The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jamovi v 2

Manufactured by Jamovi
Sourced in United States, Australia

Jamovi V.2.2.5 is a free, open-source data analysis software designed for statistical analysis. It provides a user-friendly graphical interface for conducting a variety of statistical tests and data visualizations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

12 protocols using jamovi v 2

1

Comparative Analysis of Statistical Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data was analysed in IBM SPSS 27 and Jamovi v. 2.3.18. Descriptive statistics as well as the Pearson Chi-square test were used to compare the differences between Latvia and Iceland and within each country.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Menstrual Cycle Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, a descriptive analysis was made using means and standard deviation, analyzing the variables according to the phases of the MC. Then, an inferential analysis was performed with an ANCOVA, a statistical procedure that makes it possible to eliminate the heterogeneity caused by the variable of interest (dependent variable) due to the influence of one of more quantitative variables (covariable, in this case the training sessions). Moreover, the differences among the phases were identified in more detail with Bonferroni’s Post Hoc test. Effect size was calculated using partial Eta2, considering the effect size of 0.01–0.06 as small, 0.06–0.14 as medium and >0.14 as large [39 (link)]. The statistical analyses were performed with jamovi v2.3.18 [40 ]. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Multivariate Analysis of Predicted Microbial Functions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences in predicted function outcomes between the groups were compared using STAMP software v2.1.3 (https://beikolab.cs.dal.ca/software/STAMP). Two-sided Welch’s t-tests and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction were used for two-group analysis. A Kruskal–Wallis H-test with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test and Eta-squared effect size (P < 0.001, Effect size > 0.40) were utilized for multiple group analysis. The other statistical analyses were included in microeco. The LDA score cutoff was set to 4.0 in LEfSe biomarkers analysis. The clinical data of obese patients was analyzed using the open-source software jamovi v2.2.5 with Kruskal–Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Social Science Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 25.0 for Windows was used for most calculations. CFA and multigroup CFA were conducted via AMOS (version 24, IBM, Chicago, IL, United States), and McDonald’s ω was calculated via jamovi V.2.2.5. Descriptive statistics [i.e., frequencies and percentages (%), and means ± standard deviations (SD)] were determined to characterize the demographic data of the sample. A value of p of < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Treatment Outcomes with Statistical Rigor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normality in the data distribution was evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Differences in continuous variables pre- and post-treatment were assessed by a parametric paired samples Student’s t-test or a non-parametric paired samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. Differences in categorical variables were assessed by the Fisher’s exact test or paired samples McNemar’s test, as appropriate. Effect sizes (ES) for significant differences in the values were calculated using Cramer’s V, Cohen’s d, or rank-biserial correlation, as appropriate. Multiple linear regression analysis performed using the enter method was conducted to examine whether changes in predictor variables were associated with changes in PS scores. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and all tests were two-tailed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.21.0 and Jamovi v.2.2.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Diagnostic Agreement for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analysed with the open-source statistical software Jamovi v. 2.2.5 (The jamovi project (2021) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org (accessed on 21 March 2022), sourced from Bergamo, Italy). Qualitative variables are described as frequencies and percentages. Interobserver agreement rates between Reader 1 and Reader 2 on a DIE location-based level were measured through Cohen’s kappa coefficient. According to Fleiss’s equally arbitrary guidelines, a k-value of less than 0.40 was considered a poor agreement; a k-value ranging from 0.40 to 0.75 was a fair to good agreement, and greater than 0.75 was an excellent agreement. Cohen’s kappa scores were also calculated to measure interobserver agreement between Reader 1 and Reader 3 on locations considered positive for DIE on T2*W imaging. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the prevalence of signal voids assessed by Readers 1 and 3 on these sequences. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS V.25.0, AMOS V.23.0, and jamovi V.2.2.5. Enumeration data was described by frequency and percentage (%), and the measurement data was described by mean and standard deviation (SD). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolic Biomarkers and CPET in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to the absence of data on CPET performance and early metabolic syndrome biomarkers in the study population, we set the sample size for this study at n = 14 patients compared to the same number of healthy controls. This number intercepts different expected proportions, with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error ranging from a minimum of 5.21% (for an expected proportion of 1%) to a maximum of 26.19% (for an expected proportion of 50%). Also, it manages to identify differences in mean values between patients and controls in terms of effect size equal to 0.98, with a power of 80% at a significance level of 5% (calculated with the G*Power 3.1 software. 9.7.).
A descriptive analysis of all the parameters collected was performed. Quantitative variables are reported as means and standard deviations (SD). Qualitative variables are presented as frequencies and absolute percentages (%). Student’s t test was used for the comparison of continuous variable and the Chi squared test was used for the comparison of categorical variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to study the relationship between biomarkers, CPET results, and previous cancer treatment. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All statistical analyses were performed with Jamovi V.2.2.5 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The distributions of continuous variables were evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test. Differences between the groups in categorical variables were tested by the χ2 test. Differences in continuous variables were assessed by the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney u-test as appropriate. The correlation analyses between continuous variables were performed using Spearman’s bivariate test, whereas between categorical variables were by Cramer’s V coefficient. A binary logistic regression test was used to examine the relations of the factors with TTH. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and all tests were two-tailed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26.0 and JAMOVI v2.2.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Patient Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were reported as percentages for categorical data, mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed continuous data, and median (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. The paired comparisons between the case and control groups were done with Independent samples t-test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed variables. Additionally, Chi-square test was used to test for significant associations between patients and controls regarding different categorical and ordinal variables. Statistical data processing was performed using the IBM SPSS v.23 statistical package and Jamovi v.22.5. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!