The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using anti cd81

1

Exosome Immunoprofiling by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunoprecipitation of exosomes and their subsequent analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), 4 μm-diameter aldehyde/sulphate latex beads (Interfacial Dynamics) were incubated with purified anti-CD9 or anti-CD24 (BD Biosciences) or anti-ADAM-10 (Abcam, UK) antibodies at 22°C overnight at gentle agitation, as previously described. For FACS analysis, 30 μg of exosomes were incubated with 3 × 105 anti-CD9, anti-CD24 or anti-ADAM-10 beads in 150 μl of PBS at 4°C overnight at gentle agitation. The reaction was stopped by incubation of exosome-bead complexes in 0.2 M glycine for 30 min. The exosome-bead complexes were washed twice with FACS buffer (3% exosome depleted FBS in PBS). The beads-bound exosomes were then incubated with human IgG (BD Biosciences) at 4°C for 30 min with subsequent washing with FACS buffer and incubation with fluorescein-conjugated anti-CD9, anti-CD24, anti-CD63, anti-CD81 or isotype antibodies (all from BD Biosciences) for 40 min at room temperature at gentle agitation. The complexes were washed twice, suspended in 300 μl of FACS buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry using FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and FACS Diva 6.1 Software. The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the stained exosomes was analyzed as compared to isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Antibody Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies were used at 1–2 μg ml−1 for immunoblotting: anti-ADAM10 (mouse monoclonal, Abcam ab73402), anti-CD63 (mouse monoclonal, BD Biosciences 556,019), anti-CD81 (mouse monoclonal, BD Biosciences 555,675), anti-Haptoglobin (rabbit polyclonal, Biozol, GTX 112,962–25). The following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG (both from Life Technologies) and anti-mouse IgG-HRP conjugate and anti-rabbit IgG-HRP conjugate (both from Cell Signaling).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extracellular Vesicle Characterization by ExoView

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both CVL‐derived and dendritic cell LK23‐derived EVs were diluted 1 : 1000 and incubated on ExoView (NanoView Biosciences, Brighton, MA, USA) chips that were printed with anti‐CD63 (BD Biosciences, Cat#: 556019) and anti‐CD81 (BD Biosciences, Cat #: 555675) antibodies. After incubation for 16 h, chips were washed as per the manufacturer's protocol and imaged in the ExoView scanner by interferometric reflectance imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Monoclonal Antibodies for HCV Neutralization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mAbs used for neutralization assays were specific for antigenic regions 2 to 5 (AR2A, AR3A, AR4A, and AR5A), domain D (HC84.26), or AS412 (AP33, HC33.4, and 3/11) with control antibody b6 (27 (link), 28 (link), 34 (link), 41 (link)–44 (link)). AP33, HC33.4, and 3/11 Fab fragments used in neutralization assays or ELISA were prepared as described (45 (link)). sCD81-LEL was also used for neutralization assays (41 (link)) and ELISA (R&D Systems, catalog no.9144-CD). For receptor blocking assays, we used anti-CD81 (BD Pharmingen, catalog no.JS81), anti–SR-BI C16-71 (46 (link), 47 (link)), or anti-LDLr 3D8 (48 (link)) with the control antibodies 553447 for CD81 and antibody D for SR-BI (46 (link)) and a previously described in-house produced isotype-matched control for LDLr (48 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying HCV Cell Surface Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Huh-7.5 cells were pre-chilled at 4 °C for 1 h and then treated with HCVcc (MOI = 0.01) in the presence of various concentrations of the test compound at 4 °C for an additional 3 h. Following virus adsorption, the cell monolayers were washed twice with ice-cold PBS before fixation with pre-chilled 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma). Detection of cell surface-bound virus through ELISA was performed as previously reported27 (link) using the anti-HCV E2 primary antibody (1: 20,000; Austral Biological, San Ramon, CA, USA), followed by a goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (1: 36,000; Invitrogen), and developed with a TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine) Two-component Microwell Peroxidase Substrate Kit (KPL; Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Results were measured with an ELx800 Microplate reader (Instrument, Inc.; Winooski, VT, USA) at 450 nm and data were expressed as fold change of A450 nm readings. Anti-CD81 (10 μg/ml; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) treatment and the Huh-7-derived S29 cells, which lack CD8135 (link), were included as positive controls, whereas DMSO (0.5%) treatment served as negative control. A schematic for the procedure is depicted in Fig. 6a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Porcine cATMSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porcine cATMSC-EV were identified by bead-based flow cytometry, screening for EV and MSC markers. EV were covalently coupled to 4-μm aldehyde/sulphate-latex beads (Invitrogen-ThermoFisher Scientific) with a 15 min incubation, and then blocked for 2 h with BCB buffer (PBS, 0.1% BSA, and 0.01% sodium azide (NaN3); Sigma Aldrich). EV-coupled beads were centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min and re-suspended in BCB buffer. Next, beads were incubated for 30 min at RT with the fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies anti-CD73-PE and anti-CD90-PE-Cy7 (1:50; both from BD); or the primary Ab anti-CD9 (Clone VJ1/20; 1:10), anti-CD63 (Clone TEA3/18; 1:10), anti-CD81 (Clone 5A6; 1:10), anti-CD29 (1:10; BD), anti-CD44 (1:10; AbD Serotec) or IgG isotype control (1:10; Abcam) followed by incubation with the FITC-goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgG (1:10; Bionova) or A488-rabbit anti-rat IgG (1:100; AbD Serotec). EV-coupled beads were washed with BCB buffer and spun down at 2000×g for 10 min after each step. Data was acquired in a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD), and analysed with FlowJo® v10 (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Analysis of CD81 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 × 106 HepG2 or HEK293T cells were detached from the cell culture plate using Accutase (Stemcell technologies #07920) and washed twice in PBS + 2%BSA. Cells were then incubated in 100 µl of PBS + 2%BSA + Anti-CD81 (BD Biosciences #555675, clone JS-81, 1/200 dilution) for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were then washed three times in PBS + 2% BSA and incubated in 100 µl of PBS + 2 %BSA + anti-mouse FITC (Biolegend # 406001, 1/2000 dilution) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Cells were then washed three times in PBS + 2%BSA and fixed with 4% of paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min and washed in PBS + 2%BSA before flow cytometry analysis on a BD FACSCanto II.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of hMSCs and Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The StemPro Differentiation Kit (Life Technologies) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations to determine the capacity of hMSCs to undergo adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Characterization of hMSCs and hMSC-microvesicles was performed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) utilizing a FACSCalibur™ sorter (BD Biosciences) and analyzed by CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). FITC-conjugated antibodies (anti-CD73, anti-CD90, anti-CD105, anti-CD146, anti-CD14, anti-CD34, anti-CD45, and anti-HLA-DR; BD Biosciences) were incubated with samples for 30 min in PBS containing 0.5% BSA at 4 °C. Mouse isotypic IgG was used as a control.
FACS analysis of hMSC-exosomes was performed using exosome capture beads based on anti-CD63 coupled antibody (Invitrogen Dynabeads Exosome Human CD63 Isolation/Detection Reagent) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Specific FITC-conjugated exosomal markers (anti-CD9 and anti-CD81; BD Biosciences) were used as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HCV Antibodies and Recombinants Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human monoclonal antibodies AR3A, AR4A, and AR5A against HCV structural proteins were produced as described previously [27 (link);33 (link)]. Antibodies against HCV receptors were anti-CD81 (BD Pharmingen Cat. JS81), anti-SR-BI C16-17 [67 (link);77 (link)] and polyclonal anti-LDLr (R&D Systems Cat. AF2148). Control antibodies for receptor blocking assays were the isotype antibody 553447 for CD81, the antibody D for SR-BI [77 (link)], and a goat IgG (R&D Systems Cat. AB-108C) for LDLr. Soluble CD81 protein was a kind gift from Steven Foung [73 (link)]. Adapted recombinants with the core-NS2 sequence from genotypes 1a (H77), 2a (J6), 3a (S52), 4a (ED43), 5a (SA13) and 6a (HK6a) and UTR´s as well NS3-NS5B region from genotype 2a (JFH1) with or without HVR1 were described previously [44 (link);54 (link);58 (link)–61 (link)]. H77 E1E2 expression plasmids, previously validated for functionality in HCVpp assays [67 (link)], were used for E1/E2 interaction studies. Plasmids with point mutations were generated by conventional cloning techniques (Fusion PCR and Quikchange). The HCV sequence of the final plasmid DNA preparations were confirmed by direct sequencing (Macrogen). Antibody against NS5A, 9E10 [61 (link)], was provided by Charles Rice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Single-Cell Sorting for Molecular Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before sorting, cells were washed twice in 1× PBS buffer (DPBS without calcium chloride and magnesium chloride; Sigma Aldrich, D8537) and labelled with 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen, 51-68981E) for live/dead differentiation and FITC-conjugated antibody [anti-CD47 (BD Pharmingen, 556045) for A375 and anti-CD81 (BD Pharmingen, 551108) for Jurkat]. After washing off the unbound antibodies in 1× PBS, cells were resuspended in BD FACS Pre-Sort Buffer (BD, 563503). Single cell sorting in 8-tube PCR strips was done using a BD FACSJazz Cell Sorter. A375 cells were sorted in 7 μl 1× PBS buffer and Jurkat cells in 8 μl lysis solution [100 μl 10× Lysis buffer (Takara, 635013), 5 μl RNase Inhibitor (Takara, 635013) and 700 μl water]. Following sorting, tubes were sealed and subjected to a quick spin and immediately frozen on dry ice and finally stored at −80°C until use. All sorting experiments included negative controls (no cell in a well).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!