The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eyelink 1000 tower mount eyetracker

Manufactured by SR Research
Sourced in Canada

The EyeLink 1000+ tower mount eyetracker is a high-performance eye-tracking system developed by SR Research. The device is designed to precisely record and monitor eye movements using advanced optical and electronic technologies. It is capable of tracking the position and movements of the user's eyes with high accuracy and sampling rates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using eyelink 1000 tower mount eyetracker

1

Validation of DeepMeaning's Scene Attention Prediction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye tracking data from previous studies (Hayes & Henderson, 2021 (link); Henderson & Hayes, 2017 ; Henderson, Goold, Choi, & Hayes, 2020 (link)) within our lab were used to validate DeepMeaning’s ability to predict scene attention. This global dataset contained 136 indoor scenes and 145 outdoor scenes. Each scene was viewed for between 6 and 12 seconds by between 50–65 observers during a scene memorization task where subjects were told they would later have to perform a scene recognition task. Participant eye movements were recorded using an EyeLink 1000+ tower-mount eye tracker (spatial resolution 0.01°) sampling at 1000 Hz (SR Research, 2010 ). Participants sat 85 cm away from a 21” monitor and viewed scenes that subtended approximately 27° × 20° of visual angle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Sensorimotor Interaction Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental setup combined a high-resolution stimulus display with eye and hand tracking. Display and data collection were controlled by a PC (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card) using MATLAB (version 9.10.0, MathWorks) and the Psychophysics and Eyelink toolboxes (version 3.0.18; Cornelissen et al., 2002 (link); Kleiner et al., 2007 ). Stimuli were back projected onto a 41.8 × 33.4 cm translucent screen with a PROPixx video projector at a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels (120 Hz; VPixx Technologies). Two speakers (S-0264A, Logitech), located 40 cm to the left and right of the screen center, displayed the sound. Observers viewed stimuli binocularly at a distance of 44 cm while their right eye was recorded with an Eyelink 1000 Tower Mount eye tracker (1 kHz; SR Research). The 3D position of each observer’s right index finger was recorded with a 3D Guidance trakSTAR (120 Hz; Ascension Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Eye & Audio Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded with an SR Research EyeLink 1000+ tower mount eyetracker at a sampling rate of 1000Hz. Head movements were minimised using a chin and forehead rest. Audio was recorded using a Roland Rubix 22 USB audio interface and a Shure SM86 cardioid condenser microphone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visual Stimuli Presentation and Eye Tracking Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were displayed on a 21-inch CRT color monitor (ViewSonic P227f, refresh rate = 120 Hz, resolution = 1152 x 854 pixels). A PC computer running custom software developed in Python with the Psychopy library (Peirce, 2007) (link) was controlling the display. Observers sat in a comfortable chair at a viewing distance of 40 cm (screen visual angle: 50.8° x 37.7°) with a forehead rest to stabilize their position. An Eyelink 1000 Tower Mount eyetracker (SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, Ont., Canada) was also connected to our system to control observers' gaze position in Experiments 1 (letter recognition) and 2 (word recognition). In both experiments letters and words were displayed in black (luminance: 0.3 cd/m2) on a light gray background (luminance: 60 cd/m2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Eye Movement and Audio Recording Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In all experiments, eye movements were recorded with an SR Research EyeLink 1000+ tower mount eyetracker (spatial resolution 0.01) at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Head movements were minimized using a chin and forehead rest integrated with the eyetracker’s tower mount. Although viewing was binocular, eye movements were recorded from the right eye only. The experiment was controlled using SR Research Experiment Builder software. Audio was recorded digitally at a rate of 48 kHz using a Shure SM86 cardioid condenser microphone.
In Experiments 1, 4, and 5, subjects sat 85 cm away from a 21” monitor such that scenes subtended approximately 27° × 20.5° visual angle, and audio was recorded digitally at a rate of 48 kHz using a Roland Rubix 22 USB audio interface and a Shure SM86 cardioid condenser microphone. In Experiments 2 and 3, subjects sat 83 cm away from a 24.5” monitor such that scenes subtended approximately 27° × 20.5° visual angle at a resolution of 1024×768 pixels, presented in 4:3 aspect ratio. For both Experiments 2 and 3, data were collected on two separate systems that were identical except that the operating system for the subject computer in one system was Windows 10, and Windows 7 on the other.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Binocular Eye Tracking and Speech Recording

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded with an SR Research EyeLink 1000+ tower mount eyetracker (spatial resolution 0.01) at a 1000 Hz sampling rate. Head movements were minimized using a chin and forehead rest integrated with the eyetracker’s tower mount. Subjects were instructed to lean against the forehead rest to reduce head movement while allowing them to speak. Although viewing was binocular, eye movements were recorded from the right eye. The experiment was controlled using SR Research Experiment Builder software. Scenes were displayed at 1024×768 pixel resolution. Participants sat 83 cm away from a monitor such that scenes subtended approximately 26° × 19° visual angle, presented in 4:3 aspect ratio. Audio was digitally recorded using a Shure SM86 cardioid condenser microphone. Recorded speech was preamplified using an InnoGear IG101 phantom power preamplifier.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Eye-tracking Methodology for Visual Attention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye-movements of the dominant eye were recorded with an EyeLink 1000 Tower Mount eye-tracker in Graz and an EyeLink 1000 Plus Desktop Mount eye-tracker in Munich (SR Research, Toronto, Canada). The experiment was controlled with Experiment Builder software (RS Research, version 1.10.1241). Children were seated in front of a 20-in. monitor (120-Hz refresh rate, 1024 × 768 resolution) in Graz and a 15.6-in. monitor (120-Hz refresh rate, 1280 × 960 resolution) in Munich at a viewing distance of 65 cm. Stimulus presentation was similar at both collaborating sites with an uppercase letter height of about 0.62° of visual angle. Children put their forehead up against a forehead rest to minimize head movements. A 9-point calibration cycle at the beginning and after each break was used to ensure a spatial resolution of less than 0.5° of visual angle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visual Attention Span Task Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VAS task was run inside a dimly lit room and was controlled with Experiment Builder software (RS Research, version 1.10.1241). Children were seated in front of a computer screen (Graz: 120-Hz refresh rate, 1024 x 768 pixels; Munich: 120-Hz refresh rate, 1280 x 960 pixels) at a viewing distance of about 65 cm. To ensure that children looked at the central fixation cross, eye movements were monitored using an EyeLink 1000 tower mount eye tracker in Graz and an EyeLink 1000 Plus desktop mount eye tracker in Munich (SR Research, Toronto, Canada). Eye-movement data were not further analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Eye-tracking Setup for Suppression Task

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded with an SR Research EyeLink 1000+ tower mount eyetracker (spatial resolution 0.01) at a 1000 Hz sampling rate. Subjects sat 83 cm away from a 24.5” monitor such that scenes subtended approximately 26° × 19° visual angle at a resolution of 1024 × 768 pixels, presented in 4:3 aspect ratio. Head movements were minimized using a chin and forehead rest integrated with the eyetracker’s tower mount. Subjects were instructed to lean against the forehead rest to reduce head movement while allowing them to speak during the suppression task. Although viewing was binocular, eye movements were recorded from the right eye. The experiment was controlled using SR Research Experiment Builder software. Data were collected on two systems that were identical except that one subject computer operated using Windows 10, and the other used Windows 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Precise Eye Movement Tracking Experiment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded with an EyeLink 1000+ tower-mount eye tracker (spatial resolution 0.01) sampling at 1,000 Hz (SR Research, 2010b). Subjects sat 85 cm away from a 21-in. monitor, so that scenes subtended approximately 27° × 20.4° of visual angle at 1,024 × 768 pixels. Head movements were minimized using a chin and forehead rest. Although viewing was binocular, eye movements were recorded from the right eye. The experiment was controlled with SR Research Experiment Builder software (SR Research, 2010a).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!