The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using masterpure kit

1

HPV Testing Methodology for HeNCe Life Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPV testing methodology for the HeNCe Life Study has been previously described [7 (link),16 ]. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min at 22 °C. Pellets were resuspended in 300 μL of 20 mmol/L Tris buffer (pH 8.3) and DNA was purified using the MasterPure™ Kit (Epicenter). Extracted DNA was kept frozen until tested with PCR at −70 °C. We used several molecular techniques for testing and genotyping HPV genera. All HPV DNA samples were tested for β-globin, with positive samples considered for further HPV genotyping and negative samples considered inadequate for PCR. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with PGMY09-PGMY11-primers and linear array was used to test for α-HPV genotypes. This is capable of detecting 36 mucosal genotypes. To detect cutaneous genotypes, β- and γ-HPV, we used multiplex PCR with bead-based Luminex technology. This technique is capable of detecting 43 β-HPV genotypes and 52 γ-HPV genotypes [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Purification of Pollen Nuclei for Genomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pollen nuclei of wild-type (Col-0) and mutant dme/+, ros1, and dme/+;ros1 plants were purified by FACS using SYBR Green staining as previously described49 (link),50 (link). Briefly, open flowers were collected into a 50 mL falcon tubes and vortexed in 10 mL of Galbraith buffer (45 mM MgCl2, 30 mM Sodium Citrate, 20 mM MOPS, 1% Triton-100 pH 7.0) for 3 min, at room temperature. This crude fraction was then filtered through Miracloth (Calbiochem) and centrifuged for 1 min at 2600 × g to concentrate the pollen fraction. The pollen was then transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube containing ~100 μL of acid-washed glass beads (425–600 μm, Sigma) and vortexed continuously at maximum speed for 3 min, to break the pollen cell wall. The fraction containing the released nuclei was then filtered through a 10 μm mesh (Celltrics, Sysmex-Partec) to exclude pollen debris and stained with SYBR Green dye (Lonza). FACS was performed using a FACSAria IIU cell sorter (BD Biosciences), using the integrated FACSDiva v6.1 software with 70 µ nozzle at 70 psi. A 488 nm laser was used for SYBR Green excitation, which was detected by a 530/30 nm band-pass filter (Supplementary Fig. 2). Approximately 500,000 nuclei from each genotype and cell type were purified, and genomic DNA was extracted using the Masterpure kit (Epicenter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic DNA Extraction from Microbial Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using a MasterPure kit (Epicentre, USA) from the concentrated bead samples. After defrosting, cells attached to sampled beads were lysed using a buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCL and 1 mM EDTA and 5 μl of 50 mg ml−1 lysozyme and incubating for 30 min at 37°C, after which the extraction protocol was followed. DNA was precipitated by incubation of the samples with glycogen for 30 min at −20°C prior to centrifugation and washing. DNA from 1/32 of the SPM filters was extracted using the Powersoil® DNA Isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (MoBio, Qiagen, Carlsbad, CA), except with an elution step with 50 μl TE. DNA concentrations were measured fluorometrically with Qubit™ dsDNA HS assay kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA), and extracts were stored at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic Analysis of L. monocytogenes Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L. monocytogenes genomic DNA was extracted (MasterPure Kit, Epicentre) and sequenced by Illumina 50SR (library preparation and sequencing performed by UC Berkeley QB3 Genomic Sequencing Laboratory). Sequencing data were aligned to the 10403S reference genome and SNP/InDel/structural variation was determined (CLC Genomics Workbench, CLC bio) for the ΔgshF parent strain and the two hyper-haemolytic suppressor mutants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA Extraction from Native and Decellularized Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty 10 μm sections of native and decellularised muscle were collected in 1.5 ml microtubes in 300 μl of PBS. DNA was extracted using the Masterpure kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the muscle was incubated in 600 μl of lysis solution containing 0.1 mg proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) at 65°C for 45 min before being cooled to 37°C and incubated with 10 ng RNase A (Epicentre) for 30 min. Samples were kept on ice for 5 min, 300 μl of MPC protein precipitation reagent was added and the mixture centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and DNA precipitated by adding 1 ml of isopropanol and centrifuging at 10,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was rinsed in 70% ethanol, dried and resuspended in 35 μl of TE (10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA) buffer. DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of HBV DNA and cccDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA and DNA were extracted using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin RNA kit and the Epicentre MasterPure kit, respectively. Real-time PCRs were performed as previously described (43 (link)). The 3.5-kb RNA was normalized to the housekeeping gene beta-glucuronidase (GUSB) (Hs99999908_m1; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total HBV DNA was measured using TaqMan assay Pa03453406_s1 (Life Technologies). For cccDNA quantification, incomplete double-stranded circular DNA was degraded by ExoI+III treatment, and primers targeting a specific region in cccDNA were used (44 (link)) (forward, 5′CCGTGTGCACTTCGCTTCA3′; reverse, 5′GCACAGCTTGGAGGCTTGA3′; probe, 5′[6FAM]CATGGAGACCACCGTGAACGCCC[BBQ]). Serial dilutions of an HBV plasmid served as an external quantification standard. Total DNA or cccDNA was normalized to human beta globin (HBB) (Hs00758889_s1; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction from FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded samples using a MasterPure kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, each FFPE tissue was resuspended in MasterPure Tissue and Cell Lysis solution (final concentration, 0.15 mg mL−1 proteinase K) and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. The MasterPure MPC™ protein precipitation reagent was then added, and nucleic acids were precipitated with isopropanol and pelleted by centrifugation at 10 000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully removed. The pellet was washed twice with 75% ethanol, allowed to dry, and then treated with 30 μL TE buffer containing 40 units of RNase inhibitor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

BDNF Genotyping from Mouthwash Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parents’ DNA was extracted from 20 ml of mouthwash samples using the Master Pure kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA). Twins’ DNA (used as a control variable) was isolated from buccal epithelial cells using buccal swab brushes that were kept after collection in a sterile tube containing 15 ml of “Aquafresh” mouthwash. Genotyping was done as described by Shalev et al. (2009). The BDNF SNP was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Allele frequencies of the BDNF genotypes were as follows: Met/Met 3.3%–4.8%, Met/Val 31.8%–34.4%, Val/Val 62.3%–63.4% for children, mothers, and fathers. Met carriers were examined versus the Val/Val carriers. The Met carriers were grouped and coded as 0, while the Val/Val carriers were coded as 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Splicing Efficiency using qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were grown in YPD+G418 at 30°C until cells reached the logarithmic growth phase at an optical density of approximately 0.4. Then, RNA was extracted using MasterPure kit (Epicentre) and were reverse transcribed to cDNA using random primers. A total of 2 μL of cDNA was added to each reaction as template for qPCR using light cycler 480 SYBR I master kit and the LightCycler 480 system (Roche Applied Science), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each strain, qPCRs were performed with two to three biological repetitions and three technical repeats. A first qPCR was performed targeting the transcript-spliced version, with a forward primer complementing the exon-exon junction and a downstream reverse primer. A second PCR targeted the un-spliced version of the transcript, with a forward primer complementing the intron and the same reverse primer of the first reaction: Fexon-exon = 5′-CACTACTTTAGGTTATGGTTT-3′; Fintron = 5′-CTTCAATTTACTGAATTTGTATG-3′; Rboth = 5′-GTCTTGTAGTTACCGTCA-3′.
Splicing efficiency is reported as the average Cp of the spliced transcript minus the average Cp of the un-spliced version.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PCR for Viral Genome Copy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA purification and RNase A treatment of cells grown in 24-well plates at 24, 36, and 44 or 48 hpi were performed using the MasterPure kit (Epicentre) per the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed to calculate sample genome copy number using a standard curve of serial dilutions of a plasmid containing the ompA gene of known concentration, as we described previously (52 (link), 53 (link), 114 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!