The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using agilent jet stream esi source

1

Quantifying Uremic Toxins via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify levels of uremic toxins and related metabolites, targeted profiling was performed on Agilent 1290 Infinity LC and Agilent 6490 Triple Quadrupole MS systems equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). MassHunter Workstation (Ver B.06.00, Agilent Technologies) software was used for data acquisition and analysis. Chromatographic separation was performed using a ZIC®-HILIC column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 3.5 μm; SeQuant). The flow rate and injection volume were set at 0.4 ml/min and 1 μl, respectively. Mobile phase A consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid in water:acetonitrile (5:95 v/v), and phase B consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid in water:acetonitrile (50:50 v/v). The linear gradient used for elution and to equilibrate the initial gradient for subsequent runs was 1% B from 0–2 min, 1–55% B from 2–6 min, 55–99% B from 6–7 min, 99% B from 7–9 min, 99–1% B from 9–9.1 min, and 99% B from 9.1–13 min. Quantification was performed in the MRM mode and the optimal conditions for each metabolite were determined by flow injection of individual standards (100 ng/mL in 75% acetonitrile) into the ESI source in the negative ion mode. p-Cresyl sulfate-2H7 was used as an internal standard. Compound retention times and MRM transitions are summarized in Supplementary Table S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Metabolite Quantification by TQ-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Modern TQ-MS provides the ability to detect and quantify a large number of metabolites. The present quantification of targeted metabolites was performed on Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC and Agilent 6495 Triple Quadrupole MS systems equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). MassHunter Workstation (Ver B.06.00, Agilent Technologies) software was used for data acquisition and analysis. Chromatographic separation was performed using a Scherzo SM-C18 column (2 mm × 100 mm, 3 μm; Imtakt, Kyoto, Japan). The flow rate and injection volume were set at 0.35 mL/min and 1 μL, respectively. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water, and phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in methanol. The linear gradient used for elution and equilibration of the initial gradient for subsequent runs was as follows: 5% B from 0–3 min, 5–90% B from 3–10 min, 90% B from 10–12 min, 5–95% B from 12–13 min, 5% B from 13–15 min. Quantification was performed in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, and the optimal conditions for each metabolite were determined by flow injection of individual standards (100 ng/mL in 20% methanol) into the ESI source in the positive and negative ion modes. 13C6-Phenylalanine was used as an internal standard. The compound retention times and MRM transitions are summarized in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Toxin Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS detection was performed using an Agilent G6460C Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and an IT-TOF-MS system with an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The nitrogen generator is a Nitrocraft NCLC/MC from Air Liquid (Spain).
Agilent source conditions were optimized to achieve the best sensitivity for all compounds: drying gas temperature of 250 °C and flow of 5 L/min, nebulizer gas pressure of 55 psi (Nitrocraft NCLC/MS from Air Liquid), sheath gas temperature of 400 °C and flow of 12 L/min. The capillary voltage was set to 3000 V in positive mode with a nozzle voltage of 0 V. The fragmentor was 152 and the cell accelerator voltage was 2 for each toxin in this method.
IT-TOF-MS source conditions were nebulizing gas flow, 1.5 L/min, heat block temperature and CDL temperature, 200 °C and detector voltage, 1.65 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PFAS Quantification by IMS-qTOF LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample analyses were carried out on an Agilent 6560 IMS-qTOF coupled with an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA) using a previously described method.29 (link) Chromatographic separation of samples (2 μL injections) was performed using a C18 Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) with the gradient summarized in Table S4 with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Mobile phase A was comprised of 5 mM ammonium acetate in water, and mobile phase B was comprised of 5 mM ammonium acetate in 95:5 methanol/water. An Agilent Jet Stream ESI source (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA) was operated in negative ionization mode with the source conditions summarized in Table S5. IMS-MS settings are summarized in Table S6. Agilent ESI tune mix solution (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA) was directly injected to calibrate the instrument and calculate collision cross-section (CCS) values for the PFAS analytes using a previously described and validated single-field calibration method.29 (link) Briefly, tune mix ions with known CCS values served as calibrants for relating measured analyte drift times to CCS values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Tetrodontoxin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography separation was carried out using a 1290 Infinity ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography system coupled to an Agilent G6460C Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream ESI source (Agilent Tecnologies, Waldbronn, Germany). TTX identification and quantification was performed according to Rodriguez et al. [43 (link)]. Briefly, toxin was separated using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters, Manchester, UK) at 35 °C, with an injection volume of 5 µL. The composition of the mobile phase A was 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid and 2% 100 mM ammonium formate dissolved in water. Chromatographic separation was performed by gradient elution: starting with 95% B and reducing to 5% B over 11 min, then 5% B was held for 1 min, and increasing to 95% B over 1 min. Finally, 95% was held for 2 min until the next run (run time 15 min). The mass spectrometer was operated in positive mode, and analyses were performed in Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode monitoring two transitions: m/z 320.0 > 161.9 (identification) and m/z 320.0 > 302.0 (quantification).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Carnitine Analysis by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To perform quantitative analysis, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry analyses of aqueous extracts, including carnitine, acetyl-carnitine, and ocatonyl-carnitine, were performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC and an Agilent 6495 Triple Quadrupole MS system equipped with an Agilent jet stream ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Separations and the binary gradient system were identical to the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS analysis of the aqueous extracts. The column effluent was introduced into a triple quadrupole mass detector operating in a positive or negative ESI mode. Samples were analysed via the simple reaction monitoring mode for transition of the parent ion to the product ion. Characteristics of multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), calibration curve, and accuracy are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!