The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using kod hot start

1

Cloning and Sequence Verification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cloning was performed using the Infusion system (Takara, 638909) and Stellar competent cells (Takara, 636763) as described by the manufacturer. PCR inserts were generated using GXL polymerase (Takara, R051A) or KOD HotStart (Millipore, 71086) and extracted using a gel extraction kit (Zymogen, D4002). Minipreps were performed using the Monarch system (NEB, T1010L) with vector backbones generated by EcoRI restriction enzyme digestion (ThermoFisher, FD0274, as per manufacturer’s instructions) or PCR with GXL polymerase/HiFi polymerase (Takara, R051A/639298). For the Pbp1-PS/Pub1-PS insertions into Ede1, a BshTI site was generated within the Ede1 construct. The PS domains were inserted into BshTI (ThermoFisher, FD1464) digested vector, removing the remnants of the restriction site. All obtained vectors were sequenced to confirm accuracy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Point Mutations in SAMHD1 Plasmid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Point mutations (D137N, Q548A, D311A, T592A, T592E) in SAMHD1-coding plasmid pcDNA3.1-N-FLAG-SAMHD113 (link) were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using complementary primer containing respective nucleotide exchanges. Mutagenesis PCR was performed with PfuUltra (Agilent Technologies) or KOD Hot Start (Merck Milipore) DNA Polymerase. Non-mutated template DNA was subsequently removed by DpnI (New England Biolabs) treatment of the PCR product. Mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.
The pJO19 HBV coding plasmid was linearized and used as a standard in quantification of HBV DNA copies in quantitative PCR (qPCR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Sequencing of GLUL Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from potential GLUL-KO cell lines using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR using KOD Hot-start (Merck-Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) was then performed to amplify GLUL with primers F: 5′-CTCCAGAACACCTTCCACCA-3′ and R: 5′-ACATTGCTGTCTCACCTTCC-3′. Cycling conditions were programmed as follows: 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 10 s, and 70 °C for 15 s. Further extension was carried out with Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to add 3′ adenine overhangs for cloning into a T-vector containing complementary thymidine residues. PCR products were run on a gel where single bands obtained were extracted using Gel Extraction Kit (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Cleaned PCR products were then transformed in One Shot® TOP10 Chemically Competent E. coli (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a TOPO TA cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Invitrogen) before plating on LB agar plates (2.5% LB broth miller, Merck-Novagen and 1.5% BD Bacto™ Agar, Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA). Colonies were grown in 3 mL LB broth culture (2.5% LB broth miller, Merck-Novagen) before plasmid extraction (QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, Qiagen). Purified plasmids were subsequently sequenced via the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit carried out by 1st Base DNA Sequencing service (Singapore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasmid Cloning and Transfer in Pseudomonas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids are described in Supplementary Table S1 and primers listed in Supplementary Table S2. PCR amplifications were performed using Phusion Hot Start High-Fidelity (Finnzymes, ThermoFisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK), KOD Hot Start (EMD Millipore, Watford, UK) or Taq (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK) DNA polymerases. Recombinant plasmids were sequenced and transferred to P. putida by electroporation (Choi et al., 2006 (link)) or conjugation (Ramos-Gonzalez et al., 1991 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Manipulation of Pseudomonas putida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids are described in Table S1 and primers listed in Table S2. PCR amplifications were performed using Phusion® Hot Start High-Fidelity (Finnzymes), KOD Hot Start (EMD Millipore) or Taq (Roche) DNA polymerases. Recombinant plasmids were sequenced and transferred to P. putida by electroporation (Choi et al. 2006 (link)) or conjugation (Ramos-Gonzalez et al. 1991 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Construction of CRISPR-Cas9 Yeast Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains can be found in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article). Standard molecular biology techniques were used to generate all constructs [35 ]. Strains containing Cas9 were constructed by first creating a CEN-based plasmid including HIS3 UTR sequence, artificial [u2] sequences [36 (link)], and the KanR cassette [37 (link)] using in vivo plasmid assembly [38 (link)]. The entire cassette was PCR-amplified with a high-fidelity polymerase (KOD Hot Start, EMD Millipore) and transformed into yeast using a lithium acetate protocol [39, 40 (link)]. Diagnostic PCRs followed by Sanger DNA sequencing (Genscript) confirmed successful integration.
DNA plasmids generated in this study are in Table S2. Vectors for the AcrII genes were constructed by in vivo assembly under control of prCDC11 and ADH1(t). For all substitutions, the AcrIIA2 and AcrIIA4 expression cassettes were amplified, cloned into a TOPO II vector (pCR-Blunt II-TOPO, Invitrogen), mutagenized by PCR, and sub-cloned to pRS316 using flanking NotI/SpeI restriction sites. Plasmids containing sgRNA cassettes included prSNR52 and SUP4(t) sequences [41 (link)]. All vectors were confirmed via DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Cloning and Mutagenesis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasmids used in this study are described in Table S1. Plasmid DNA was purified using the PureLink Quick (Invitrogen) or GeneJET (Thermo Fisher) Plasmid Miniprep kit. DNA fragments amplified by PCR or obtained from restriction endonuclease digests were purified using PureLink (Invitrogen) or GeneJET (Thermo Fisher) PCR purification kits. Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and Gibson Assembly mix (NEB) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amino acid insertions and substitutions were generated using the QuikChange protocol (Agilent) for site-directed mutagenesis with KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase (EMD Millipore). The Q5 site-directed mutagenesis protocol (NEB) was followed for the generation of TviD1–322 using PaCeR polymerase (GeneBio Systems, Inc.). Gene deletions were generated in pWQ783 using inverse PCR with either KOD Hot Start (EMD Millipore) or Phusion High-fidelity (NEB) DNA polymerase. Primers for inverse PCR were synthesized with a 5′-phosphate to facilitate the ligation of the linear product. Custom oligonucleotide primers used in this study were purchased from Sigma and Integrated DNA Technologies (Table S2). All constructs were confirmed via DNA sequencing at the Advanced Analysis Center at the University of Guelph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanobody Library Cloning and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast obtained after four rounds of MACS selection was plated on YGLC-glu agar to obtain single colonies after 96 h at 30°C. Single yeast colonies were picked and resuspended in 100 μl 200 mM lithium acetate and 1% SDS each. The cell suspension was incubated for 5 min at 70°C and subsequently mixed with 300 μl ethanol and vortexed. The mixture was centrifuged at 15k g for 3 min, the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 100 μl H2O. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15k g for 1 min and 1 μl of the supernatant was used as template DNA for 25 μl PCR reaction (KOD HotStart, Merck) with primers NbLib-fwd-i (CAGCTGCAGGAAAGCGGCGG) and NbLib-rev-i (GCTGCTCACGGTCACCTGG) to amplify the nanobody insert sequence. Nanobody PCR fragments were analyzed on 2% TAE-agarose gels and purified with the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen). PCR fragments were sequenced and individual nanobodies were cloned using the In-Fusion cloning kit (Takara Bio) into a pET28a vector linearised by PCR with primers NbLib_pET28a_fwd (GGTGACCGTGAGCAGCCACCACCACCACCA CCACTGAGATCCGGCTGCTAACAAAGC) and NbLib_pET28a_rev (CCGCCG CTTTCCTGCAGCTGCACCTGCGCCATCGCCGGCT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Engineered S. cerevisiae Strain Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard molecular biology protocols were used to engineer all S. cerevisiae strains (Supplementary Table 1) used in this study58 . The overall methodology for construction of the triple gene drive strain utilized both standard HR-based chromosomal integrations (sans any DSB) and Cas9-based editing (Supplementary Fig. 1). Briefly, DNA constructs were first assembled onto CEN-based plasmids (typically pRS315) using in vivo assembly in yeast59 (link). If necessary, point mutations were introduced using PCR mutagenesis60 (link). Next, the engineered cassette was amplified with a high-fidelity polymerase (KOD Hot Start, EMD Millipore), transformed into yeast using a modified lithium acetate method61 (link), and integrated at the desired genomic locus. PCR was used to diagnose proper chromosomal position for each integration event followed by DNA sequencing. The DNA maps for manipulated yeast loci are included in Supplementary Fig. 2. DNA plasmids used in this study can be found in Supplementary Table 2. Expression cassettes for sgRNA were based on a previous study62 (link), purchased as synthetic genes (Genscript), and sub-cloned to high-copy plasmids using unique flanking restriction sites. All vectors were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mutagenic PCR for GAL Gene Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For high-fidelity PCR reactions we followed manufacturer’s instructions using either Extaq (TaKaRa # RR001C), KOD hotstart (Merck Millipore # 71086) or Q5 (NEB # M0491) with 0.6 µM final concentration primers.
For mutagenic PCR, 25 µl reactions of standard Taq (New England Biolabs # M0273) were used with plasmids bearing WT templates of the GAL genes (pAMN14 (GAL3), pAMN15 (GAL80) or pAMN31 (GAL4)). Initial template concentration was varied to allow 8–12 duplications of template.
Components added to mutagenic PCR (order: Material, volume in µl;): Standard Taq buffer (10 × ), 2.5; 50 mM MgCl2, 2.75; dCTP (100 mM), 0.25; dTTP (100 mM), 0.25; dATP (100 mM), 0.05; dGTP (100 mM), 0.05; MnCl2 (50 mM), 0.25; oligo1 (20 µM), 0.625; oligo2 (20 µM), 0.625; template (5 µl per 50 µl reaction), variable; Taq DNA pol. (5U/ul), 0.25; Water, 14.9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!