The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using tecnai g2 f20 u twin

1

Structural and Physicochemical Characterization of Ausome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stock solution of Ausome was diluted in deionized water and dropped onto a carbon film-coated copper grid. The morphology of Ausome was examined by TEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, USA), and the crystal structure of Ausome was imaged under high-resolution TEM mode. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of Ausome was obtained using a TEM equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS) attachment (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, USA). The hydrated size of Ausome (diameter, nm) was determined using a 633 nm He-Ne laser-equipped ZetaSizer Nano series Nano-ZS (Malvern, UK), and a Zetasizer Software (version 8.01.4906) to collect data.
Thermalgravimetric (TG) analysis was performed to detect the organic and inorganic contents within Ausome. Before lyophilization, the Ausome suspension was desalted using an ultrafiltration centrifuge tube with a molecular weight cut-off of 30 kDa; the weight loss of the Ausome powder was measured using by TGA (TG 290F3, Netzsch, Germany) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min from 34 °C to 600 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanostructured Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition of the obtained products was identified via grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD, D/max-RB, Japan; Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å) in a continuous scanning mode with a scanning rate of 6° min–1 and an X-ray incidence angle of 1°. The morphology and structure were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S4800, Hitachi, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, America) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). The chemical composition was measured by an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer attached to the TEM instrument. The chemical state of the elements in the samples was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB MKII, Thermo VG Scientific Ltd., UK), and the results were calibrated by the C 1s line (binding energy, 284.8 eV). The UV-visible absorption spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5000 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, America).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Material Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The as-prepared samples were subjected to crystallographic studies by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Bruker-AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). The morphology and microstructure of the samples were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Elemental compositions and surface valences were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The specific surface area and pore size distribution were computed using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) from the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm (Micromeritics ASAP 2460, Micromeritics, Atlanta, GA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Material Morphology and Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size, zeta potential, morphology and elemental maps were determined as previously described [19 (link)]. The material morphology, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and corresponding EDS mapping element maps were visualized by TEM (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, US) (ESEM, Quanta 200, FEI). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a DTG-60AH thermogravimetric analyzer (Shimadzu, Japan). The zeta potential and size distribution were measured with a Nano-ZS (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) at room temperature. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained on a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 pore analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, US). Brunauer-Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was used to calculate the surface area and pore size.
The average pore size was measured by the average of the transverse minimum and maximum diameters of each hole (10 holes per sample).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Photothermal Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the PINPs and PINPs@PM were obtained by TEM (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, US). To confirm the PM camouflage, PINPs@PM was denatured and resolved via 10% SDS-PAGE. The protein bands were visualized by Coomassie blue staining. The DLS and zeta potential experiments were determined by a Nano-ZS (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) at room temperature. The temperature alteration of PINPs@PM exposed to NIR at 808 nm for different times (1.0 W/cm2, Laserwave, Beijing, CHN) was recorded with a thermoelectric thermometer (HH806W, Omega, US).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chiral Polyaniline Nanoribbon Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As-prepared chiral polyaniline (0.1 mL) was first diluted in 1.8 mL of good solvent in a test tube in the presence of a uniaxial stretched polypropylene (PP) template. Then, 2.2 mL of poor solvent methanol was added into the above solution. The mixture was vigorously shaken for 1 min and left to stand for days for self-assembly. As-prepared PANI membrane adhere to the PP template was peeled down in THF into the flat macro stripe, and the stripe transformed into a helical macroribbon in THF/iPrOH co-solvents. These macrostructures were recorded by optical microscopy (VHX-5000, Keyence). The stripe or ribbon was transferred on silicon wafer or carbon-coated copper grid for SEM (S-4800 or S-8220, Hitachi, Japan), AFM (M-Pico, Multimode Veeco), TEM and SAED (Tecnai G2 F20U-TWIN, FEI Co., USA) characterization. Dried samples transferred on copper grid and stripes immersed in the solvents of THF and iPrOH in quartz capillaries were used for WAXS characterization, respectively (Xeuss small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering system with Xenocs Cu Kα X-ray source GeniX Cu ULD and Dectris 100 K Pilatus). The ribbon dispersed in co-solvent with different ΦiPrOH were characterised by CD and UV-vis-IR spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liver, spleen and kidney were quickly extracted and immediately fixed into 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 ℃. The whole process took place on ice. The samples were successively dehydrated in ethanol and embedded into Epon. Ultrathin sections of tissues were cut, double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and collected on copper mesh. Section was observed on TEM (TEM-1400 plus, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of Au@Pt NRs was acquired by using a high-resolution TEM (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, OR, USA) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Characterization of Outer Membrane Vesicles from E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, E. coli were cultured as described above, then removed by centrifugation at 5000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant (200 mL) was filtered through a 0.45-µm EPS filter (Millipore), then concentrated to 50 mL using a 50-K ultrafiltration tube. The concentrated solution was further filtered with a 0.22-µm EPS membrane (Millipore). OMVs were collected from the filtrate by ultracentrifugation at 150,000×g for 3 h at 4 °C. The collected OMVs were washed with PBS using centrifugation at 150,000×g for 2 h at 4 °C, then finally resuspended in 400 μL PBS and stored at −20 °C until use. The total protein concentration of OMVs preparations was evaluated using the bicinchoninic acid assay, the results of which were defined as the OMVs WT concentration. The size and morphology of the OMVs were characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN, FEI, USA). The LPS content in OMV was detected by ELISA (CEB526Ge, Cloud-Clone Corp., Wuhan, China) and LAL assay (L00350C, GenScript, Nanjing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of CNT Sponge Microstructure and Electromechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure and morphology of the as-prepared sponges were characterized by SEM (HITACHI S3400). To give an insight of inter-tube structure, TEM (FEI Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN) observations were conducted directly on as-prepared samples. Thin CNT sheets were carefully separated from the CNT materials and directly deposited between two TEM grids to observe their initial inter-tube structure. For the electromechanical tests, the top and bottom surfaces of the CNT sponges were coated with a uniform layer of silver paste and connected by silver wires. During the compression process, the electrical resistance (Keithley 4200 SCS under a bias of 10 mA) was recorded simultaneously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of NPs was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20 U-TWIN). The crystal structure of NPs was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 focus). The composition of NPs was measured by the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Thermo Scientific iCAP 6300). The surface analysis for NPs was completed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi). Zeta potential data was collected by a nanoparticle analyzer (Malvern zetasizer Nano ZS). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were carried out at ambient temperature in a Bruker EMX EPR spectrometer (Billerica, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!