The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using q exactivetm hybrid quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer

1

High-Resolution Peptide Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were fractionated using high pH reverse phase HPLC, separated on a reverse phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and analyzed using a Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were subjected to a nanoSpray ionization source, followed by MS/MS using a Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled in line with the HPLC. Intact peptides were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 70, 000 and selected for MS/MS using normalized collision energy setting as 32. Ion fragments were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 17,500. A data-dependent procedure that alternates between one MS scan followed by 20 MS/MS scans was applied to the top 20 precursor ions above a threshold ion count of 2E4 in the MS survey scan, with dynamic exclusion set at 30 s. The electrospray voltage was 2.0 kV. Automatic gain control was used to prevent overfilling of the ion trap. 5E4 ions were accumulated to generate MS/MS spectra. For the MS scans, the m/z scan ranged from 350 to 1800. Fixed first mass was set as 100 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS Metabolomic Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analysis was conducted according to our previous method [16 (link)]. Briefly, metabolomic analyses were performed with a Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer coupled with an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). An ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, particle size 1.8 μm, Waters, USA) at 40 °C was used with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min for chromatographic separation. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (phase A) and acetonitrile (phase B), and the gradient conditions were set as follows: 0–1 min, 2% phase B; 1–10 min, 2–100% phase B; 10–13 min, 100% phase B; 13–13.1 min, 100–2% phase B; 13.1–16 min, 2% phase B. The capillary voltages used for the positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) and negative electrospray ionization (ESI-) modes were 3500 v and 2500 v, respectively. The ion transfer tube temperature was set to 350 °C. The mass scan range (m/z) was set to 70–1000 with a mass resolution of 70,000 in both ESI+ and ESI− modes. The sheath gas was set to 35 and 40 Arb in ESI+ and ESI− modes, respectively. For collecting MS/MS spectra, data-dependent acquisition was performed in a top 10 mode with a mass resolution of 17,500 and stepped collision energies of 10, 20, and 40 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Bioactive Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the method used by Abd Ghafar et al. [50 (link)], the UHPLC-MS/MS analysis slight adjustment was done. The UHPLC-MS/MS spectrum of the active extract was acquired using a Thermo ScientificTM Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source coupled with an auto-sampler and surveyor UHPLC binary pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Phytochemical separation was done using an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm). The mobile phase used in the separation was LC-MS-grade water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B), each consisting of 0.1% FA. The programmed gradient was initiated with 5% to 100% solvent B from 0.5 to 30 min, and the solvent system was delivered at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The sample was prepared in 10 mg/mL with an injection volume of 2 µL. Negative ion mode was done in full scan mass spectra acquisition from 150–1500 m/z with collision-induced dissociation (CID) energy of 30%. The mass spectra were collected and processed using Thermo Xcalibur Qual Browser software 4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bile Acid Profiling in Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, BAs in 100 mg of fecal samples were extracted using 1 mL of methanol. BAs in the optioned supernatant after 30 min of centrifugation at 12,000 rpm were analyzed. BAs were separated using a Dionex™ UltiMate™ 3000 Rapid Separation LC (RSLC) system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an HSS T3C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm, Waters, Milford, CT, USA). The injection volume, temperature, and flow rate were set to 50 °C, 10 μL, and 300 μL/min, respectively. Methanol (A) and 2 mmol/L of ammonium acetate (B) were used as the mobile phases. Furthermore, the mass spectrometry was performed using a Thermo Scientific TM Q Exactive TM hybrid quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with a HESI-II probe. The negative HESI-II spray voltage was 3.5 kV. The heated capillary temperature, sheath gas pressure, auxiliary gas setting, and heated vaporizer temperature were 320 °C, 30 psi, 10 psi, and 300 °C, respectively. The auxiliary gas, sheath gas, and collision gas were all nitrogen at 1.5 m Torr. The full mass scan parameters were set as follows: an auto gain control target under 1 × 106, a resolution of 70,000, an m/z range of 150–1500, and a maximum isolation time of 50 ms [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of Nectar Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteomic analysis was performed to identify proteins in nectars at the Iowa State University protein facility5. The nectar of different species was initially analyzed by SDS-PAGE according method described previously (Laemmli, 1970 (link)). Afterwards, the selected bands were excised and the pieces transferred to a 0.6 mL methanol, washed and then added 20 μl of 1% acetic acid. Next, the proteins were digested in solution with trypsin/Lys-C (Promega). The peptides were then separated by liquid chromatography and analyzed by MS/MS by fragmenting each peptide on Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer from Thermo Scientific. Raw data were analyzed using Thermo Scientific’s Proteome Discoverer Software and the data searched using publically available databases. Bovine serum albumin was used as an internal calibration standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Peptide Separation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The labeled peptides were dissolved in 0.1% FA (Formic acid) and directly loaded onto a reversed-phase pre-column (Acclaim PepMap 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptide separation was performed in a reversed-phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC, Thermo Scientific). The gradient was comprised of an increase from 6% to 22% of solvent B (0.1% FA in 98% acetonitrile) over 26 min, then 22% to 35% in 8 min and increasing to 80% in 3 min, then holding at 80% for the last 3 min, at a constant flow rate of 350 nl min−1 on an EASY-nLC 1000 UPLC system. The resulting peptides were analyzed on a Q ExactiveTM hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of Fermentation Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparative analysis of fermentation extracts of all strains containing pOE484 except K7N3, CPN4 and CPN5, relative to control mutant containing empty plasmid pIB139, was conducted at ETH Zurich on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system coupled to a Thermo ScientificTM Q ExactiveTM Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. MS-settings: spray voltage 3.5 kV; capillary temperature 320 °C; sheath gas (52.50), auxiliary gas (13.75), sweep gas (2.75); probe heater 437.50 °C; S-Lens RF (50), positive mode, resolution 70.000; AGC target 1e6, microscans 1, maximum IT 75 ms, scan range 200–1800 m/z. Chromatographic separation was obtained using a Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6 µm XB-C18 150 × 4.6 mm column with solvents (A, H2O + 0.1% formic acid) and (B, MeCN + 0.1% formic acid) and the following gradient: flow rate 0.7 mL min−1, 20% B for 2 min, 20–98% B over 18 min, 98% B for 5 min, 98–20% B in 0.5 min and 20% B for 4 min. Metabolic differences within the obtained data (Supplementary Table 8) were identified using SIEVE 2.0 screening software (Thermo Fischer Scientific), applying the default settings for component extraction of small molecules, except that of the base peak minimum intensity, which was set to 5000000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Separation and Identification by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were fractionated by high pH reverse-phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Briefly, peptides were dried by vacuum centrifugation. Then the Peptides were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid and directly loaded onto a reversed-phase precolumn (Acclaim PepMap 100, Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated using a reversed-phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC, Thermo Scientific) and analyzed by Q ExactiveTM hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The peptides were subjected to NSI source followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in Q ExactiveTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled online to the HPLC. Intact peptides were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 70,000. Peptides were selected for MS/MS using NCE setting as 32. Ion fragments were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 17,500. A data-dependent procedure that alternated between one MS scan followed by 20 MS/MS scans was applied for the top 20 precursor ions above a threshold ion count of 2E4 in the MS survey scan with 30.0 s dynamic exclusion. The electrospray voltage was 2.0 kV. Automatic gain control (AGC) was used to prevent overfilling of the ion trap. 5E4 ions were accumulated for generation of MS/MS spectra. For MS scans, the m/z scan range was 350 to 1800. Fixed first mass was set as 100 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mass Spectrometry for Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were dissolved in 0.1% FA (Fluka), and loaded directly onto a reversed-phase precolumn (Acclaim PepMap 100, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). A Q ExactiveTM hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the resulting peptides. The peptides with a treatment of NanoSpray Ionization (NSI) source was analyzed by MS/MS in Q ExactiveTM (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). At a resolution of 70,000, complete peptides were detected in Orbitrap. For MS/MS, peptides were picked up by a normalized collision energy (NCE) setting of 28. At a resolution of 17,500, Orbitrap was used to detect the ion fragments. For the top 20 precursor ions above the threshold ion count of 5E3, a data-dependent process was performed between 1 MS scan and subsequent 20 MS/MS scans alternately. The electrospray voltage applied was 2.0 kV. To prevent Orbitrap from overfilling, the automatic gain control (AGC) was used; 5E4 ions were cumulated for the formation of MS/MS spectrum. The m/z scanning ranged from 350 to 1800. The fixed first mass setting is 100 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Proteomics of Peptide Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were dissolved in 0.1% FA (Sigma-Aldrich), directly loaded onto a reversed-phase pre-column (Acclaim PepMap 100, Thermo Scientific). The resulting peptides were analyzed by Q ExactiveTM hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). LC-MS/MS analysis, database search and bioinformatics annotation were performed by PTM-Biolabs Co., Ltd (Hang Zhou, China). Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway analysis and visualization were performed using R (Version 3.5.0) with the package clusterProfiler (Version 3.8.1) 15 (link). Protein-protein interaction networks were predicted by STRING. Network visualization was performed by Cytoscape (Version 3.4.0). Genes were considered to be significantly differentially expressed between groups when the P-value was less than 0.05 and the fold change of expression was more than 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!