The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chromaspro v1

Manufactured by Technelysium
Sourced in Australia

ChromasPro v1.34 is a software application designed for the analysis and management of DNA sequencing data. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for viewing, editing, and interpreting chromatogram files generated by automated DNA sequencers.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using chromaspro v1

1

Phylogenetic Analysis of Gene Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene fragments sequences were corrected with Chromas Pro v1.33 software (Technelysium) and aligned using either ClustalX [58 (link)] or muscle as implemented in MEGA6 [59 (link)]. Alignments were corrected manually under Genedoc software [60 ] when necessary, and recombination in the datasets was evaluated using the Recombination Detection Program (RDP) v4.35 [61 (link)]. Recombination was inferred as true when at least two programs of RDP (RDP, Geneconv, Bootscan, MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan or 3Seq) could detect the same event. Single marker phylogenies were built with MEGA6 using either Neighbor-Joining (with Kimura 2 distance correction method [62 (link)] or Maximum likelihood analyses with 1000 bootstrap replicates. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree was built from the concatenate of all 5 gene fragment alignments, using a Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) analysis. The priors used for the MCMC analysis were based on a GTR+I+G model with 6 types of substitutions, with parameters estimated by maximum likelihood with Modeltest 3.6 [63 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identification of SNPs in Pig NR1H3 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six pairs of primers for pig NR1H3 (NM_001101814) were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (PREMIER Biosoft International, CA, USA). Amplicons of the primers covered all exons of the gene (Table 1 and Fig. 1). PCR products amplified from 10 samples of each group were pooled and sequenced to identify SNPs using Chromas Pro v.1.33 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Helensvale, Australia) and DNAMAN6.0 software (Lynnon, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada).

Six pairs of primers used for SNP identification in pig NR1H3

NameSequences (5′ to 3′)Amplicon regionAmplicon size (bp)annealing temperature
NR1H3-1F: TCCCACTCTGAGGTTCTTTTTExon 123558 °C
R: CTTACGGACCTGACACTGGA
NR1H3-2F:GCCAGGAAAGCCTTAGCACAExon 236160 °C
R: AGGAGGCAAGCAACAGCAAG
NR1H3-3F:CTGAGACCCCCCCTGTGCExon 325959 °C
R: GCCCCTACCTCCTCCAAATC
NR1H3-4F: GAACATTAAGCCTCTTCCATExon 434754 °C
R: TTCCCTCTTTCCTATCAGC
NR1H3-5F: ATCTCTTCCTTGTCTTTACCCExon 5, exon 6 and exon 788956 °C
R: CAATCCCTTTGTGATCTCAG
NR1H3-6F: AGCAGTTTCCTCAGTTGAGCExon 8, exon 9 and exon 10102956 °C
R: AGGGTCAGTACCGTCTTCAC

Structure of the pig NR1H3 gene and the positions of primers used for SNP identification. The thick black lines represent introns; the grey blocks represent exons of the NR1H3 gene; the thin black lines represent positions of amplicons. Pig total DNA was used as PCR templates for the NR1H3-1, NR1H3-2, NR1H3-3, NR1H3-4, NR1H3-5 and NR1H3-6 primers

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Identification by 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All bacterial isolates were identified by the Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. DNA was obtained either by simple freeze-and-thaw procedure as described earlier [36 (link)] or mechanical cell lysis in nuclease-free water with a Retsch mill model MM200 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). If both methods failed, the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The 16S rRNA genes of the obtained DNA were amplified by PCR using primers Eub27f and 1387r in a previously published cycling protocol [90 (link)]. PCR products with correct fragment length were sent for Sanger sequencing at LGC Genomics (Berlin, Germany) using the primer 1387R. Resulting sequences were analysed and trimmed with ChromasPro V1.33 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia) and compared to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database using the nucleotide BLAST function [91 (link)]. All sequences were submitted to NCBI Genbank. Isolates returning identical closest relatives after nucleotide BLAST comparison with (i) the full database and (ii) type strains were excluded from further analysis, resulting in a selection of 16 different isolates for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Identification of Petaurus Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from 179 Petaurus ear tissue samples using the One-4-ALL Genomic Miniprep Kit (BioBasic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) and DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. If the identification to species remained uncertain despite morphological measurements, the mitochondrial (mtDNA) cytochrome b gene was sequenced using primer pair L14724 and H15149 following the instructions by Kocher et al. [26 (link)] and Irwin et al. [27 (link)]. This gene was chosen as it is the most sequenced mtDNA gene for Petaurus species, and therefore, there are numerous accessions available on GenBank in which to compare them [28 (link)]. PCR and post-PCR treatment methods were those of Knipler et al. [25 (link)]. Sequencing was undertaken using a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Pty Ltd., Scoresby, VIC, Australia). A total of 385 base pair sequences were edited and aligned with ChromasPro v 1.33 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Brisbane, QLD, Australia) and BioEdit v 7.2.6.1 [29 ]. MtDNA cytochrome b sequences were then compared to P. b. breviceps and P. norfolcensis cytochrome b sequences through a BLASTN search of GenBank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phylogenetic Analysis of Gene Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene fragments sequences were corrected with Chromas Pro v1.33 software (Technelysium) and aligned using either ClustalX [96 (link)] or MUSCLE as implemented in MEGA, version 6 [97 (link)]. Alignments were manually edited using GeneDoc software [98 ]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed in MEGA6 [97 (link)] using the Neighbor-Joining method [99 ]. Bootstrap analysis [100 (link)] with 1000 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phylogenetic Analysis of Gene Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene fragments sequences were corrected with Chromas Pro v1.33 software (Technelysium) and aligned using either ClustalX [96] or MUSCLE as implemented in MEGA, version 6 [97] . Alignments were manually edited using GeneDoc software [98] . Phylogenetic analyses were performed in MEGA6 [97] using the Neighbor-Joining method [99] . Bootstrap analysis [100] with 1000 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Sequence Characterization of Prosopis Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The forward and reverse sequences were edited with the software Chromas Pro v1 (Technelysium Pty, Ltd.). The DNA sequences of both ends were assembled, using the DNA Baser Sequence Assembler v4.10 software (Biosoft 2012). Sequence editing was done, using the automatic analyses for editing “contig” with default program parameters. To characterize the sequences and observe differences in SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) and indels, multiple sequence alignments were performed using MEGA 6 software [64 (link)] and the ClustalW program [65 (link)]. The sequences were deposited in Genbank with the following codes: P. flexuosa (MK450531), P. chilensis (MK450532), P. alba (MK450533), P. tamarugo (MK450534), P. burkartii (MK450535), P. strombulifera (MK450536) and G. decorticans (MK450537). Cluster analyses were performed using the MEGA 6 program in order to illustrate the differences between species and clusters. Trees were generated using maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) Bayesian methods. All cluster analyses were performed with a bootstrap support of 1000 replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fungal Ribosomal RNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction procedure was performed according to the method described by Borges et al. [62 (link)]. The purity and quantity of the DNA samples were evaluated using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCRs were performed using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a T-Personal thermal cycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). To confirm the genetic identity of the fungus, the ribosomal RNA gene fragment was amplified using the universal primers ITS1 (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) as described previously. The amplified region was analyzed by direct sequencing of the PCR products. Automatic sequencing was performed using a BigDye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit and ABI PRISM 310/3730 XL sequencers (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). Data from ITS sequencing was analyzed with ChromasPro v.1.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia) and Lasergene v.11.0 software (DNASTAR, Inc, Madison, WI, USA). Database searches were performed with the BLAST program at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, Rockville, MD, USA) [63 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Sequencing of ERCC Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood samples were obtained from the three patients after obtaining written informed consent from the parents. Genomic DNA was isolated from white blood cells using standard salt-precipitation methods. Genomic sequence of ERCC8 (NM_000082.3) and ERCC6 (NM_000124.3) were obtained from UCSC Genomic Browser on Human (hg19).
PCR primers were designed using Primer3 software to amplify each of the 12 exons of ERCC8 gene and the 21 exons of ERCC6 gene as well as their flanking intronic sequences (Additional file 1: Table S1). PCR reactions were performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR fragments were run on 1% agarose gel. The fragments were purified using “SIGMA-ALDRICH™” GenElute PCR clean-up kit and then sequenced using Big Dye_ Terminator v1.1 Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequence reaction was purified on Sephadex G50 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Foster City, CA, USA) and loaded into an ABI 3500 Sequencer after the addition of Hidi formamide. Electropherograms were analyzed using Sequence Analysis Software version 5.2 (Applied Biosystems) and then aligned with the reference sequences using ChromasPro v1.7.6.1 (Technelysium, Queensland, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sequencing of ANTXR2 Genomic Variant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic sequence of ANTXR2 (NM_058172.5) was obtained from UCSC Genomic Browser on Human. Primers used for PCR amplification were designed using Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu) to amplify the region surrounding the mutation detected by WGS in exon 4. PCR reactions were performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR fragments were run on 1% agarose gel. The fragments were purified using « SIGMA-ALDRICHTM» kit and then sequenced using the Big Dye_ Terminator v 1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequence reaction was purified on Sephadex G50 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Foster City, CA) and then loaded into an ABI 3100 system after the addition of Hidi formamide. Electropherograms were analyzed using Sequence Analysis Software version 5.2 (Applied Biosystems) and then aligned with the reference sequences using ChromasPro v1.7.6.1 (Technelysium, Queensland, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!