The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gradient sds page gel

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels are laboratory instruments used to separate and analyze proteins based on their molecular weight. These gels provide a consistent and reliable platform for protein electrophoresis, enabling researchers to accurately determine the size and purity of protein samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

48 protocols using gradient sds page gel

1

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were loaded and separated using 4-12 % gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen). The proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) following standard procedures at 100 V 1h. Membranes were blocked in 3% non-fat dry milk for at least 30 min at room temperature. The membranes then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies listed in Key resource Table. After washing with 1×PBS containing 0.1% Tween20, the membranes were incubated with secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to HRP conjugated secondary antibodies listed in Key resource Table. The membranes were developed using the Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat#32109) and the ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were loaded and separated using 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen). The proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) following standard procedures at 100 V 1h. Membranes were blocked in 3% non-fat dry milk for at least 30 min at room temperature. The membranes then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies listed in Key resources table. After washing with 1×PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, the membranes were incubated with secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to HRP conjugated secondary antibodies listed in Key resources table. The membranes were developed using the Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat#32109) and the ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chimerization and Fc-optimization of Anti-B7-H3 mAb

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Generation of 8H8_SDIE and 8H8_WT as well as corresponding controls was carried out by chimerization (human immunoglobulin G1/κ constant region) of the anti-B7-H3 mAb 8H8 and control mAb MOPC21, respectively and Fc-optimization (S239D/I332E modification) for mAbs as described previously (35 (link)). Briefly, respective light chain (LC) and heavy chain (HC) plasmids were received using the EndoFree Plasmid Maxi kit from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) as described in the manufacturer’s instructions. For antibody production, the ExpiCHO cell system (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. mAbs were purified from media by protein A affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) followed by preparative size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200; GE Healthcare). To ensure quality and purity of produced antibodies, analytical size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL; GE Healthcare) and 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) was performed using the gel filtration and Precision Plus standard from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eluted proteins were separated on 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and stained with Colloidal Coomassie Blue. Each gel lane was cut into 23 equal gel slices and proteins therein were in-gel digested with trypsin as described57 (link). Tryptic peptides from each gel slice were analysed as described58 (link) by nanoflow HPLC (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies) coupled to nanoelectrospray LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Raw MS data files were analysed by MaxQuant (version 1.3.0.5)22 (link) and Andromeda59 (link) using the UniProt rat protein database (version 05.13) and with selected “label-free protein quantification” (LFQ). Results from MaxQuant were further processed using Perseus (version 1.3.0.4, www.perseus-framework.org). Contaminant and reverse entries were filtered and all LFQ intensities were logarithmised. Missing values were imputed with random numbers using normal distribution (width = 0.3, down shift = 1.8) to simulate low abundance intensity values21 (link). A modified t test (250 permutations, FDR = 0.01, S0 = 2)60 (link)61 (link) was applied to identify proteins significantly enriched within each IP experiment using four biological replicates and compared to identical control IP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exosomal Protein Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes isolated from serum were suspended in 50 μl M-PER reagent (Thermo Scientific) with HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). After determining the protein concentration using Bradford analysis, the samples were fractionated on a 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Subsequently, the gels were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membrane was incubated with anti-CD63 (H5C6) (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO) or anti-CD9 (D3H4P) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse/-rabbit antibody. The proteins were visualized using an Immobilon Forte Western HRP blotting substrate (Millipore, Burlington, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Quantification and Deglycosylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A bullet blender (Next Advance) was used to homogenize cell lysates. Protein concentrations were normalized by DC™-protein assay (Bio-Rad), and equal amounts of protein were loaded into 4–12% gradient SDS PAGE gels (Invitrogen). After electrophoresis and transfer onto a PVDF membrane, immunoreactivity was detected by ECL (Thermo Scientific) and imaged using an iBright (Thermo Fisher Scientific). ImageJ was used to quantify band intensity [25 (link)]. For Endoglycosidase H assay, lysates were separated into three reactions containing: negative control (NT), EndoH (E) (NEB P0702L), or PNGaseF (P) (NEB P0704L) [25 (link)]. After a 3-h incubation at 37 °C, samples were loaded on SDS PAGE gels as indicated above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ubiquitination of Transcription Factor SF-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells were plated in 6-well plates and then incubated with Flag-tagged SF-1 and HA-tagged ubiquitin. One day after transfection, cells were treated with MG132 at 25 μM for 6 hours in the presence or absence of serum. Cells were harvested in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail and 1× phosphatease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) and centrifuged at maximum speed for 20 min at 4 °C. Equal amounts of total protein were incubated with 2 μl anti-SF-1 specific antiserum12 (link) overnight at 4 °C and then added to a protein G-Sepharose bead slurry for 2 hours at 4 °C. The final immune complexes were analyzed by Western blot.
For Western blots, proteins were resolved on 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to Nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Target proteins were detected using anti-SF-112 (link), anti-HA (F-7) or anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Flag, anti-GFP or anti-Actin (Sigma), or anti-phospho-AKT (S473, Cell Signaling) antibodies. The immune complexes were visualized with an Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Pierce) or an Odyssey IR imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard Western blotting procedures were used. In brief, cells were lysed with ice-cold RIPA buffer (Boston BioProducts) in the presence of 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM NaF, and 1 mM Na3VO4. Total cell lysates were mixed with 2× SDS loading buffer and boiled at 95°C for 10 min. Protein samples (10–100 µg) were then loaded and separated on 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked for 1 h with 1% BSA in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween20 and incubated with antibodies against GFP (1:10,000; Covance), Lamp1 (1:1,000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), EEA1 (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and Complex II (1:1,000; Abcam). Bound antibodies were detected using HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (65-6120) or anti-mouse (62-6520) secondary antibodies (1:5,000; Invitrogen) and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare). Band intensities were quantified with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Purification Using Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Superdex 200 and Superdex 75 prepacked columns were obtained from GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, USA. The 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels were purchased from Invitrogen and Bradford’s reagent was obtained from Pierce. All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were isolated in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche) and separated on gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Life Technologies). Proteins were wet transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (0.45microns, BioRad) at 100V for 1h. Membranes were blocked in 5% BSA + TBST for 1h. Primary antibodies were diluted in 5% BSA + TBST and incubated, shaking, with the membranes overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies used in this study are listed in the key resources table. Fluorescent secondary antibodies compatible with Odyssey CLx (Li-Cor) were used for 2-color imaging of membranes. Image analysis was performed with ImageStudioLite (Li-Cor).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!