The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Micro image

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The Micro Image is a digital microscope imaging system designed for laboratory use. It captures high-resolution images of microscopic samples and provides advanced features for image analysis and processing. The core function of the Micro Image is to enable detailed observation and documentation of microscopic specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using micro image

1

Quantifying Brain Injury Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain injury was evaluated based on microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) and myelin basic protein (MBP) immunostaining. Both hemispheres of each section were measured using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan) after the staining. The MAP2-positive and negative tissue volume, the MBP-positive tissue volume of the cerebral subcortical white matter (SWM) area, and the neuropathological scores of the gray matter in different brain regions were assessed as described previously [30 (link)]. Briefly, the cortical injury was graded from 0 to 4 with 0 indicating the absence of observable injury and 4 confluent infarction. The injury in the hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus was assessed both with respect to hypotrophy (scored from 0 to 3) and injury/infarction (scored from 0 to 3), resulting in a total possible score of 22. All evaluations were carried out by an experienced investigator blinded to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Brain Tissue Loss after HI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain injury was evaluated 8 d after HI based on total tissue loss and neuropathological scoring. The MAP2-positive and -negative areas in each section were measured using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). The volume was calculated from the MAP2-positive areas according to the Cavalieri principle using the following formula: V = ΣA × P × T, where V = total volume, ΣA = sum of area measurements, P = the inverse of the sampling fraction, and T = the section thickness (5 μm). The MAP2-negative volume was the infarction volume. The total tissue loss was calculated as the MAP2-positive volume in the contralateral hemisphere minus the MAP2-positive volume in the ipsilateral hemisphere. The neuropathological scores for the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus were assessed as described previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Wound Healing Assay in PC3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PC3 cells were seeded on 12-well plates and left to reach 100% confluence. Cell monolayers were wounded as described previously [35 (link)] and the medium was exchanged for experimental medium supplemented with 0.5 mM solution of hydroxyurea (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). At the beginning of incubation time (0 h) and after 24 h, cells were photographed with an Olympus DP20 camera (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan), magnitude 40×. Migration was calculated as the difference between the area of the wound after 24 h and 0 h and expressed as % of control (migration assay for control cells). All calculations were performed in MicroImage (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). The experiment was conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Assessment of Brain Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gray-matter area was determined by measuring the MAP2 immunoreactive area from eight serial sections per animal. Brain injury was evaluated by the volume of infarction and total hemispheric tissue loss and neuropathological scoring, which was performed by a person who did not have prior knowledge of the groups. The MAP2-positive and negative areas in each section were measured in both hemispheres using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). The tissue volume was calculated from the MAP2-positive or negative areas according to the Cavalieri principle using the following formula: V = ΣA × P × T, where V = the total volume, ΣA = the sum of area measurements, P = the inverse of the sampling fraction, and T = the section thickness. The total hemispheric tissue loss was calculated as the MAP2-positive volume in the contralateral hemisphere minus the MAP2-positive volume in the ipsilateral hemisphere. The neuropathological score of gray matter from different brain regions was assessed. Briefly, the cortical injury was graded from 0 to 4 with 0 being no observable injury and 4 indicating confluent infarction. The injury in the hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus was assessed both with respect to hypotrophy (scored from 0 to 3) and injury/infarction (scored from 0 to 3), resulting in a total possible score of 2224 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Brain Injury Severity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain injury was evaluated using the total tissue loss volume and neuropathological scoring by a person who did not have prior knowledge of the groups. The MAP2-positive area in each section was measured in both hemispheres using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). The volume was calculated from the MAP2-positive areas according to the Cavalieri principle, using the formula: V =  SA*T*P, where V is the total volume, SA is the sum of area measurements, T is the section thickness and P is the inverse of the sampling fraction. The total tissue loss was defined as the MAP2-positive volume in the contralateral hemisphere minus the MAP2-positive volume in the ipsilateral hemisphere. The neuropathological score for different brain regions was assessed. Briefly, the cortical injury was graded from 0 to 4 with 0 being no observable injury and 4 indicating confluent infarction. The injury in the hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus was assessed both with respect to hypotrophy (scored from 0 to 3) and injury/infarction (scored from 0 to 3), resulting in a total score of 22.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Apoptosis in Injured Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Area contours were drawn and measured in every 50th section. The active caspase-3 and AIF-positive cells (DCA = 7, vehicle = 8, 24 h) were counted at 400× magnification in the border zone of the injured cortex within an area of 0.196 mm2 (one visual field) using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). Three sections were counted from each brain with an interval of 250 μm. The average was defined as n = 1 when comparing different brains. All of the counting was carried out by investigators blinded to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

New Glaresis hespericula Species Description

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were examined with an Olympus SZ61 stereomicroscope, measurements were taken with an ocular grid. The habitus photographs were taken using a Canon MP-E 65mm/2.8 1–5× Macro lens attached to a Canon EOS 550D camera. Partially focused images of each specimen were combined using Zerene stacker software. Male genitalia images were taken with a Provis AX70 (Olympus) microscope with digital image processing capability using Micro Image (Olympus) software.
Specimens of the newly described species are provided with one printed red label:
Glaresis | hespericula sp. nov. | HOLOTYPUS ♂ [or] PARATYPUS ♀ | David Král & Lucie Hrůzová 2018”. Both type specimens are deposited in the National Museum Praha, Czech Republic.
Exact label data are cited for the type material examined. Lines within each label are separated by a single vertical bar “|”. Information in quotation marks indicates the original spelling. Our remarks and additional comments are placed in brackets.
For morphological terms used in the description we largely follow Gordon and Hanley (2014) and Král et al. (2017) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Apoptosis and Neurogenesis in Rodent Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Area contours were drawn and measured in every 50th section. The active caspase-3-positive and AIF-positive nuclei and the 8-OHG-positive cells were counted at ×400 magnification in the border zone of the injured cortex and striatum, cornu ammonis area 1 (CA1), and NH within an area of 0.196 mm2 (one visual field) using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). Three sections were counted from each brain with an interval of 250 μm39 (link). The numbers of Ki-67-positive and DCX-positive cells were counted in the SGZ of the dentate gyrus in three adjacent sections in the hippocampus. The length of the SGZ was measured, and the number of positive cells was expressed as the number per mm. The average was defined as n = 1 when comparing different brains. All of the counting was carried out by investigators blinded to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Neurodegeneration after Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Area contours were drawn and measured in every 50th section. The active CASP3, AIFM1+ cells were counted at 400× magnification in the border zone of the injured cortex or striatum within an area of 0.196 mm2 (one visual field) as well as within the whole CA and DG areas by using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). Fluoro-Jade-positive cells were counted by fluorescence microscopy. Three sections were counted from each brain with an interval of 250 μm. The average was defined as n = 1 when comparing different brains. All of the counting was carried out by investigators blinded to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Brain Injury Assessment via Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain injury was evaluated based on MAP2 and MBP immunostainings. Both hemispheres of each section were measured using Micro Image (Olympus, Japan). MAP2-positive and negative and MBP-positive tissue volume calculations as well as neuropathological scores of the gray matter from different brain regions were assessed as described previously11 (link). The infarction volume was equal to the MAP2-negative volume in the IL hemisphere. MBP tissue loss ratio was calculated as: ((CL hemisphere − IL hemisphere)/CL hemisphere) × 100%. All evaluations were carried out by investigators blinded to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!