The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ssoadvanced universal sybr green master mix

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The SSoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix is a ready-to-use solution for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) experiments. It contains SYBR Green I dye, hot-start DNA polymerase, and necessary reagents for efficient and sensitive amplification of DNA targets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using ssoadvanced universal sybr green master mix

1

NMNAT2 Expression Analysis in DIV14 Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from DIV14 neurons 6 hrs post treatment using the RNEASY Mini RNA Extraction kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One μg of RNA per sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen). Standard PCR amplification was performed using Sso Advanced Universal SYBRGreen Mastermix (BioRad) using the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Biorad, Hercules, CA). Primers used for detection of NMNAT2 were 5′-cagtgcgagagacctcatccc-3′ and 5′-acacatgatgagacggtgccg-3′ and for GAPDH were 5′-aaggtcatcccagagctgaa-3′ and 5′-ctgcttcaccaccttcttga-3′ (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying P-glycoprotein Expression in Worms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression levels of P-gp genes was determined using qPCR in adult male and female worms. qPCR primers were designed to amplify the genes (Table S1) and specificity was confirmed using BLAST in silico. RNA extracted from pools of adult worms and cell types was extracted with Trizol reagent followed by purification using the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 50 ng of total RNA in a 20 µL volume using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-rad), using random oligonucleotides. qPCR reactions were individually optimized using diluted cDNA synthesized from adult T. canis worms. Specificity was determined using melt curve analysis and sequencing. 18 s RNA was used as a reference gene and amplified using previously described primers34 (link). qPCR was carried out in technical duplicates in a volume of 20 µL with 2 µL of diluted cDNA, 1 × of SSoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-rad) and 0.2–0.5 µM of diluted primers. PCR efficiency was determined for each primer pair using LinRegPCR35 (link) and change in gene expression was calculated using the efficiency corrected ΔCt method based on single samples36 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Evaluation of SYBR Master-Mix Kits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four SYBR master-mix kits were evaluated: ssoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Master-Mix (Bio-Rad), QuantiNova SYBR® Green PCR Kit (QIAGEN), PowerUp SYBR® Green Master-Mix (Applied Biosystems) and RT2 SYBR® Green qPCR Master-Mix (QIAGEN). RPL13a, SDHA, TBP, and IFN-γ primer (Table 2) amplicons were purified by Wizard SV Gel & PCR CleanUp System (Promega) and quantified by NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). Master-mix reaction efficiency was calculated by amplification of amplicons titrated from 107 to 101 copies/reaction, with primers at 250, 500, or 750 nM (45 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative PCR Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Takara Ex Taq Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) was used to perform end-point PCR according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 5.
Conventional quantification of gene or miRNA expression was assessed by qRT-PCR using No AmpErase TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and specific TaqMan gene-expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), as listed in Supplementary Table 4. Amplifications were run on the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System. Data were analyzed by SDS relative quantity (RQ) Manager 1.2.1 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and reported as RQ or −ΔΔCt with respect to a calibrator sample using the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method. GAPDH/SNORA74A and RNU48 were used as normalizers in gene and miRNA expression studies, respectively. If not otherwise specified, MIR205HG/LEADR expression was measured using an assay covering ex-2/3 boundary, which detects all possible transcripts.
Enrichment of DNA regions in ChIP and ChIRP experiments was evaluated through SYBR green qPCR run on a CFX Connect Real-time PCR instrument, using SsoAdvanced Universal Sybr Green Master mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and primers listed in Supplementary Table 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Reverse Transcription and qPCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using an RNeasy Microkit, including DNase incubation, according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Qiagen). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using 0.5 μg of oligo(dT)15‐18 primers, 1.0 mM dNTPs, 1× Reaction Buffer, 20 units of RiboLock, and 200 units of RevertAid reverse transcriptase (all from ThermoFisher Scientific) in a total volume of 20 μl per reaction. The cDNA product was diluted 10‐fold in water and used at this concentration for qPCR. Qualitative PCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Bio‐Rad), with primers at a final concentration of 500 nM from a 10 μM stock. Diluted cDNA (2.5 μl) was used per reaction, and all reactions were performed in triplicate in a total volume of 10 μl. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1, available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.40659/abstract. A 2‐step qPCR cycle with a Bio‐Rad iCycler qPCR machine was used for target amplification, according to the instructions of the manufacturer for SSoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix, and CFX Manager was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Immune Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 5×106 thymocytes using TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen) or RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer protocols. Two-step qRT-PCR was performed by synthesizing cDNA using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (BioRad, Hercules, CA) followed by RT-qPCR relative quantification of 50 ng cDNA per reaction using CFX Connect, SSO Advanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix, and Prime- PCR validated primers for murine GAPDH, Hprt, Tbp, Fas, and FasL (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The data were normalized to the reference genes: Hprt, Tbp, and GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of V. cholerae intIA Transcription

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from co-incubation assays of V. cholerae with T. pyriformis and A. castellanii in 24-well plates. Bacterial cells from within protozoa were collected as described above and RNA was extracted by lysozyme digestion followed by use of the Aurum Total RNA mini kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of RNA was measured by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND-1000; NanoDrop Technologies). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared from 400 ng RNA from each sample by iScript Reverse Transcription (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System using V. cholerae integron-integrase specific primers (intIA-1F/intIA-1R) (Supplementary Table 2). Transcription of intIA was determined relative to the transcription of gyrA (gyrA_F/gyrA_R) (Supplementary Table 2) using the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis of Retinoblastoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from the RB tumors (n = 5) and control retina (n = 2) was isolated by the TRIzol Reagant method. DNA contamination was removed by DNase treatment. The extracted RNA was quantified using a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop spectrophotometer, and cDNA was prepared using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantitative real time PCR (RT-PCR) was then performed in a CFX Real Time PCR Thermo Cycler (Bio-Rad) using the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The primers used for amplification of CD81, CD9, CD63, and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The relative quantity of target mRNA against the standard reference gene (GAPDH) was calculated according to the 2−∆∆Ct method.21 (link) Student's t-test was used to compare the normalized mRNA expression levels. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Embryonic Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) from untreated embryos and those treated with PCP at 24 and 48 hours. Genomic DNA was removed from samples with gDNA eliminator mini spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). iScript (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used to generate cDNA from each sample. Each cDNA sample was made by pooling ten random whole embryos per condition. SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR green mastermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used to amplify genes, with an Eppendorf realplex2 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) machine using primers for ef1α [21 (link)], runx1 [21 (link)], cmyb [21 (link)], and itga2b (commonly referred to as cd41) [21 (link)]. All PCR primers were validated previously and designed to span exons. Data were analyzed for relative expression change with ef1α as the reference gene. ΔΔCt was calculated by comparing the expression of the treated embryos to control embryos and to the reference gene, ef1α.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative and Semiquantitative RT-PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For semiquantitative and real-time reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR, RNA was extracted using the methods described above, and single-strand cDNA libraries were synthesized with DNase I-treated RNA using Superscript III reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) or, in the real-time experiments, iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). For semiquantitative RT-PCR, conditions for PCR reactions were optimized for each gene such that the endpoint of each PCR reaction was in the linear range of amplifications. Transcript-level quantification analyses were measured by analyzing pixel intensity of the bands using Image J (NIH). For quantitative real-time RT-PCR, cDNA samples were analyzed using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories), with each 20 μl reaction containing 10 μl of SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Mastermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories), 2 ng of cDNA, and RT primers designed using PrimerQuest (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) at a final concentration of 300 nM. Before RT-PCR experiments, primer efficiencies were determined from dilution curves (1:10) using the formula: E = 10–1/slope (Pfaffl, 2001 (link)). Fold-change was determined using the ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Primers used in the RT-PCR experiments are listed in Table 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!