The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using fortessa facs machine

1

Isolation of Hepatic Mononuclear Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver samples were minced and pressed through a 70-μm cell strainer. Cell suspensions were washed once in RPMI-1640 medium and centrifuged at 2000 rpm, 4 °C for 5 min. The pellets were suspended with 40% Percoll solution in RPMI-1640 medium and overlaid on 70% Percoll solution in RPMI-1640 medium and centrifuged at 400 × g (up 6, down 0), 4 °C for 20 min. Hepatic mononuclear cells were obtained from the interphase. Single-cell suspensions were washed with FACS washing buffer (2% FBS, 0.1% NaN3 in PBS) once and incubated with fluorescence-conjugated antibodies against cell surface molecules for 30 min on ice in the presence of 2.4G2 monoclonal antibody to block FcγR binding. Isotype antibodies were included as negative controls. After washing with FACS buffer, cells were fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS and preserved at 4 ºC. Flow cytometry was performed using a Becton Dickinson FACS Fortessa machine (East Rutherford, NJ, USA) and data were analyzed using the FlowJo version 10. CD45-APC (30-F11, 103112), CD11b-PE-Cy7 (M1/70, 101216), Gr1-PE (RB6-8C5, 108408), F4/80-FITC (BM8, 123108), Ly6C-BV605 (HK1.4, 128036), Ly6G-BV421 (1A8, 127628), DR5-PE (MD5-1, 119906), and CD3-PERCP (17A2, 100218) were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage and Microglia Profiling in Hippocampus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to determine macrophage and microglia populations in single cell preparations of the hippocampus prepared in complete media; IMDM (GIBCO/Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA), 10% FCS, and P/S on ice. Samples were stained with an antibody mix (MACS buffer +1% inactivated Rat serum, 1% α-FcγII/III (clone 2.4G2), α-F4/80 (clone GK1.5; BD PharmingenTM, FITC), and α-Iba1 (clone GR106078-1; Abcam®, FITC) for 30 min on ice, and then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde before permeabilization (0.5 g saponin, 0.055 g CaCl2, 0.0625 g MgSO4, 0.25 g NaN3, 0.5 g BSA, 10 mM HEPES in final volume of 500 ml of 1X PBS) for 1 hour at 4 °C. Intracellular staining of samples was done with an antibody mix (MACS buffer +2% inactivated Rat serum, 2% α-FcγII/III (clone 2.4G2), α-IL-1α (clone ALF-161; BioLegend®, PE); α-IL-6 (Lot 99523; BP PharmingenTM, PE); α-iNOS2 (clone Sc651; Santa Cruz Biotechnology®), α-MHCII (clone M5/114.15.2; eBioscience®, AlexaFluor 700), α-IL-4 (clone 11B11; eBioscience®, APC); α-IL-13 (clone eBio13A; eBioscience®, PE Cy7); and α-Arginase1 (clone H1010; Santa Cruz Biotechnology®) for 30 min on ice and read by a Becton Dickinson FACS FORTESSA machine (BD San Diego, CA). Data was analyzed by FlowJo© Treestar (Ashland, OR) and graphed with GraphPad Prism® software. Unless otherwise stated, antibodies were from BD PharmingenTM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were washed once with FACS washing buffer (2% FBS and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS). Cells were then incubated with fluorescence-conjugated antibodies against cell surface molecules for 30 min on ice. PERCP-CY5.5 antimouse CD45 (Cat# 103131, clone 30-F11), PE antimouse Ter119 (Cat# 116207, clone TER-119), Brilliant Violet 510 antimouse CD11b (Cat#101263, clone M1/70), Brilliant Violet 421 antimouse CD11c (Cat#117330, clone N418), APC-Cyanine7 antimouse Ly6G (Cat# 108424, clone RB6-8C5), and Brilliant Violet 605 antimouse Ly6C (Cat# 108440, clone HK1.4) were purchased from BioLegend. To determine cell viability, a LIVE/DEAD Fixable Green Dead Cell Stain Kit (Cat# L34970, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing with FACS buffer, the cells were fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS and preserved at 4 °C. Flow cytometry was performed using a Becton Dickinson FACS Fortessa machine (East Rutherford, NJ, United States) and the data were analyzed using the FlowJo version 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric B and T Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies comprising the B cell antibody panel were used: B220-V500, CD19-PerCP Cy5.5, CD23-PE, CD21-APC, CD24-PECy7, CD86-V450, MHCII-FITC, and IgM-Biotin (BD Bioscience, Erembodegem, Belgium). T cells panel consisted of the following antibodies: CD4-PerCP, CD3-AlexaFluor 700, CD62L-V500, CD44-FITC, CD28-PE, and CXCR5-V450 (BD Bioscience, Erembodegem, Belgium). Cells were acquired on a FACS Fortessa machine (BD Immunocytometry system, San Jose, CA, USA) and data was analyzed using Flowjo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating hPSC-Derived Cells by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate HE differentiation by flow cytometric analysis, hPSC-derived cells were dissociated by incubation in 0.1% collagenase for 2 h followed by TypLE Express for 8 min. Cells were mechanically dissociated and resuspended in 2% v/v FBS in Hank's buffered saline solution (HF). The following antibodies (obtained from BD Biosciences unless otherwise specified) were used at indicated dilutions: CD34-APC (1:100); CD144-PE (4:100); CD144-V450 (4:100); CD43-PE (3:100); CD45-PE-CY7 (4:100); CD4-PE (1:50) or CD34-PE (1:50); CD5-PE/Cy7 (1:200); CD7-AF700 (1:200); CD43-APC (1:200); CD45-APC/eF780 (1:200, eBiosciences); Ckit-APC (1:100); and PE-KDR (1:50). Control samples were prepared by incubating duplicate cell samples with respective fluorochome-labelled isotype antibodies. Samples were incubated with antibodies for 35 min on ice and then washed three times in cold HF. Viability discrimination was performed simultaneously using the viability stain 7-amino-actinomycin D at 1 μl ml−1 (Molecular Probes). Samples were analysed on a Becton Dickinson FACS Fortessa machine using BD FACS Diva Software. Cells were sorted using a FACS Aria (BD Bioscience) cell sorter (Donnelly Centre for Cellular & Biomolecular Research).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Profiling of B and T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies comprising the B cells antibody panel were used: B220-V500 (RA36B2), CD19-PerCP Cy5.5 (ID3), CD23-PE (B3B4), CD21-APC (7G6), CD24-PECy7 (M1/69), CD80-V450 (19-10A1), MHCII-FITC (2G9) and IgM-Biotin (RMM-1) (BD Bioscience, Erembodegem, Belgium). T cells panel consisted of the following antibodies: CD4-PerCP (RM4-5), CD62L-V500 (MEL-14), CD44-FITC (IM7), CD28-PE (37.51), CXCR5-V450 (2G8) and CD278-Biotin (7E.17G9) (BD Bioscience, Erembodegem, Belgium). Cells were acquired on a FACS Fortessa machine (BD Immunocytometry system, San Jose, CA, USA) and data was analyzed using Flowjo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Erythroid Cell Apoptosis Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained with APC-conjugated rat anti–mouse TER119 (clone: Ter119, Biolegend) and PE conjugated rat anti-mouse CD71 (clone: RI7217, Biolegend) on ice for 30 minutes (min) in the dark. The cells were washed twice, followed by staining with fixable viability DAPI (0.25 μg/106 cells) and analyzed within 1 hour (h) of staining. For apoptosis, cells were additionally stained for 15 min in the dark with 10 μL of Annexin V-FITC in 100 μL 1xbinding buffer.26 (link) Cells were washed and cell pellets were re-suspended in 500 μL 1xbinding buffer containing 5 μL of 7AAD and immediately analyzed by a BD FACS Fortessa machine. Apoptosis was also assessed using TUNEL assay by flow cytometry using APO-BrdU TUNEL assay kit (Invitrogen, A23210).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were stained for surface markers in PBS containing 0.1% sodium azide and 1% BSA for 30 min at 4 °C and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde. Data was acquired on a BD FACS Fortessa machine (BD Biosystems, UK). Forward scatter and side scatter gates were used to exclude debris and dead cells were excluded using a fixable near IR dead cell stain kit for 633 or 635 nm excitation. Cell types were characterized by their forward and side scatter profiles and by their phenotypes, as depicted in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunophenotyping of Neuroimmune Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to determine myeloid, macrophage, and microglia populations in single-cell preparations of the meninges, brainstem, hypothalamus, and thalamus in complete media: Iscove Modified Dulbecco Media (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 10% Fetal Calf Serum, penicillin/streptomycin on ice. Samples were stained with an Ab mix (MACS buffer plus 2% inactivated rat serum), 2% anti-FcγII/III (clone 2.4G2), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; BD HorizonTM), anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11; BD Pharmingen), anti-IL-13 (clone eBio13A; eBioscience), and IFN-γ (clone MG1.2; BD Pharmingen) for 45 min on ice, and then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde before being permeabilized (saponin containing permeabilization buffer) for 1 h, at 4 °C. Samples were read using a BD FACS Fortessa machine (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), and data analysed by FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) to be graphed with GraphPad Prism software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunophenotyping of Leukocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were stained with an Ab mix (MACS buffer plus 2% inactivated rat serum), 2% anti-FcγII/III (clone 2.4G2), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70; BD Horizon), and anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11; BD Pharmingen) for 45 min on ice, and then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Samples were read using a BD FACS Fortessa machine (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), and data analysed by FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) to be graphed with GraphPad Prism software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!