The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Seqscape software v3

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

SeqScape Software v3.0 is a genetic analysis software designed for sequence alignment, mutation detection, and data analysis. It provides a comprehensive platform for researchers to manage and process DNA sequencing data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using seqscape software v3

1

Genotyping and Sequencing of Parvovirus B19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for genotyping were selected to represent all the different geographical regions of the country affected in a certain year. No other selection criteria such as age of the patients or sex were considered. DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol from 200 µl of serum with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen). Viral DNA for sequencing was prepared by nested-PCR using previously described primers e1855f, e1863f, B19-R1 and B19-R2 for amplification of a 1,100-bp region spanning the NS1/VP1-unique region junction (NS1/VP1u)28 (link),33 (link). The PCR products were analysed in a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Products for sequencing were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen).
PCR products were sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies), using the nested PCR primers on a capillary sequencer (models 3130/3500 Avant, Applied Biosystems). Sequences were edited using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Applied Biosystems) and then aligned with references in ClustalW (integrated in MEGA version 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Screening for ALS Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the coding exons and 50 bp of the flanking intron–exon boundaries of SOD1 were PCR-amplified, sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems Inc.), and run on an ABIPrism 3500 genetic analyzer. The exon 2 of HFE was amplified by PCR and analyzed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) (Transgenomic, Inc., Omaha, NE, USA). PCR products with heteroduplex profiles were sequenced on an ABI 3500 sequencer (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) with BigDye termination v.1.1 (Life Technologies) technologies according to standard protocols. Samples with homozygous profiles were coupled with a wild-type reference, denaturated and re-analyzed by DHPLC in order to also detect homozygous sequence alterations. If a mixed profile was positive, the original sample was sequenced. All sequencing products were analyzed with SeqScape Software v.3.0 (Applied Biosystems—Life Technologies). Other ALS-related genes were screened according to previously described procedures [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sanger Sequencing for Mutation Confirmation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the mutations in the patient and both parents, the extracted genomic DNA was used for Sanger sequencing (Estrada‐Rivadeneyra, 2017). For each gene, specific primers were designed. The complete list of primers is presented in Table S1. Applied Biosystems Sequencing Analysis Software v6.0 (Sequencing Analysis Software v6.0, Applied Biosystems, Cat No.: 4474950), and Applied Biosystems SeqScape Software v3.0 were used for Sanger sequencing analysis (SeqScapeTM Software v3.0, Applied Biosystems, Cat No.: 4474978).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phylogenetic Analysis of Challenge Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing data were assembled and edited with the SeqScape software v3.0 (Applied Biosystems). RNA1 and RNA2 complete sequences related to the challenge viruses were aligned and compared to reference nucleotide sequences available in GenBank using the MEGA 7.0 package [43 (link)]. To genetically characterize the viral strains used in the present study, phylogenetic trees based on both genetic segments were inferred using the maximum likelihood (ML) method available in the IQ-Tree software v1.6.9 [44 (link)]. The best fitting model of nucleotide substitution was determined with ModelFinder [45 (link)]. One thousand bootstrap replicates were performed to assess the robustness of individual nodes of the phylogeny, and only values ≥70% were considered significant. Phylogenetic trees were visualized with the FigTree v1.4 software (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 9 February 2022).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating FOXF1 Gene Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of small variants located in the FOXF1 gene was confirmed with Sanger sequencing using the 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific) with customdesigned primers (primer sequences available upon request).
Sequences were aligned and compared with the reference sequences GRCh37/hg19 from the Ensemble genome database (ENSG00000103241), using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific). CNVs were confirmed with SNP array using the Infinium Global Screening Array v1.0 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Array results were analyzed with Nexus Software 9.0 (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sanger Sequencing Variant Confirmation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing was used to confirm possible pathogenic variants remaining after applying filtering steps described above. The fragments were amplified using AmpliTaq Gold® 360 MasterMix and 360 GC Enhancer (Life Technologies). Cycle sequencing reaction was performed with BigDye® Terminator v3.1 (Life Technologies) and subsequent capillary electrophoresis was performed on the ABI 3130xl or ABI 3730 (Life Technologies). Sanger sequencing data were analyzed using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Amplification and Sequencing of MT-CYB Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fragment of the MT-CYB gene was amplified with a set of previously reported primers32 (link). Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed in a 25 μl volume including 2.5 μl of 10 PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each primer32 (link), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 50 ng genomic DNA and 1.25 U BioTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, United Kingdom). Thermocycling included a denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 59 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. Finally, an extension step at 72 °C for 10 min was carried out. Amplicons were purified with the ExoSAP-IT PCR Cleanup kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and sequenced in both directions with the same primers used in the amplification step. Sequencing reactions were prepared with the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v1.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and electrophoresed in an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Chromatograms were visually inspected and edited with the SeqScape Software v3.0, (Life Technologies, Barcelona, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Genetic Analysis of Hemophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from EDTA blood using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN). Sanger sequencing of promoter, all exons and exon/intron boundaries in the F8 gene and VWF gene (exons associated with VWD type 2N) was performed on the ABI3500 Genetic analyzer (Life technologies) and data were analyzed using SeqScape software v3.0 (Life Technologies). MLPA (Multiplex Ligation‐dependent Probe Amplification, MRC Holland) analysis was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol, using a P178‐F8 probe mix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sanger Sequencing Validation of Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing was performed for validation of selected variants. The fragments were amplified using AmpliTaq Gold® 360 MasterMix and 360 GC Enhancer (Life Technologies). Cycle sequencing reaction was performed with BigDye® Terminator v3.1 (Life Technologies) and subsequent capillary electrophoresis was performed on the ABI 3130xl or ABI 3730 (Life Technologies). List of primer sequences can be provided upon request. Sanger sequencing data was analysed using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Life Technologies). Some variants have not been verified by Sanger sequencing, partly due to unavailability of primers for some of these gene, but also due to logistic issues. But variants were thoroughly inspected in BAM files to assure they were likely to be true positive variants (enough coverage and an allele fraction of about 50%, between 30 and 75%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

BRCA1/2 Mutation Screening via Sanger Sequencing and MLPA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of index cases of high-risk families. Sanger sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was performed using BigDye® Terminator kits and read through 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied BioSystems). Mutational analysis was performed with SeqScape Software v3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All index patients were additionally tested for the presence of Large Genomic Rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Specific probes for each exon of BRCA1 (SALSA MLPA P002 and P087 BRCA1 probemix, MRC-Holland) and BRCA2 genes (SALSA MLPA P045 BRCA2/CHEK2 probemix, MRC-Holland) were used. The fragments were measured by capillary electrophoresis using the 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with Coffalyzer (MRC-Holland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!