The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gt3x bt accelerometer

Manufactured by ActiGraph
Sourced in United States

The ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer is a compact, lightweight device that measures and records physical activity and movement data. It features Bluetooth wireless connectivity for data transfer and provides high-resolution, triaxial acceleration data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using gt3x bt accelerometer

1

Hybrid Accelerometer Approach for Activity-related Energy Expenditure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Children wore an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist for 10 hours on each testing day (EX, SED). In addition, children wore a second accelerometer on their non-dominant ankle for the YMCA submaximal cycle test and the 30-minute exercise test (70% individual estimated aerobic capacity) to more accurately measure activity in the seated position on the cycle ergometer. We used this hybrid measure to estimate Activity-related EE, extracted for each child for the entire 10-hour period. All data were validated and scored in ActiLife 6 software (ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA) using Freedson Combination (1998) to calculate Activity-related EE (40 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Physical Activity Energy Expenditure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Children wore an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist for 10 h on each testing day (EX, SED). In addition, children wore a second accelerometer on their non-dominant ankle for the YMCA submaximal cycle test and the 30-min exercise test (70 % individual estimated aerobic capacity) to more accurately measure activity in the seated position on the cycle ergometer. We used this hybrid measure to estimate Activity-related EE [44 (link)]. The 4 h during the morning session were considered in-laboratory time, while the 6 h in the afternoon were considered free-living time. Activity-related EE was extracted for each child for the entire 10-h period, and then separately for the morning (in-lab) versus the afternoon (free-living). All data were validated and scored in ActiLife 6 software (ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA) using Freedson Combination (1998) to calculate Activity-related EE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fibromyalgia Patients' Physical Activity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants answered socio-demographic questions and completed the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) in the Spanish version [26 (link)], the Self-efficacy for Physical Activity Scale (SEPAS) [27 (link)], and the Activity Pattern Scale [28 (link)]. They also wore an ActiGraph (Pensacola, FL, USA) GT3X-BT accelerometer to evaluate their physical activity levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Children's Physical Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PA levels as measured using the ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer. This device assesses body movement on three orthogonal axes and raw data are computed into counts per unit time or “epoch”. We will download and evaluate the raw data in 15-second (s) epochs, since prior research has shown that a 15-s epoch length can reliably capture moderate, vigorous, and sedentary activity in children ages 7-11 years [27 (link)]. Counts per epoch will be used to classify time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity (MVPA) and sedentary (SED) activity based on standardized, age-appropriate cut-point values [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Cardiometabolic Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants attend assessment visits at baseline, end of treatment (10-14 weeks), and follow-up (24 weeks) at the hospital’s translational clinical research center. Assessment visit timing is designed to assess both the immediate and sustained intervention impact. Informed consent is obtained at the baseline visit. At each assessment, participants provide demographic and medical information (eg, medical comorbidities and weight history) and complete self-report measures via REDCap. Physiological measures are obtained by a trained translational clinical research center staff member, and 5-mL samples of blood are drawn. Staff also perform a 6-minute walk test to assess functional exercise capacity [43 (link)]. Participants are asked to wear an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer [44 (link)] for 7 days (minimum acceptable use is 4 days with 10 hours of recorded data) at each assessment. Participants are paid US $100 for completing each assessment visit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Longitudinal Actigraphy and Questionnaire Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following informed consent completion, participants were mailed an assessment packet including an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer (ActiGraph, Pensacola, Florida) on an elasticized waistband, accelerometer instructions, wear log, and postage-paid return envelope. Participants were emailed a personalized REDCap link to a questionnaire battery. Participants received completion reminders until the accelerometer was returned. The same procedures were followed at 12- and 24-weeks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Hand Steadiness During Grip Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer (ActiGraph; Pensacola, FL) was attached to the top of the dynamometer for measuring neuromuscular hand steadiness during all HGS tests. ActiLife software (ActiGraph) was used to initialize the accelerometer at 60 Hz and process accelerometer data. Data were stored in 1-second epochs. The specific beginning and end times of every HGS measurement were recorded to coincide with the time stamps from each HGS measure. Vector magnitude was averaged for the duration of each HGS measurement included in the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Assessment of Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following instruments were used: Short-Form Health Survey—36, to assess the quality of life [19 (link)]; Food Markers Questionnaire, for the quality of food intake [20 ]; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [21 (link)], to assess participants’ cognitive performance; Geriatric Depression Scale and the Baecke Anxiety Scale [22 (link)], for the assessment of mood disorder symptoms; Modified Baeke Questionnaire for the Elderly (MBQE) [14 (link)], for subjective assessment of the level of physical activity; a triaxial accelerometer (GT3X-BT from ActiGraph) for objective assessment of physical activity level (measuring daily mean, METs, sedentary activity, light activity, moderate activity, and vigorous activity).
Participants used the ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer (Pensacola, Florida, USA) for seven consecutive days, using only 4 days (three weekdays and one weekend day) for statistical calculations, following the recommendations stipulated by Freedson et al. [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Postmenopausal Women's Physical Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each participant was provided with an Actigraph GT3X-BT accelerometer (Actigraph, Pensacola, CA, USA) and instructed to wear the accelerometer at the side of the hip for seven consecutive days except during showering, water activities, and sleeping. A diary was also provided, to record the time of the day that the device was worn and removed, time spent outdoors, physical activity performed and any issues that affected their physical activity estimates (for example, health issues resulting in low physical activity). The accelerometer data was recorded at a rate of 50 Hz and transferred into ActiLife v6.13.3 software for analysis. Accelerometer activity was transformed into counts per minute (CPMs) with an activity threshold of 100 CPMs. The ActiLife software analyzed data in epoch lengths of 60 seconds. Physical activity was categorized based on the following Freedson adult cut points of 1 to 99 CPMs (sedentary), 100 to 1951 CPMs (light) and >1952 CPMs (moderate to vigorous physical activity, MVPA) [26 (link)]. MVPA was combined into a single variable due to the low amount of vigorous physical activity recorded in these postmenopausal women [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After confirmation of eligibility, participants were mailed a study information fact sheet and were scheduled for an initial phone session. During this initial session, a study team member reviewed the details of the study, obtained informed consent, administered all self-report outcome measures, and mailed each participant an Actigraph GT3X-BT accelerometer (Actigraph LLC) to measure baseline physical activity. Participants wore the accelerometer for 1 week and returned it by mail. Once adequate wear time was confirmed (at least 4 days with ≥10 h of wear), participants were mailed a treatment manual and a step counter to monitor physical activity, then attended a second phone session with a study interventionist to initiate the INSPIRED program. Over the next 12 weeks, participants engaged in weekly phone sessions with a study interventionist, then completed PP activities and worked towards health behaviour goals between sessions. At the end of the program, participants completed a final phone session, during which they completed all self-assessment measures and a qualitative exit interview, and they wore an accelerometer for 1 week to measure post-intervention physical activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!