The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xl30 feg sem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Netherlands

The XL30 FEG-SEM is a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It provides high-resolution imaging and analysis capabilities for a wide range of materials and applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using xl30 feg sem

1

Fixation and Dehydration Protocol for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at 12,000 cells/cm2 on functionalized leaves and glass coverslip. After 72 h, they were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 1X PBS overnight at 4°C. Samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (50, 70, 85, 95, 95, 100, 100%) for 1 h each and left overnight in 100% ethanol at 4°C. Samples were left to dry on pin stub mounts (12.7 mm × 8 mm, Ted Pella) and sputter coated with gold (1 0 nm) prior imaging to the Eyring Materials Center at Arizona State University with a SEM-FEG XL30 (FEI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Decellularized Scaffold Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Decellularized scaffolds were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS overnight at 4 °C. Samples were then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (50, 70, 85, 95, 95, 100, 100%) for one hour each and left overnight in 100% ethanol at 4 °C. Samples were mounted on pin stubs (12.7 mm × 8 mm, Ted Pella) and sputter coated with gold (10 nm) under vacuum for direct SEM imaging or with carbon for EDS. Samples were imaged at the Eyring Materials Center at Arizona State University with a SEM-FEG XL30 (FEI) and EDS data acquired using Genesis Spectrum software version 5.21. (EDAX Inc., New Jersey, USA https://www.edax.com/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Fungal Conidia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy, conidia were harvested from strains grown on GMM agar for 5 days and fixed with osmium tetroxide for 72 h. Fixed conidia were sputter coated with gold and visualized using an accelerating voltage of 7 kV on a FEI XL30 SEM-FEG. For transmission electron microscopy, conidia were harvested from strains grown on GMM agar for 5 days and then fixed with 4% formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 1x PBS for 24 h at 4°C. Samples were washed twice with PBS for 10 min and then stained for an hour with osmium tetroxide. Conidia were washed twice with PBS and once with 0.1N acetate buffer for 10 min. Then, conidia were stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate for an hour. After staining, conidia were washed twice using 0.1N acetate buffer for 10 min each. Samples were dehydrated using serial washes of 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100% ethanol twice for 10 min at each concentration. Samples were embedded using the SPURR Low Viscosity Embedding Kit. Samples were then thin sectioned and stained using 1% uranyl acetate and 0.4% lead citrate. Conidia were visualized using an accelerating voltage of 80 kV on a FEI Tecnai G2 Twin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Porous PCL Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scaffolds were woven from multifilament PCL yarns (EMS-Griltech, Domat, Switzerland) using a custom-built weaving machine, as previously described [7 (link)]. For this study, 7 layers of yarns were axially oriented in alternating x and y directions with a third set of fibers passing through the thickness of the structure (z-direction). Total void space within the scaffold was ~61% with interconnected rectangular pores measuring approximately 350 μm × 250 μm × 100 μm. Scaffolds were treated with 4N NaOH for 16 hours to increase surface hydrophilicity, rinsed in DI H2O, and dried. Scaffolds were subsequently heat set for 10 min at 57°C in DI H2O. Dried scaffolds were then punched using a trephine to obtain uniform 5 mm disks. For scanning electron microscopy, disks were mounted, sputter-coated with gold, and imaged with a scanning electron microscope (FEI XL30 SEM-FEG, Eindhoven, Netherlands). For tissue engineering experiments, disks were ethylene-oxide sterilized in 24 well ultra-low attachment plates (Corning, Corning, NY) prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microparticle Characterization via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microparticles were extracted from droplets and resuspended in water. An aliquot of sample (5 µL) was drop-cast onto a silicon wafer attached to an aluminum stub with double-sided adhesive carbon tape and allowed to air dry for at least 4 hours. The dried samples were sputter-coated with gold for 250 s (Denton Desk IV, Moorestown, NJ) and then imaged with an FEI XL30 SEM-FEG at 7 kV. Mesoparticles were crosslinked in bulk and diluted 1:100 in water prior to sample preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Mouse Ear

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ear pinnae were dissected from mice 15 min after PSA and fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4˚C. Then ear tissues were dehydrated with an ethanol series and finally dried in hexamethyldisilane (HMDS) (Sigma, 440191). Ear samples were coated with gold for 600s employing the SPUT6 Vacuum Sputter Coater (Kurt Lesker PVD 75) before being imaged with a scanning electron microscope (FEI XL30 SEM-FEG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Raman and SEM Analysis of Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectroscopy was performed with a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam ARAMIS system operating with a 633 nm HeNe laser. The details of the calculation of the ratio of the D and G band intensities and of the nanocrystalline domain size are described elsewhere [23 ]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a FEI XL30 SEM-FEG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanomechanical Analysis of Collagen Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging (XE-100; Park Systems, Seoul, South Korea and Nanowizard II; JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) was performed in contact mode using NP-S10 probes (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) with a spring constant of 0.3 N m−1 at a scanning rate of 1.0 Hz or above. All AFM images were acquired directly from the histologic sections without any further processing or rehydration. Four sections were taken from each volunteer biopsy and a series of AFM images captured at four locations in the reticular dermis with scan sizes of 5×5, 10×10 and 40×40 μm2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; XL-30 FEG SEM; FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) was performed on sections coated with Au/Pd, using an acceleration voltage of 5 kV. Nanomechanical analysis was performed using a Nanowizard II AFM (JPK Instruments) system mounted on an Olympus IX71 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) inverted microscope. All AFM mechanical measurements were acquired directly on the histologic sections without any further processing or rehydration. All force–distance curves were acquired using RFESPA probes (Bruker) with a spring constant k=3 N m−1 used to indent radially individual collagen fibrils. All forces curves were then analyzed using a custom Matlab® algorithm, following the Oliver–Pharr modeling method to calculate the Young’s modulus (E) for fibrils.30
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Biofilm Structural Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms were grown on 0.6% agar plates for 2 days as described above. The region of the agar containing a biofilm (~ 2 cm × 2 cm) was separated from the remainder of the agar plate, transferred to a piece of glass, and placed horizontally in a 50 mL conical tube and frozen at −80°C overnight followed by overnight lyophilization (Millrock Technology, BT85A-A). The biofilm samples were sliced with a razor blade to expose blisters, sputter-coated with a 5 nm layer of Pd (VCR IBS/TM200S ion beam sputterer), adhered to an upright SEM stub with conductive tape, and imaged with a scanning electron microscope (FEI XL30 FEG-SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Androconial Scale Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed morphology of androconial scales was determined using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope. Three males and two females of H. melpomene from Ecuador were used for this analysis. The overlap grey scale region was dissected out from both hind and forewings and attached to aluminium stubs with carbon tabs and subsequently coated with 20 nm of gold using a Quorum/Emitech sputter coater. The gold-coated regions were then viewed in an FEI XL30 FEGSEM operated at 5 kV. Images were recorded digitally using XL30 software at 500× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!