The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using polarisq mass spectrometer

1

Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fasting serum nonesterified fatty acids were transformed to fatty acid methyl esters, as described in our previous studies [7 (link), 23 (link)]. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis was performed using a TRACE gas chromatograph with a Polaris Q mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). Separation was obtained on a J&W DB-WAX capillary column (30-m, 0.25-mm I.D., 0.25-μm film thickness; Agilent J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). Heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) was used as an internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soxhlet Cleanup of CNPW Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clean-up of CNPW CNPW was first cleaned with 100 mL of toluene in a Soxhlet apparatus (FALC Instrument, Milan, Italy) for 92 h. Toluene aliquots (100 mL) were recovered at t=24, 48, 52 and 92 h. We added 20 mL of isooctane to each sample, which was then reduced to 1 mL and analysed on a Trace GC Ultra gas chromatograph equipped with a Polaris Q mass spectrometer (Thermo-Finnigan, Austin, Texas, USA) in SIM (selected-ion monitoring) mode. We obtained different elimination curves for every measured PAH until 92 h of clean-up.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Cellular Fatty Acid Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h of incubation with different PUFAs or their diluent, cells were washed by centrifugation using PBS containing 1 mg/ml BSA, and cellular lipids were extracted into chloroform containing 3.2 μg of the internal standard 1,2-diheptadecanoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphorylcholine (Biolynx) using the Bligh and Dyer method (26 (link)). The extracted lipids were saponified with 0.5 M KOH in methanol (100°C for 15 min), and FAMEs were prepared by adding 14% BF3 in methanol (100°C for 15 min) and quantified by GC with flame ionization detection (FID) as previously described (9 (link), 27 (link)). FAME standards (Nu-Check Prep) were used to identify peak retention times, and standard curves were used for FAME quantification. For the deuterated FA experiments, pentafluorobenzyl esters of FAs were prepared and measured by negative ion chemical ionization GC/MS using a Polaris Q mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation) as previously described (9 (link), 27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Volatile Organic Compounds Identification in Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The separation and identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), from the analyzed oil samples, were performed by using a Trace GC Ultra Gas Chromatograph from Thermo Scientific (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Bremen, Germany) coupled with Thermo Electron Polaris Q Mass Spectrometer, equipped with an electron ionization source operating at 70 eV. For the chromatographic separation of the target compounds, a DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness) capillary column (5% diphenyl, 95% dimethylpolysiloxane) was used. The injection volume of each diluted oil sample was 2 μL. The oven temperature program was 40 °C for 3 min, which was then increased from 40 to 300 °C with 10 °C min−1, and kept at 300 °C for 10 min. The injector and transfer line were 250 °C and 300 °C, respectively. The carrier gas was helium with a flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1. The constituents of the samples were identified and confirmed based on two different approaches: linear retention indices (LRIs) determined relative to a series of n-alkanes (C8–C20) and by comparison of the mass spectra with those available in the commercial libraries (NIST 2011) [59 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed Livestock Feed Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry matter content was determined according to the National Forage Testing Association method 2.1.4 [19 ]. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was determined as described by Van Soest et al. [20 (link)] using heat-stable α-amylase (FAA, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY) and sodium sulfite. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin concentrations were determined according to AOAC method 973.18 [21 ]. Ash content was determined according to AOAC method 942.05 [21 ]. Hemicellulose was calculated as the difference between NDF and ADF. Cellulose was calculated by subtracting ash and lignin from ADF.
For measurement of ruminal VFA concentrations, rumen fluid samples were thawed and composited by day, animal, and period (n = 6). The samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 2500×g at room temperature to remove solid particles, and supernatant liquid was collected. An external tracer consisting of a mix of 13C-labelled acetate, propionate, and butyrate was added to each liquid sample, then rumen liquid samples were derivatized, and the derivatives were analyzed for isotopic ratio using a Thermo Electron Polaris Q mass spectrometer in tandem with a Thermo Electron Focus gas chromatography (GC-MS; Thermo Electron Corporation, Austin, TX) as described by Kristensen [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Forage Composition and Rumen VFA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry matter content was determined according to the National Forage Testing Association method 2.1.4 [19] . Neutral detergent ber (NDF) was determined as described by Van Soest et al. [20] using heatstable α-amylase (FAA, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY) and sodium sul te. Acid detergent ber (ADF) and lignin concentrations were determined according to AOAC method 973.18 [21] . Ash content was determined according to AOAC method 942.05 [21] . Hemicellulose was calculated as the difference between NDF and ADF. Cellulose was calculated by subtracting ash and lignin from ADF.
For measurement of ruminal VFA concentrations, rumen uid samples were thawed and composited by day, animal, and period. The samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 2,500 × g at room temperature to remove solid particles, and supernatant liquid was collected. An external tracer consisting of a mix of 13 Clabelled acetate, propionate, and butyrate was added to each liquid sample, then rumen liquid samples were derivatized, and the derivatives were analyzed for isotopic ratio using a Thermo Electron Polaris Q mass spectrometer in tandem with a Thermo Electron Focus gas chromatography (GC-MS; Thermo Electron Corporation, Austin, TX) as described by Kristensen [22] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SCFA Quantification in Feces and Chyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SCFA analyzed were acetic (C2), propionic (C3), isobutyric (iC4), butyric (C4), isovaleric (iC5), valeric (C5) and hexanoic acids (C6). The SCFA content of the feces and chyme from the caecum was measured by SPME-GC-MS following a protocol previously described [31 (link)]. Between 20 and 25 mg of samples were introduced into a 20 mL glass vial. Forty µL of internal standard (2-methylvaleric acid) at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL, 15 µL of 0.9 M sulfuric acid, and 920 µL of water were then added. The mixture was vortexed and placed on the autosampler of the SPME-GC-MS system until analysis. SCFA were extracted with a SPME fiber, separated on a Focus GC gas chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a Supelcowax-10 column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.2 µm) (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and analyzed with an ion trap PolarisQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The agitation temperature was set at 60 °C and the extraction time at 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Arachidonic Acid Release

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of arachidonic acid release from cellular membranes was performed as previously described [31 (link), 32 (link)]. Briefly, freshly isolated PMNL (107 cells/ml, in HBSS containing 1.6 mM CaCl2 and 0.1% BSA) were incubated with adenosine deaminase (0.3 U/ml) and test compounds for 5 min at 37°C. Stimulation was initiated with the addition of 1 μM thapsigargin, followed by incubation at 37°C for 5 min. The reactions were stopped with the addition of two volumes of cold MeOH and 300 ng of arachidonic acid-d8 (Cayman Chemicals) as internal standard. The samples were stored at −20°C overnight and then centrifuged the next day at 1000 g for 10 min. The supernatants were diluted with four volumes of acidified water (0.1%) then processed on an octadecyl (C18) column. Samples were eluted with the addition of 3 ml of MeOH and dried under nitrogen. Pentafluorobenzylesters were prepared with the addition 50 μl N,N-diisopropylethylamine (20% in acetonitrile) and 50 μl of 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzylesters (20% in acetonitrile). Samples were heated for 40 min at 40°C, then dried under nitrogen and resuspended in 100 μl of hexane. Samples were quantified by negative ion chemical ionization gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using TraceGC ultra column (Thermo) and a Polaris Q mass spectrometer (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-MS Analysis of Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FFAs analysis in the obtained samples was performed at Focus GC coupled with a PolarisQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The carrier gas was helium (1 mL/min) and the injected volume of the sample was 1 µL. The temperature program of the oven was as follows: the initial temperature 50 °C (1 min), then 25 °C/min to 200 °C and, immediately afterwards, 3 °C/min to 230 °C (held for 18 min). The injector was in split mode (50:1), while the temperatures of the injector, transfer line and ion source were 250 °C, 260 °C and 260 °C, respectively. The concentration of 18 fatty acids was investigate: FFAs abbreviations: C14:0—myristic; C15:0—pentadecylic; C16:0—palmitic; C16:1—palmitoleic; C17:0—margaric; C17:1—heptadecenoic; C18:0—stearic; C18:1c—oleic; C18:1t—elidic; C18:2c+t—linoleic/linolelaidic; C18:3n3c+t—linolenic; C20—arachidic; C20:1—gondoic; C20:2—eicosadienoic; C20:3n3—dihomo-α-linolenic; C20:3n4—dihomo-γ-linolenic; C20:3n6—eicosahexaenoic; C22:6—docosahexaenoic. Under applied chromatographic conditions cis- and trans- forms of C18:2 and C18:3n3 coelute at the same retention time, so their concentrations were calculated as the sum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was performed on a GC–MS TRACE GC coupled to a Polaris Q mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the protocol of Plassmeier et al. (2007) (link). The instrument was equipped with a Rtx®-5MS column (30 m, iD 0.25, df 0.25 µm; Restek). A 1-µl sample was injected in splitless mode into the GC-MS column. The oven program consisted of 3 min at 80 °C, a ramp with 5 °C min–1 up to 325 °C, and finally 325 °C for 2 min. The MS transfer line temperature to the quadruple was set to 250 °C and the electron impact (EI) ion source temperature was 220 °C. The spectra were recorded with a scanning range of 50–650 mz–1 (Supplementary Table S1). Replicate samples were derivatized and measured separately with intervals of at least 3 d. A blank was run every four samples to check for carry-over of metabolites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!