to the control and sample wells to start the reaction. Meanwhile, 10 μL of the buffer were added to the blank wells. Then, it was let rest at 37 °C for 15 min.
The synthetic fluorescence resonance energy transfer peptide utilized in this assay is the usual substrate for renin. It is linked to a fluorophore at one end and a nonfluorescent chromophore at the other. After the peptide is cleaved by renin, the product is highly fluorescent and can be easily analysed by recording the fluorescence intensity (FI) on a fluorescence plate reader (Powerscan HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, U.S.), with an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength of 528 nm. The analyses were performed in triplicate. The renin inhibitory activity was calculated as follows:where: FI (blank) was the absorbance of blank, FI (sample) was the absorbance in presence of sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Intracellular Calcium Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intracellular calcium concentrations were measured by detecting the fluorescence of cells treated with a calcium-sensitive indicator, Fluo-4 AM [17 (link)]. L6 cells harvested 10 days after differentiation were re-plated in the 96-well plates (Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) at 1.5×104 cells/well for 24 h. Subsequently, the Ca2+ levels were determined with the use of Calcium Kit II-Fluo 4 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) using Powerscan HT (BioTek, VT, US). Briefly, cells were washed twice with non-serum medium containing 2.5 mM probenecid in 24 h after re-plating. Then cells were incubated with 4 μg/ mL Fluo-4 AM and 0.025% (w/v) Pluronic F-127 for 30 min in dark at 37°C. After washings twice with non-serum medium, cells measurement was performed on a Powerscan HT instrument with an excitation band of 485/20 nm and fluorence was measured at 528/20 nm. Baseline signals (F0) were recorded 5 min before the addition of each stimulus. Subsequently, continuous fluorescence measurements were performed for 20 min. Results are shown as F/F0 ratios after background subtraction, where F was the fluorescence signal intensity and F0 was the baseline intensity, as calculated by the average of 5 frames before stimulus application [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Luciferase Expression Optimization in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase synthesis from Luciferase T7 Control DNA plasmid (L482B, Promega) was examined using E. coli T7 S30 Extract System (L1130, Promega). The complete protocol for reaction mixture and final solution preparation was followed as described elsewhere38 (link). Peptide concentration of 2, 10, 30, 60 and 100 μM were used for our analysis. Kanamycin (500 μg/mL) and RNase free distilled water was taken as a positive and negative control, respectively. Luciferase Assay Reagent (E1500, Promega) was used to monitor the luciferase luminescence and the samples were measured using a spectrophotometer (Powerscan HT, Biotek Instruments, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Canine Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Canine mononuclear cells (MNCs) obtained from Yamaguchi University were resuspended in DMEM (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) with 10% FBS and were used as effector cells (37 (link),38 (link),42 (link)). Target cells (CHO-K1, CHO/dHER2, and SNP) were labeled with 10 µg/ml Calcein AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) (31 (link),39 (link)–41 (link),43 (link)–53 (link)). The target cells (2×104 cells) were plated in 96-well plates and mixed with effector canine MNCs (effector/target cells ratio, 50), 100 µg/ml of H77Bf or control dog IgG. Following incubation for 4.5 h at 37°C, the Calcein release into the medium was analyzed using a microplate reader (Power Scan HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc.,) with an excitation wavelength (485 nm) and an emission wavelength (538 nm).
Cytolyticity (% lysis) was calculated as follows: % lysis=(E-S)/(M-S) ×100, where ‘E’ is the fluorescence in cultures of both effector and target cells, ‘S’ is the spontaneous fluorescence of only target cells, and ‘M’ is the maximum fluorescence following the treatment with a lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM of EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ADCC induction by EpMab-37-mG2a-f

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADCC induction by EpMab-37-mG2a-f was assayed as follows. Six female BALB/c nude mice (five-week-old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. Spleens were aseptically removed, and single-cell suspensions were obtained through a sterile cell strainer (352360, BD Falcon). Erythrocytes were removed with treatment of ice-cold distilled water. The splenocytes were resuspended in the medium; this preparation was designated as effector cells. Target cells (BT-474 and Capan-2) were treated with Calcein AM (10 μg/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The target cells (2 × 104 cells) were mixed with effector cells (effector-to-target ratio, 100:1), 100 μg/mL of EpMab-37-mG2a-f or control mouse IgG2a in 96-well plates. After incubation for 4.5 h at 37 °C, the Calcein release into the medium was measured with an excitation wavelength (485 nm) and an emission wavelength (538 nm) using a microplate reader (Power Scan HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Cytolyticity (% lysis) was determined as follows: % lysis = (E − S)/(M − S) × 100. “E” is the fluorescence in the presence of both effector and target cells. “S” is the spontaneous fluorescence in the presence of only target cells. “M” is the maximum fluorescence by the treatment with a lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM of EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hydrogen Peroxide Scavenging Ability Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogen peroxide-scavenging ability of Ser-PAMAM-Cys was evaluated by the BES-H2O2 probe method with a slight modification [16 (link)]. In brief, Ser-PAMAM-Cys and Cys were added to 1,000 µM hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 250 µM (as the thiol concentrations in PBS) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in the dark. About 20 µL each of the mixture and 5 µM BES-H2O2 were reacted for 30 min. The fluorescence intensity of these samples was measured in a microplate reader (PowerScan HT, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Intracellular ROS Measurement in Z. mobilis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zymomonas mobilis TISTR 548 cells were grown on YPD medium at 39°C. At 12 h, 5 μM H2DCFDA was added to the first culture, and further cultivation was performed at 39°C for 30 min. Then, cells were harvested by low-speed centrifugation and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline [130 mM NaCl, 10.8 mM Na2HPO4, 4.2 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 7.2)]. The washed cells were disrupted by sonication for 30 min using an ultrasonic cell disruptor (Bioruptor; Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan) and subjected to low-speed centrifugation. Supernatant fluorescence was measured using a microplate reader (POWERSCAN® HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, United States). Protein concentration was determined using the Lowry method (Dulley and Grieve, 1975 (link)). The result obtained for intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels is expressed as fluorescence intensity per protein concentration, and the ratio of the number of cells grown in the presence of a metal ion to that of cells grown in its absence was estimated and expressed as percentage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ADCC Assay for Evaluating Cytolytic Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADCC assay was performed as previously described [16 (link),19 (link),20 (link),21 (link),22 (link),23 (link),24 (link),25 (link),26 (link)]. Briefly, canine mononuclear cells derived from dog blood were obtained from Yamaguchi University and resuspended in DMEM with 10% FBS to be used as effector cells. Target cells (D-17 and A-72) were labeled with 10 μg/mL calcein AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and resuspended in the same medium. The target cells (2 × 104 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates and mixed with effector cells (effector/target cells ratio, 50:1), 100 μg/mL of E134Bf or the control dog IgG. After 4.5 h of incubation at 37 °C, the release of calcein into the supernatant was measured in each well. The fluorescence intensity was determined using a microplate reader (PowerScan HT; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 538 nm. Cytolytic activity (% lysis) was calculated as follows: % lysis = (E − S)/(M − S) × 100, where E denotes the fluorescence measured of the combined cultures of the target and effector cells; S, the spontaneous fluorescence of the target cells only; and M, the maximum fluorescence measured following the lysis of all cells with a buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 10 mM EDTA. All experiments were conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Intracellular Calcium Dynamics in L6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular calcium concentrations were measured by detecting the fluorescence of cells treated with a calcium-sensitive indicator, Fluo-4 AM [54 (link)]. L6 cells harvested 10 d after differentiation were replated in a 96-well plate (Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) at 1.5 × 104 cells/well for 24 h. Subsequently, the Ca2+ levels were determined using a Calcium Kit II-Fluo 4 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) using Powerscan HT (BioTek, VT, USA). Briefly, cells were washed twice with non-serum medium containing 2.5 mM probenecid 24 h after replating. The cells were incubated with 4 μg/mL Fluo-4 AM and 0.025% (w/v) pluronic F-127 for 30 min in the dark at 37 °C. After washing twice with non-serum medium, cells were measured using a Powerscan HT instrument with an excitation band of 485/20 nm, and fluorescence intensity was measured at 528/20 nm. Baseline signals (F0) were recorded 5 min before the addition of each stimulus. Continuous fluorescence measurements were performed for 20 min. The results are shown as F/F0 ratios after background subtraction, where F is the fluorescence signal intensity and F0 is the baseline intensity, as calculated from the average of five frames before stimulus application [54 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Proliferation Assay using MTS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation in vitro was measured using MTS tetrazolium (Cell Titer 96 Aqueous, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cells were plated (500 cells/100 μL/well) in triplicate in 96-well plates. Cell viability was measured every 24 h for 96 h. After adding 20 μL of MTS to the wells followed by a 1-h incubation at 37°C, the absorbance at 490 nm (reference, 630 nm) was read using a microplate reader (Power Scan HT, Bio Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The mean absorbance of the 3-well set was obtained from 0 to 96 h. Statistical significance was analyzed using the standard Student's t-test. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!