The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quanlynx software

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

QuanLynx is a software solution developed by Waters Corporation for data analysis and processing in analytical laboratories. The software provides a platform for managing, analyzing, and reporting data generated from various analytical instruments. QuanLynx supports the integration and processing of data from multiple sources, enabling efficient data management and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using quanlynx software

1

Quantifying Glutathione Species in Liver Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver extracts were analyzed with a UPLC system (Acquity, Waters, Manchester) coupled to a Time of Flight mass spectrometer (ToF MS, SYNAPT G2, Waters). A 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 mm BEH amide column (Waters), stabilized at 40 °C, was used to separate the analytes before entering the MS. Solvent A (aqueous phase) consisted of 99.5% water, 0.5% formic acid, and 20 mM ammonium formate while solvent B (organic phase) consisted of 29.5% water, 70% MeCN, 0.5% formic acid, and 1 mM ammonium formate. The extracted ion trace was obtained for GSH (m/z = 308.0916) and GSSG (m/z = 613.1598) and in the case of NAPQI–GSH (m/z = 457.139) in a 20 mDa window and subsequently smoothed (2 points, 2 iterations) and integrated with QuanLynx software (Waters, Manchester).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolic Profiling of Leaf Senescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw Agilent datafiles were converted to NetCDF format and analysed with AMDIS (http://chemdata.nist.gov/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=chemdata:amdis). A home retention index/mass spectra library, built from the NIST, Golm, and Fiehn databases and standard compounds, was used for metabolite identification. Peak areas were then integrated using the QuanLynx software (Waters, Guyancourt, France) after conversion of the NetCDF file to MassLynx format. Statistical analysis was done with TMEV (http://mev.tm4.org/#/welcome); univariate analysis by permutation (one- and two-way ANOVA) was first used to select the significant m etabolites. Multivariate analysis [hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA)] was then carried out in order to establish the metabolite clusters. Only metabolites showing repeatable and significant differences (based on a t-test) according to leaf age and nitrate growth conditions are presented. Absolute quantification was performed by a one-point calibration in splitless mode and another one-point calibration in split mode, using a 4 ng injection of external standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bile Acids Quantification by UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids analysis was performed by UPLC-MS chromatography in an AQUITY I-Class (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) connected to a Xevo-G2 QTof MS detector. Separation was run on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 mm column (2.1 × 100 mm, Waters Corp.) using water and acetonitrile as mobile phases, both containing a 0.1% of formic acid. Mass spectroscopy detection was performed in full-scan negative mode (100 to 1,200 Da). Concentration of bile acid was determined based on standard curves with QuanLynx software (Waters Corp.). Bile acids were extracted using the following methodologies and using chenodeoxycholic acid-d4 (CDCA-d4) as internal standard: lyophilized ileal digesta samples were homogenized in absence of solvent on a TissueLyzer II (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and 20 mg of homogenate were extracted with 840 µL of H2 O: ACN (1:1) including internal standard, respectively. After homogenization, the mixture was centrifuged (15,000 g × 10 min, 4°C) and the supernatant diluted in H2 O: ACN (1:50) for UPLC-MS analysis. Plasma proteins were precipitated by addition of 200 µL of ACN with 5 µL internal standard to 50 µL of plasma. After centrifugation, supernatants were directly analyzed by UPLC analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS Analysis of Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crude bioreactor media was centrifuged and passed through a 0.22 μm filter. A perchloric acid cleanup was used to remove protein and particulate matter, which involved mixing filtered bioreactor media with 0.4 N HClO4 at a 1:1 ratio and centrifuging at 1962g for 5 min at RT. The clarified media was collected to be analyzed by LC‐MS.
A Waters Xevo G2 Q‐ToF (run in ESI‐positive sensitivity mode) coupled to a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I‐Class was used for analysis. We used an Intrada Amino Acid column (Imtakt) to perform normal phase chromatography and separate the amino acids. The buffers used were A: acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid and B: 100 mM ammonium formate, with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min, a gradient time of 15 min, and column temperature of 40°C. Amino Acid Standards (Agilent) were utilized to generate a calibration curve 20–2700 pmol/μL) in the QuanLynx software (Waters), which was used to calculate the concentrations of amino acids detected in the prepared bioreactor media samples. Media samples were run in triplicate, with error bars indicating standard deviations. Additional information on this method can be found in past work (Velugula‐Yellela, Kohnhorst, et al., 2018).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Domoic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired and processed using MassLynx 4.1 and QuanLynx software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The DA concentrations in samples (µg·g−1) were calculated directly from the area responses using a linear seven-point calibration ranged from 0.005–4 µg·mL−1. The confirmatory guidelines for DA were in agreement with the performance criteria of European Commission (EC) Decision 2002/657/EC [39 ]. The maximum permitted tolerances for the relative retention time and relative ion intensities (ion ratio) should be within ± 2.5% and ± 25%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Plasma Lactulose and D-Mannitol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of plasma lactulose and d-mannitol concentrations were performed in an Acquity UPLC (Waters Corp., Mildford, MA, USA) connected to a Xevo-G2 Qtof mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Mildford, MA, USA) operating in full scan negative mode (100 to 1200 m/z). Chromatographic separation was achieved with a linear gradient using a BEH amide column (21 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters Corp., Mildford, MA, USA) and mobile phases comprising A = 10 mM ammonium acetate in ACN:H2O (9:1) and B = 10 mM ammonium acetate in ACN:H2O (4:6). Flow rate was set to 0.5 ml/min and oven temperature to 40 °C. Leucine-enkephalin (200 ng/ml) was used as lock mass. Data processing was performed with QuanLynx software (Waters Corp., Mildford, MA, USA). Ion areas were used for quantification based on standard curves prepared using authentic standards and raffinose as internal standards (IS). Plasma samples (25 µL) were submitted to protein precipitation with 56 µL of IS solution. Four independent replicates per sample were prepared and analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using the nanoACQUITY UPLC system combined with a Xevo G2 QTof mass spectrometer (Waters, Warsaw, Poland). The analyzed compounds were separated in the HSS C18 column with a membrane inline filter (Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, United States) at 45°C. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water, while mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile with an increasing gradient. The total run time of the method was 4 min, with a flow rate of 45 μl/min. Mass spectra for the analyzed compounds were acquired in positive ion mode electrospray ionization. Data acquisition was performed by means of the MassLynx Software (Waters, Warsaw, Poland), using the characteristic precursor and product ions. A quantitative analysis was performed using the QuanLynx software (Waters, Warsaw, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Seedling Metabolome Analysis by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolome analysis was performed as previously described [58 (link)]. Four pools of 20 seedlings per condition were used for metabolome analysis. Approximately 30 mg of the ground frozen seedling samples was analyzed by an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (GC) coupled to an Agilent 5975C mass spectrometer (MS). Standards were injected at the beginning and end of the analysis. Data were analyzed with AMDIS (http://chemdata.nist.gov/mass-spc/amdis/ accessed on 5 December 2013) and QuanLynx software (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Jasmonates and Salicylates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JA and JA-IL levels were quantified using an ethyl acetate extraction method in conjunction with HPLC/MS similar to that described in Chung et al. (2008 (link)). Briefly, samples (approximately 150 mg tissue) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and hormones were extracted using 1 mL of extraction solvent (80:20 methanol:water + 0.1% formic acid) for 18 h at −20 C. Extracts were then centrifuged (10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) and the supernatant was transferred to autosampler vials. Five μL of each supernatant were injected into a Waters UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm; 1.7 μm particles) held at 50°C on a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) Acquity ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system that was coupled to a Waters Quattro Premier XE tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer. Separation was performed using a linear gradient based upon 0.15% aqueous formic acid (A) and methanol (B) over a 3-min program using a total flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Quantification of JA and SA was performed using electrospray ionization in negative-ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), using m/z 209 ≥ 59 for JA, m/z 322 ≥ 130 for JA-IL (Chung et al., 2008 (link)), and m/z 137 ≥ 93 for SA (Zeng et al., 2011 (link)). Peak areas were integrated, and calibration curves generated, using Waters QuanLynx software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amino Acid Analysis of Bioreactor Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For amino acid analysis by LC–MS, crude bioreactor media was centrifuged and passed through a 0.22 μm filter. A perchloric acid cleanup was used to remove protein and particulate matter, which involved mixing filtered bioreactor media with 0.4 N HClO4 at a 1:1 ratio and centrifuging at 1,962g for 5 min at RT.20 The clarified media was collected to be analyzed by LC–MS.
A Waters Xevo G2 Q‐ToF (run in ESI positive sensitivity mode) coupled to a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I‐Class was used for analysis. We used an Intrada Amino Acid column (Imtakt USA) (100 × 2 mm, 3 μm particles) to perform normal phase chromatography and separate the amino acids. The buffers used were A: acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid and B: 100 mM ammonium formate, with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min, a gradient time of 15 min, and column temperature of 40°C. Amino Acid Standards (Agilent) were utilized to generate a calibration curve (9 to 900 pmol/ l) in the QuanLynx software (Waters), which was used to calculate the concentrations of amino acids detected in the prepared bioreactor media samples. Media samples were run in triplicate, with error bars indicating SDs. Injection order was randomized to eliminate order bias. Additional information on this method can be found in past work.20
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!