The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using pcrii topo ta vector

1

In situ Hybridization in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antisense riboprobes were generated using Roche DIG and FITC labeling mix. Portions of the coding regions of genes were PCR amplified using One Taq Hotstart 2X master mix in standard buffer DNA polymerase (NEB) and cloned into pCRII-TOPO TA vector (Thermofisher). Sequence verified clones were used to generate antisense riboprobes using appropriate enzymes. The zebrafish dnmt3bb.1 probe was generated as described previously13 (link). Whole mount in situ hybridization was carried out as described previously with a few modifications. To reduce non-specific hybridization and enhance signal to noise ratio we used 5% dextran sulfate (Sigma) in the hybridization buffer and pre-adsorbed anti-DIG and anti-FITC antibodies to whole cavefish powder. For histology, embryos and tissue samples were fixed using 4% para-formaldehyde overnight at 4°C and subsequently passed through ascending grades of alcohol followed by paraffin embedding. Sections were stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In situ Hybridization in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antisense riboprobes were generated using Roche DIG and FITC labeling mix. Portions of the coding regions of genes were PCR amplified using One Taq Hotstart 2X master mix in standard buffer DNA polymerase (NEB) and cloned into pCRII-TOPO TA vector (Thermofisher). Sequence verified clones were used to generate antisense riboprobes using appropriate enzymes. The zebrafish dnmt3bb.1 probe was generated as described previously13 (link). Whole mount in situ hybridization was carried out as described previously with a few modifications. To reduce non-specific hybridization and enhance signal to noise ratio we used 5% dextran sulfate (Sigma) in the hybridization buffer and pre-adsorbed anti-DIG and anti-FITC antibodies to whole cavefish powder. For histology, embryos and tissue samples were fixed using 4% para-formaldehyde overnight at 4°C and subsequently passed through ascending grades of alcohol followed by paraffin embedding. Sections were stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Lentiviral Expression of Chicken pre-miR-194

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken genomic DNA was extracted from E9 retina using a Genomic DNA Mini Preparation Kit with Spin Column (Beyotime, Nantong, China). The concentration and purity of DNA were determined by the Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chicken pre-miR-194 was amplified from the genomic DNA using GoTaq Green 2X Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) with specific primers (Supplementary Table S1). The PCR reaction started with 5 min denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The 532 bp PCR product was cloned into a PCRII TOPO TA vector (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), confirmed by sequencing, and subcloned into a lentiviral expression vector (CD512B-1, System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) using the restriction enzymes of BamH I and Not I (Fermentas in Thermo Scientific, Grand Island, NY). The recombinant vector was termed lenti-pre-miR-194, and the empty vector lenti-RFP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Amplification and Sequencing of SOX5 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The complete coding sequence (CDS) of SOX5 gene was amplified from a HD B cell cDNA sample as a 3.1 kb PCR fragment using proof-reading Phusion DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs). PCR products were subcloned into the pCRII TOPO TA vector (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
DNA sequencing was performed by an ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer (PE, Applied Biosystems). Sequencing data were analyzed using the DNA Sequencing Analysis software version 3.4 (PE Applied Biosystems) and Sequencer version 3.4.1 (Gene Codes Corporation). Assembly, alignment and analysis of DNA sequences were performed by DNASTAR Lasergene software version 8.0 (DNASTAR, Inc.). Cloning and sequencing primers are provided in the table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Complementation Assay for pmrA and pmrB Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplified pmrA and pmrB genes from the respective E. coli strains were directly inserted into the pCRII-TOPO TA vector, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, USA). Since the pCRII-TOPO TA vector is a high-copy-number plasmid that may lead to overexpressed cloned genes, which might constitute a bias in our experiments, wild-type pmrA or pmrB genes from MG1655 were directly inserted into the pCRII-TOPO TA vector as controls in the complementation experiments. The resulting plasmids were separately transformed into identified colistin-resistant strains, E. coli MG1655_ΔpmrA or MG1655_ΔpmrB via electroporation. The transformants were selected by overnight incubation at 37°C on kanamycin (50 mg/liter)-supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar, and the presence of the cloned gene was verified via PCR sequencing. The designations of all E. coli transformants are shown in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Xenopus laevis sulf1 and sulf2 expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers that cover 80%−100% of X. laevis sulf1 and sulf2 coding regions were designed based on the nucleotide details NM_001097379.1 and NM_001094945.1 respectively from the NCBI database. The 6‐O‐endosulfatase genes were amplified from cDNA reverse transcribed from RNA extracted from stage 38 and 42 X. laevis embryos. PCR products of the respective genes were cloned into pCRIITOPO TA vector (supplied by Invitrogen NZ) and the plasmids were linearized via PCR with the M13 sequencing primers prior to RNA probe synthesis. Digoxigenin labelled RNA probes were synthesized and whole mount in situ hybridization was carried out following procedures previously described by Pownall et al. (1996) with modification for limb samples as in McEwan et al. (2011).
Samples were photographed in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) on 1.5%−2% noble agar using a Leica Fluo III dissecting microscope and accompanying Leica camera and LS software. All figures were processed and compiled in Adobe Photoshop CS5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ciona 5-HT Receptor Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ciona 5-HT receptor sequences were identified by BLAST search on the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, last accessed on 27 February 2023) and ANISEED (http://www.aniseed.cnrs.fr/, last accessed on 27 February 2023) databases by using as queries different vertebrate sequences encoding for each class of receptors and PCR-amplified from cDNA of C. intestinalis embryos (sequences and primers are listed in the Supplementary Materials, Additional File S1, Tables S1 and S2). The amplicons were sequence verified (Eurofins Genomics, Vimodrone, Milano, Italy) and cloned into a pcRII-TOPO-TA vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The isolated cDNA clones were also used as a template for antisense and sense riboprobes for the in situ hybridization experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generating Runt Transcription Factor Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The runt-VWRPY+ 10,050 bp genomic fragment, was amplified from w1118 fly genomic DNA using Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche) and cloned into pCR II-TOPO TA vector (Invitrogen). An AvrII site was introduced abutting the runt stop codon. The fragment ends are defined by primers: 5′-GGAAAAGTGTGTGGAAAACGGTGGA and 5′-GCAACCCAAATGTCTTGTGAAATGAA. The runt-VWRPY+ construct was modified to runt-∆WRPY and runt-WRPW using PCR to amplification to change the C-terminal amino acids. The entire runt coding sequences, including modifications, were introduced into the genomic clone using an AscI site located in the runt 5′ UTR and the introduced AvrII site and confirmed by DNA sequencing. All Runt domain mutations: Cys-127-Ser and Lys-199-Ala, Arg-80-Ala, Arg-139-Ala, Arg-142-Ala, Arg-174-Ala, Arg-177-Ala mutants were generated in pCR II-TOPO TA vector using QuikChange site directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent). The wild type and the respective modifications were confirmed by DNA sequencing. All constructs were cloned, using vector derived EcoRI sites, in the pattB transformation vector kindly provided by Johannes Bischof, Basler lab, Zurich. Transgenic injections were carried out by Genetic services Inc. MA. Constructs were inserted into fly genomic attP2 site on the third chromosome by targeted φC31 mediated specific insertion (Venken et al. 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In situ Hybridization for Zebrafish Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization to detect transcripts in whole embryos was performed as previously described [34 (link)]. The cxcr4a probe was previously described [35 (link)]. To generate all other probes, RNA was extracted from pooled 48 hpf WT embryos using the Qiagen Micro RNeasy kit (Qiagen, 74004). cDNA was produced with the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad, 1708890), and the following primers were used to amplify gene-specific cDNA using standard TAQ polymerase. ahr1a: forward primer CGGCATGAGTTTCAGAGACA and reverse primer AAGAGGCAGGATCAGAAGAT, ahr1b: forward primer CCAGAAAGGAGCAGGTACGGATGAAGTTAC and reverse primer GTTGACGGCTGTCTGCGAGAGGG, ahr2: forward primer GATGGAGTCAACTTCTCAGAAGGGGAGC and reverse primer ACTACTAGTATCCATTCCCTCTTGGATGTTCATTC, cyp1a1: forward primer CGGAAACAACCCACATTTGAGTCTGAC and reverse primer CGGTGAACTTTAACCTTTGCAGCAGGAT, cyp1b1: forward primer CGAATGGCTCAGAAATACGGCGAC and reverse primer TGGACCAGCACAGACGTGAAGAGGAA, glut1: forward primer GCAGGAGGAACTCAATGCTC and reverse primer TGGACCAGCACAGACGTGAAGAGGAA. These PCR amplicons were TOPO cloned into the pCRII-TOPO TA vector from Invitrogen (Invitrogen, 450640), and digested/sequenced to determine orientation for antisense probe generation following linearization of the plasmid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vitro Synthesis of RNA Standards for RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA transcripts were synthesized in vitro and used as standards in the development of the RT-qPCR assays essentially as described previously [39 (link)]; basically, PCR products containing the qPCR target sequences were produced by conventional RT-PCR as described above, and cloned into pCRII-TOPO TA vector (Invitrogen). After sequencing verification of the obtained clones, RNA transcripts were synthesized using MEGAscript T7 (Ambion) and SP6 (Roche) Transcription Kits, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Removal of the DNA template from the in vitro transcription reaction was done with TURBO DNase (Ambion) as described in manufacturer’s instructions. Standards were quantified using NanoPhotometerTM P-Class P330 (IMPLEN) and the number of standard copies per nanogram was calculated using the following equation: copies per nanogram = (NA x A) / (n x mw), where NA the Avogadro constant (6.02 x 1023 molecules per mole), A the amount of the standard in g, n the length of the standard in nucleotides, and mw the molecular weight per nucleotide (considering average molecular masses of 340 Da for one nucleotide of single-stranded RNA). All primers used for standards preparation are described in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!