The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cerebus system

Manufactured by Blackrock Microsystems
Sourced in United States

The Cerebus system is a comprehensive data acquisition and analysis platform designed for neural recording applications. It provides the necessary hardware and software tools to record, process, and analyze neural signals from multiple channels simultaneously. The Cerebus system is capable of high-resolution data acquisition, real-time signal processing, and data storage, making it a versatile tool for researchers and clinicians working in the field of neuroscience.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using cerebus system

1

Neurophysiological Recording of Striatal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following recovery, habituation, and training a small craniotomy was made under deep anesthesia and electrode arrays were maintained in position by a micromanipulator (Scientifica). The silicon probe array (NeuroNexus Technology) was slowly lowered in to the dorsal striatum (coordinates relative to bregma medial: 1–3 mm; anterior: 0.5 mm; ventral: −2.5 mm). After >1 hour of recovery recording data was obtained from alert, behaving mice previously trained on the operant task. Broadband (0.1 Hz-7 kHz) data was sampled at 30 kHz from all 64 channels and acquired synchronously with digital and analog signals for behavioral measurements (Cerebus system; Blackrock Microsystems). Zero-phase filtering, spike detection, bandpass filtering, and clustering were performed offline using custom written Matlab programs (written by J.T.D.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neuronal Activity Mapping of Hand Somatosensory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuronal activity was monitored using 16-channel linear probes (V-Probe, Plexon) and amplified and stored using a Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems). Probes were positioned with a stereotaxic system, using the obex as a landmark to locate the CN. Units with RFs on the glabrous surface of the hand were isolated. Responses from 143 neurons were obtained across experimental conditions. Hand mapping revealed that the majority of isolated units had small RFs, confined to a single digit pad or palmar whorl, with the exception of neurons that exhibited PC-like responses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neural Acquisition for Monkey and Human Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Blackrock Microsystems neural acquisition systems during both monkey (Cerebus system) and human (NeuroPort system) research sessions. Both data acquisition systems achieve 3 μVrms of input-referred noise over a bandwidth of [0.3 - 7500] Hz, and sample each electrode with 16 bits at 30 kSps. We refer to the system output signal as our raw signal. Nonactive electrodes with zero firing rates were removed from the analysis. During the session, the monkey’s contralateral hand position was measured for decoder training and hand kinematics were analyzed using an infrared reflective bead tracking system (Polaris, Northern Digital) polling at 60 Hz. Hand velocity was computed from the recorded position of the bead, which was taped to the monkey’s reaching hand.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electrophysiological Recording in Visual Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
“Utah” arrays (10 × 10; Blackrock Microsystems, Salt Lake City, United States) with 96 active channels were implanted in the expected location of the border between V2 and the areas rostral to it, using a pneumatic insertion tool. The position of the array was planned using stereotaxic coordinates (42 ) in vivo and verified with flat-mount histology postmortem (fig. S6). Electrodes were 1.5 mm long and spaced at 400-μm intervals. The raw voltage signal was recorded at 30 kHz using a Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems, Salt Lake City, United States) and high-pass filtered at 750 Hz. Spikes were detected using automatic thresholding of the local signal. After recording, manual spike sorting was performed offline using a Plexon Offline Sorter (Plexon Inc., Dallas, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Decoding Motor Cortical Signals for Movement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We recorded force and neural signals using the Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems, Inc.). We did not attempt to identify spikes belonging to individual neurons, but instead used a simple multi-unit signal, registering a spike whenever an electrode signal exceeded -5 times the RMS amplitude for that electrode, as calculated at the beginning of every session. We computed firing rates as the number of spikes detected in each electrode during each time bin, divided by the 50ms bin duration. We excluded neural channels for which the firing rate, averaged over the entire training dataset, fell below 0.5 Hz. The mean number of remaining channels was 78±8 (mean±1SD).
We fitted an exponential sinusoidal tuning curve to the firing rate data, and identified a preferred direction (PD) for each of the multi-unit signals included in our analyses by assuming a lag of 150ms between neural activity and force. We used bootstrapping with 100 repetitions and a generalized linear model with a Poisson noise model [36 (link)] to compute the statistics leading to the identification of the PD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chronic Neurophysiology in Visual Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neurophysiological data was recorded via chronically implanted multi-microelectrode (“Utah”) arrays that were located in area V4 (monkeys B and F) or V1 (monkey K) (see [19 (link)] for details regarding surgery and implantation). Each electrode was spaced 400 μm from its neighboring electrodes, and 1.5 mm (0.6 and 1.5 mm for monkey K) long. Neural data from monkeys B and F was recorded at a sampling rate of 24414.1 Hz using a Tucker Davis Technology system and at 30 kHz for monkeys K and Br on a Blackrock Microsystems Cerebus System. Following 13 sessions in monkey B and 6 sessions in monkey F, permanent focal aspiration lesions of isohemispheric primary visual cortex (V1) were performed (see [23 (link)] for details). After the lesion, post-lesion data were recorded in 15 and 6 sessions for monkey B and monkey F, respectively. To confirm the visual deficit (scotoma) following the V1 lesion, monkeys performed a perimetry task covering the lower right quadrant (see [20 (link)] for details). Data from monkey K was collected in two sessions. Layer-resolved V1 data was recorded from monkey Br using a linear microelectrode array, consisting of 22–24 active microelectrodes, linearly spaced 0.1 mm apart, with impedances ranging 0.2–0.8 MΩ at 1kHz (UProbe, Plexon). Electrical reference for data from the UProbe was the probe shaft.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Modeling Brain Activity Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Benchtop recordings were taken in both acute and chronically implanted rats in a stereotaxic frame with the head fixed by ear bars and a bite bar. Recordings were referenced to a local reference wire on the implanted electrodes and the stereotaxic frame served as ground. Data were acquired at 30 kHz with a Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems) with 0.25 microvolt/bit resolution. Brain activity was modulated by altering the anesthetic depth during the experiment. This was accomplished by changing the concentration of isoflurane provided, or in several acute studies by transitioning from isoflurane to morphine. In one acutely implanted rat, the electrode was advanced in 50 micron increments over a 600-micron range to observe the spatial localization of multi-unit activity waveforms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrophysiological Signals Analysis in Freely Moving Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrophysiological signals were recorded using the Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems); the electrode impedance of each channel was 0.40–0.60 MΩ, magnified 4000×. The LFP signal was extracted from the raw signal using a 0–250 Hz Butterworth low‐pass filter at a sampling rate of 2 kHz. The spike signal was removed from the raw signal using a 0.25–5 kHz second‐order Butterworth bandpass filter at a sampling rate of 30 kHz. The 50‐Hz power frequency interference and spatial artifact noise in the LFP signal were removed using a least mean square adaptive filter and an adaptive standard average reference filter,31 respectively. Spike was extracted from the raw signal using threshold detection and classified using the Skew‐t algorithm.32 Units with a precise absolute refractory period in the auto‐correlogram were classified as single units. Signal acquisition was performed while the mice were awake and moving freely.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In vivo Motor Cortex Local Field Potential Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vivo local field potential experiments were performed as described previously [67 (link)]. After the 8-week-old mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p.), they were restrained in a stereotactic apparatus. Electrodes (0.21 mm in diameter, a.m. systems, USA) were inserted into the anterior (AP: + 1.9 mm, l: − 1.0 mm, V: − 0.5 mm) and posterior (AP: + 0.5 mm, l: − 1.0 mm, V: − 0.5 mm) of the motor cortex, after which a bare wire was inserted into the cerebellar cortex to serve as grounding reference electrodes. For local field potential recording during IL-1β or IL-1Ra administration, electrodes (0.21 mm in diameter, a.m. systems, USA) were inserted into the anterior or posterior of the motor cortex, respectively, and a cannula was embedded in the lateral ventricle (AP: − 0.4 mm, l: + 1.0 mm, V: − 2.5 mm) for drug delivery. Mice were allowed to recover from surgery for 1 week before intracerebroventricular injection and local field potential recording. Neuronal signals were acquired using the Cerebus system (Version 6.04 BlackRock Microsystems, USA) at a sampling rate of 2 kHz. The power spectral density was analyzed using the Neuroexplorer software (Version 4.0) from 0.5 to 100 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Long-term Neural Signal Recording in Awake Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neural signals were recorded in rats two days after surgery followed by weekly recordings for over two months. Each recording session lasted for 10 min. Data were acquired using a Cerebus system (Blackrock Microsystems, Salt Lake City, UT) and each channel was recorded at 30,000 samples per second. To remove any movement artifacts associated with recording from awake animals, a common average reference was subtracted from each channel21 (link) using a custom-routine in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA). Spikes were detected by signal magnitude excursions of beyond a threshold. Each channel had a specific threshold based on six standard deviations of the baseline noise for that channel. The captured spikes were then sorted for each channel into well-resolved units in Offline Sorter V.3 (Plexon, Inc, Dallas, TX) and confirmed by visual inspections. Peak-to-peak amplitude (Vp-p) and spike rate were calculated for each unit. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for each unit was defined as the mean Vp-p over root mean square (RMS) value of the noise for the corresponding unit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!