The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using qpcrmix hs sybr kit

1

Quantitative mtDNA Copy Number Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of mtDNA copy number was estimated by quantitative PCR of the mtDNA fragment using the Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-Time System and 1× qPCR mix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Russia). The mtDNA primer sequences were as follows:
F: 5′-ACGAGGGTCCAACTGTCTCTTA-3′;
R: 5′-AGCTCCATAGGGTCTTCTCGT-3′.
The Gapdh and 18s rRNA genes of nuclear DNA were used as a reference. The primer sequences were as follows:
Gapdh—F: 5′-GGCTCCCTAGGCCCCTCCTG-3′;
R: 5′-TCCCAACTCGGCCCCCAACA-3′;
18s—F: 5′-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA-3′;
R: 5′-GCTGGAATTACTGTGGCT-3′.
qPCR cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles: denaturation 95 °C for 10 s, primer annealing at 59 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s.
Normalized mtDNA level relative to nuclear DNA was calculated using standard Equation (3): mtDNA level=2(ΔΔCq)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Gut Microbiome Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria in the mice feces were analyzed according to Yang et al. (2015) by quantitative PCR of the mtDNA fragment using a Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-Time System and 1× qPCR mix-HS SYBR Kit (Evrogen, Russia). The content of bacteria of a particular phylum was determined using the Equation (5).
% bacteria=EUnivCqUnivESpecCqSpec × 100%
where EUniv is PCR efficiency with the universal primers; ESpec is PCR efficiency with the phylum-specific primers; CqUniv is the number of quantitation cycle with the universal primers; and CqSpec is the number of quantitation cycle with the phylum-specific primers
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of M. smegmatis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from the 10 mL culture were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 3000× g and 4 °C, washed twice with 3 mL of RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, United States) for RNA stabilization. The cells of M. smegmatis were homogenized in ExtractRNA reagent (Evrogen, Moskow, Russia), followed by phenol (pH = 4.5)-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) purification and precipitation with isopropanol (2:1, v/v). The remaining genomic DNA was removed by DNAse I, Amplification grade (Invitrogen, USA). A volume of 50 ng of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis by iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, CA, USA). A sample of 1 ng of cDNA was used for real-time qPCR with the qPCRmix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Russia) on a CFX96 Touch machine (Bio-Rad, USA). The CFX Manager V 3.1 (Bio-Rad, USA) was used to analyse the qPCR results: relative normalized expression of three biological replicates was calculated as ΔΔCq [25 ] and the genes sigA and polA were used as a reference. The primers were picked by primer-BLAST [26 (link)] for qPCR (Appendix A, Table A1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying mRNA in MDCK-II cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify cellular mRNA in MDCK-II cells using qPCRmix-HS SYBR Kit (Evrogen, Russia), 4 μl of each cDNA preparation (1–100 ng of the above reaction), 0.4 μM of each (forward and reverse) primers, and 1× qPCRmix-HS SYBR (Evrogen, Russia) were mixed in a LightCycler 480 Multiwell Plate 96 (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) on ice in the dark and covered by LightCycler 480 Sealing Foil. Thermal cycling was done under the conditions as described above (Section Plasmids and primers). The quantification and data analysis was performed using the LightCycler 480 Service Software (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) and identified the binase action on cellular mRNA accumulation according to the relative fold-difference of expression levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

FFPE RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Fusion Transcript Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections using the RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA isolation from samples stored in RNAlater was carried out using the QIAGEN Rneasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. To confirm the presence of the fusion transcripts, we performed reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with oligonucleotide primers designed to specifically anneal to either side of the putative RTK fusion transcript breakpoint (Supplementary Table S3). First strand cDNA was synthesized from 0.5 to 1 µg total RNA using the MMLV RT kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia); cDNA was then amplified using the qPCRmix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), and real-time RT-PCR was carried out using CFX96 Touch™ real-time PCR equipment (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) in a 25 μL final volume containing 1× qPCRmix-HS SYBR, 25 pmol of primer pair (Table 1), and 1 μL of cDNA per reaction. PCR products were then assessed using melting curve analysis and by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. For the PCR products obtained, Sanger sequencing was carried out by Evrogen (Moscow, Russia) in both directions using the same primers as for RT-PCR amplification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Bacterial 16S rRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the quantitative analysis of bacterial DNA, Real-Time PCR was performed. Universal primers to the prokaryotic 16s rRNA gene were EUB338 – ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG/EUB518 – ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG [40 ]. A range of ten-fold dilutions of 16S rRNA E.coli was used as a standard. PCR was performed in three technical replicates using the qPCR mix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Russia) mixture, in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidance on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (BIO-RAD, USA) device using the protocol: 95 °C - 3′; 95 °C - 20″, 50 °C - 20″, 72 °C - 20" (40 cycles); final melt curve generation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Gene Expression by RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression level was determined by reverse transcription and real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from renal tissue samples with ExtractRNA reagent (Evrogen, Russia). RNA quality was estimated electrophoretically in 2% agarose gel. RNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop 1000 c spectrophotometer (USA). Two micrograms of total RNA was used per reverse transcription reaction with MMLV reverse transcriptase and standard dT15 oligonucleotide (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). The synthesized cDNA was used for real-time PCR with 200 nm gene-specific primers (Table 1). Real-time PCR was carried out using DNA amplifier DTlite (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia) with qPCRmix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). The PCR cycling mode was as follows: (1) «hot-start»: 95 °C, 5 min; (2) denaturation, 95 °C, 15 s; (3) primer annealing and DNA synthesis at 60 °C, 30 s. Stages (2) and (3) were repeated 40 times. The threshold cycle (Ct) value was determined using DTmaster software (DNA-technology, Moscow, Russia). The signal was normalized to that obtained for the gene of β-Actin (Actb). ∆Ct value was calculated by the formula ∆Ct = Ct (gene of interest) – Ct (Actb); ∆∆Ct was calculated ∆Ct (control) − ∆Ct (experiment). The 2^-∆∆Ct method was used to calculate differences in genes expression [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of pmoA Genes in Soil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of pmoA genes was performed according to a previously described method [40 (link)] on a the StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using qPCRmix-HS SYBR Kit (Evrogen, Russia). Concentration of pmoA genes was estimated using the primer system highly specific to the pmoA sequences retrieved from the examined soil samples at the previous stage. A primer system was designed using Primrose software [41 (link)]: pmoA-Cl-F (5′-GCA ATA TGG CAC GCT GAT GT-3′) and pmoA-Cl-R (5′-ATG TAT TCG GGC ATC GAG GTA-3′). qPCR thermal program was adjusted experimentally according to the standard protocol: 94 °C—20”; 62 °C—20”; 72 °C—15”; primers conc.—0.5 μM; Mg++ conc.—3 mM. One of the pmoA amplicons inserted in the pGEM®-T vector was used to generate a standard curve. Standards, samples and negative controls were run in triplicate. The correlation coefficient for standard curve was 0.997.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Plant Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using TRI-Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the instructions supplied with the reagent. For the synthesis of the first cDNA strand, a reverse transcription kit (Sintol, Moscow, Russia) was used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using iCycler IQ5 (Bio-Rad, Alfred Nobel Drive, Hercules, CA, USA) and the reaction mixture from the qPCRmix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). The UBQ5 gene (AT3G62250) was used as an internal reference [43 (link)]. The RPL2 gene (ATCG00830) was used as a control for the psbD gene. Primer sequences are presented in Table A1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Validating RNA-Seq Gene Expression by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to validate the changes in gene expression determined by RNA-seq, we selected 5 genes of TFs for qPCR analysis. Poly(A) RNA was extracted as described above, but from other individuals than used for sequencing. RNA was isolated independently three times (5 individuals per repeat) for each of the three stages of regeneration. Sequences of PCR primers are shown in the Supplementary Table S6. RNA was reverse transcribed with poly-dT primers as described in the protocol of MMLV RT kit (Evrogen, Russia). PCR reaction was performed using a qPCRmix-HS SYBR kit (Evrogen, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for CFX96 Touch system (Bio-Rad, USA). The reactions were performed on three independent RNA samples per condition. Each sample was analyzed at least twice, making sure that the difference between technical replicates was lower than 0.5 Ct. The first regeneration stage was used as a control sample. All the expression values were normalized relative to the Ct geometric mean of Tubulin and EF1a genes. The delta-delta Ct method was used to evaluate expression. Primer efficacy was evaluated using ten serial dilutions (1:2) of cDNA combined from all samples in CFX Manager v3.1 software (Bio-Rad, USA). Specificity of the primers was determined by Sanger sequencing of target amplicon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!