The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Trapezium

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Trapezium is a versatile lab equipment designed for a range of analytical applications. It functions as a data processing and analysis software, providing users with the tools to effectively manage and interpret results from various instruments and experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using trapezium

1

Tensile Properties of Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tensile test of films was performed on Texture Analyzer Shimadzu EZ Test LX (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a 500 N load cell, at room temperature, with a strain rate of 5 mm/min. The exact dimensions of the cross-section area and gauge length were accurately determined before each measurement. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity were calculated by software Trapezium (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). A minimum of three measurements was made for each film formulation, and average values were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tensile Properties of Achilles Tendon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the entire Achilles tendon unit to evaluate the mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon, using the uniaxial material test system (Autograph AGS-G; Shimadzu Corp. Ltd.) with a 500 N load cell to measure tensile properties. In order to facilitate grasping during the experiment, the proximal end of the Achilles tendon and the foot of the mice were fixed in a special clamp, and the specimens were pulled at a constant strain rate of 0.5 mm/s. All samples were broken within gauge length. Force data are collected at a frequency of 50 Hz in Trapezium (Shimadzu Corp. Ltd.) software. For each specimen, the stress-strain curve is established from the load-displacement curve, and the Young's modulus of each stress-strain curve is calculated using the cross-sectional area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Compressive Strength Evaluation of Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The compressive strength of the scaffolds was obtained by compressive tests at a rate of 1 mm/min, using a load cell with 100 N capacity (DL3000, EMIC, Brazil). The tests were performed at 23°C using a universal testing machine (Instron 8874, MA, USA). Specimens (n = 5 from each group) were positioned on the testing machine base and subjected to axial compressive loading up to fracture. The compressive force curves were recorded using the Trapezium (Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) software and the compressive strength values were calculated using the equation F/w2, whereas F is the maximum load at fracture and w the cross-section area of the specimen.[21 ]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biomechanical Evaluation of Repaired Tendons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Repaired tendons were moistened with wet gauze prior to testing; all were subjected to linear load-to-failure testing using a tensile test machine (AG-I 10kN; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) (
Fig. 3). The force transducer of the machine was connected to the upper clamp. The force was recorded with a specialized software program (TRAPEZIUM; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The tendon ends were tightly gripped in the upper and lower clamps. The initial distance between the clamps was 5 cm. A preload of 1 Newton (N) was applied before loading evaluation. The overhead crossbar connected to the upper clamp was advanced at a constant speed of 25 mm/min. The preload and the tendon pull rate simulated the loading of a tendon during active finger flexion.
8
The distance between the stumps was monitored by a video camera that had been vertically mounted at the level of the tendon repair site. The pulling force was continuously recorded. Any force that produced gaps evident on the monitor was recorded on the display board; each such force was considered an initial gap force. Any force separating the tendon stumps by 2 mm was recorded as a 2-mm gap formation force. An external observer recorded the initial and 2-mm gap forces. The tendons were pulled until complete pullout or rupture of the sutures occurred. The ultimate strength of the repair was the peak force recorded during the test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Corneal Tensile Strength Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The corneal strips were clamped vertically in the tongs of an electronic universal testing machine (Shimadzu Corporation) with the sclera and corneoscleral tissue both held in the tongs at both ends. The tensile strain test was run at 2 mm/min the initial strain loading to 0.05 N, with the length of the corneal trips between both tongs recorded as the initial length (Fig. 1). The elastic modulus was calculated using the software included with the testing machine (Trapezium; version 1.5.1; Shimadzu Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tensile Strength Testing of Fibroblast Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A uniaxial tensioning apparatus with 5 kN capacity (EZ-L; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) that pulls ring-shaped tissue constructs to failure was used to test the tensile strength of the fibroblast tubes. To conduct the test, a construct that was 5-mm long was placed around two parallel stainless steel wire hooks that were 3 mm apart. The hooks were then pulled apart at a rate of 40 mm/min until tissue failure. The force required was measured digitally using a data acquisition system (Trapezium; Shimadzu Corporation). The tests were filmed to verify that construct failure had occurred in the middle of the tissue away from the hooks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!