The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using titan themis 200

1

Characterization of Printed Oxide TFTs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface topography of printed films was measured via ac-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM, Cipher ES, Oxford Instruments) and surface profilometer (P-7, KLA-Tencor). AFM samples for height profile were prepared by photolithography and wet etching with diluted hydrochloric acid (1:10 in water, v:v). The chemical structure of the ITO was examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB XI+, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source. XPS peaks were calibrated by taking C 1s reference at 284.6 eV. XPS depth profile analysis was performed by mild, destructive in-situ sputter etching using a 2000 eV defocused Ar+ beam, and monatomic mode to achieve the required depth resolution. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Titan Themis 200, FEI) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, super-X, Bruker,) was used to obtain the structure and chemical information on the printed oxide TFT. The crystallization and structural information of the films were obtained using X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker) with Cu Kα radiation. The optical transmittance of the printed TFTs were determined with a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-3600Plus, Shimadzu) with spectrum ranging from 300 to 1200 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

NP Sample Negative Staining for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The NP sample was mixed with acetate buffer (0.125 M CH3COONH4, 0.6 mM (NH4)2CO3 and 0.26 mM tetrasodium EDTA at pH 7.4). The sample (10 μl) was negatively stained with 10 μl of 2% (w/v) of phosphotungstic acid, cast on a 200-mesh carbon coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences) treated in NanoClean 1070, and dried in air. The TEM imaging was performed using a FEI Titan Themis 200 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microstructural Analysis of Semiconductor Wafers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the wafers was studied with the help of a Titan Themis 200 image corrected transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), equipped with a high-brightness field emission gun (X-FEG) electron source and a Super-X detector for energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The heterostructures were investigated at 200 kV by HR-TEM, coupled with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) for elemental line profiling. Prior to analysis, the wafers were mechanically polished and then ion beam milled at a voltage of 3 kV and current of 5 mA until perforation. Ion-beam milling was continued with decrements of voltage and current, in order to remove debris produced by the high voltage ion beam thinning.
For processing the elemental line profiles from EDS data, ImageJ software was used [17 (link)]. The visualization and analysis of crystal structures were made with SingleCrystal® (Oxford, England), and images of simulated crystals were generated using CrystalMaker®, a software by CrystalMaker Software Ltd., Oxford, England [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of In-Nb-Ti-O Thin Film

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The In0.0025Nb0.0025Ti0.995O2 film structure and morphology were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 ADVANCE) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Merlin), respectively. The chemical valence of each element of the In0.0025Nb0.0025Ti0.995O2 film was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, ESCALAB 250Xi), and the spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak (at 284.8 eV). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Titan Themis 200) specimens of the TFT device was prepared by focused ion beam (FIB, HELIOS NANOLAB 450S). The electrical performance of the TFTs and the MIM capacitors were measured by semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keysight B1500A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microstructural Characterization of Synthesized Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesised materials were characterised by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis to gain information on the microstructural features and elemental distribution. Samples were prepared by mixing a spatula tip of the respective dry powder with 300 μL ethanol (>99.9%, LiChrosolve, Supelco) in an Eppendorf tube. The sample was then sonicated for 2 min and left to sediment for 1 min. A volume of 10 μL from the supernatant was then drawn through a holey carbon nickel grid. After drying, most of the materials were analysed on a Talos F200× STEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and TCF-M-5c material by Titan Themis 200 (FEI) STEM equipped with the SuperX EDX system, both operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. High-Angle Annular Dark-Field (HAADF) STEM images were obtained in conjunction with EDX elemental maps. Data was processed using the software Velox (Version 3.0.0.815, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrical tests were performed using a Keysight B1500A semiconductor parameter analyzer and Lake Shore TTPX Cryogenic Probe Station. The focused ion beam for preparing the cross section is FIB, FEI Helios 450S dual beam. The high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) is FEI Titan Themis 200. The EDS result is obtained using Bruker super-X EDS. The Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB Xi+ is used for XPS analysis. Besides, the deposition rates of HfO2 and TaOx films were measured by atomic force microscope (Bruker Dimension EDGE). The optical image of the array is obtained using Leica DVM6. The FE-SEM analysis is using ZEISS Gemini-300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Characterization of NPCNF/S Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8-advance, Bruker) was used to analyze the phase of the sample, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the mass change with temperature in sulfur, NPCNF and NPCNF/S composites under the temperature condition of 10 °C min−1 in air atmosphere. Raman spectra (XploRA PLUS, HORIBA) was tested under a Raman microscope with a wavelength of 523 nm, and the composition and valence of the elements could be determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermo) under 5 kV. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation was used to calculate the specific surface area. The microscopic morphology of the sample was characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Sigma04-55, ZEISS) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, Titan Themis 200, FEI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!