The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using z1 axioobserver

1

Visualizing Myonuclei and EB3 Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the movement of myonuclei, time-lapse 10X images were acquired using Z1-AxioObserver (Zeiss) with intervals of 15 min. Final videos were analyzed using Metamorph (Zeiss) and SkyPad plugin as described before (Cadot et al., 2014 (link)).
To analyze the dynamic of EB3, 50 stream acquisitions were obtained at 63X with 500 ms of intervals using Z1-AxioObserver (Zeiss). The movement and speed of each comet was further analyzed as described before (Sbalzarini and Koumoutsakos, 2005 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-modal Imaging of Neural Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of whole brain, spinal cord, and spine sections were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 slide scanner and a 10× objective. Higher-magnification images were acquired using a Zeiss Z1 Axio Observer inverted confocal spinning disk and a 20× objective, and, specifically for Figures 6 and 7, Leica Stellaris with white light laser and 20× objectives were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying AAV2-HBKO Striatal Tropism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four sections per animal, 440 μm apart, were used to quantify AAV2-HBKO tropism in the striatum when using a dose of 1.7 × 1013 GC/kg and MRIgFUS targeting the striatum. The sections were prepared from the same animals as used to quantify percentage of GFP-positive neurons. Z-stack images with step size 1 μm of sections stained with GFP, NeuN, GFAP, and DAPI were acquired using Zeiss Z1 Axio Observer inverted confocal spinning disk with a 20× objective. Costaining of DAPI- and GFP-positive cells with NeuN and GFAP was quantified manually using ImageJ (FIJI) in the MRIgFUS-targeted spots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Live cell TIRF and epifluorescence imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Live cell TIRF and epifluorescence imaging were performed on a Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver inverted fluorescence microscope with a TIRF slider using an alpha Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.46 Oil Corr M27 TIRF objective at 37 °C. Images were processed using Zeiss Zen Blue software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cellular Motility via Differential Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mature ALI transwells were removed from their media to glass-bottomed tissue culture dishes and imaged under 40X objective magnification with phase contrast optics at 30 frames per second for a total of 300 frames using a Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver inverted microscope. The resulting 8-bit monochrome videos were processed in ImageJ/FIJI as follows: each 300 frame stack was duplicated and a new 299 frame stack (the “difference stack”) generated by subtracting the (n+1)th frame from the nth frame. The mean of every pixel in the difference stack was then calculated and the resultant data output to a single TIF file visually representing the average pixel intensity change over the course of video, a surrogate for motion. This TIF file was pseudocolored using the “fire” lookup table to yield the final processed images. Data collected in a single experimental imaging session is displayed with identical brightness/contrast thresholds to allow direct visual comparison between experimental conditions. Source code for scripts available on request. For quantitation, mean intensity of TIF files were extracted in ImageJ, normalized per imaging session, and reported as relative intensity levels. Null hypothesis testing was performed using the 2-tailed Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescent Staining of KSHV Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The staining was performed as described previously (Hellert et al., 2013 (link)) with following changes: cells were washed and resuspended in PBS to a concentration of 0.5 × 106 cells/ml to 1 × 106 cells/ml and 10–15 μl of the cell suspension was dropped and allowed to dry on Superfrost/Plus slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A circle surrounding the dried cells was drawn with a hydrophobic pen (PAP PEN). The fixation with 4% PFA, quenching, permeabilization and blocking was performed as in Hellert et al. (2013) (link). Incubation with the primary antibodies (α-ORF59, Advanced Biotechnologies Inc. #13-211-100, dilution 1:100; α-LANA, NovocastraLiquidTM Mouse Monoclonal α-LANA NCL-L-HHV8-LNA, dilution 1:100), secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., CyTM 3-labeled Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG #715-165-150, dilution 1:200; and CyTM 5-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG #115-175-146, dilution 1:200) and washes were performed in 10% FCS in PBS + 0.2% Triton X-100. Slides were then washed with PBS, stained with DAPI (1 mg/ml, 1:1000) for 30 min at 37°C and mounted with MOVIOL containing DABCO (2.5%). Slides were dried overnight at room temperature in the dark and imaged the next day using the Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver using the Plan-Neofluar 20×/0.50 objective (ORF59) or the Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 Oil DIC M27 objective (kLANA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Chlamydial Infectious Progeny

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the production of infectious progeny, titer samples were thawed, vortexed and sonicated and then serially diluted for infection of a new monolayer of HeLa cells. After 40 h, coverslips were fixed with methanol and stained as in immunofluorescence assays to visualize chlamydial inclusions [57 (link)]. Inclusions were counted on three coverslips per sample using 200X magnification and a Zeiss Z1 Axio Observer inverted light and epifluorescence microscope. Data are expressed as the average inclusion forming units/mL +/- SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cellular Motility via Differential Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mature ALI transwells were removed from their media to glass-bottomed tissue culture dishes and imaged under 40X objective magnification with phase contrast optics at 30 frames per second for a total of 300 frames using a Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver inverted microscope. The resulting 8-bit monochrome videos were processed in ImageJ/FIJI as follows: each 300 frame stack was duplicated and a new 299 frame stack (the “difference stack”) generated by subtracting the (n+1)th frame from the nth frame. The mean of every pixel in the difference stack was then calculated and the resultant data output to a single TIF file visually representing the average pixel intensity change over the course of video, a surrogate for motion. This TIF file was pseudocolored using the “fire” lookup table to yield the final processed images. Data collected in a single experimental imaging session is displayed with identical brightness/contrast thresholds to allow direct visual comparison between experimental conditions. Source code for scripts available on request. For quantitation, mean intensity of TIF files were extracted in ImageJ, normalized per imaging session, and reported as relative intensity levels. Null hypothesis testing was performed using the 2-tailed Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualization of BirA-tagged Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were transfected with pLVX vectors containing MYC-tagged BirA, BirA-SMN, or BirA-SMNY109C using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. 24 h after transfection, BirA expression was induced using 1 µg/ml doxycycline. 24 h after induction, cells were fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 2% PFA. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton, diluted in 1× PBS and 3% NGS (normal goat serum), then incubated for 1 h with primary antibody and 1 h with secondary antibody. MYC-tagged BirA, BirA-SMN, and BirA-SMNY109C were detected using an α-MYC primary antibody diluted 1:500 (ab9106; Abcam). COILIN was detected using an α-COILIN diluted 1:1,000 (ab11822; Abcam). Endogenous SMN was detected using an α-SMN diluted 1:200 (610647; BD Biosciences). Highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibody AF488 α-rabbit was diluted 1:1,000 (A32731; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibody AF555 α-mouse was diluted 1:1,000 (A32727; Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA was stained using DAPI. Coverslips were mounted using Fluoromount-G (Invitrogen), and samples were observed using a Z1 Axio Observer (Zeiss) at 1,000X magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Mitochondrial Content in L6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondrial content was measured with Mitotracker Deep Red FM staining (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes Inc.). After differentiation and IL-15 treatments, live L6 muscle cells were incubated with Mitotracker Deep Red FM at 100 nM for 15 min in 1% FBS phenol red-free DMEM at 37°C before observations on the Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver with the 20X long working distance objective. For every condition, 3 pictures were taken in 2 different replicates (n=3 independent experiments) with consistent exposure times and randomly chosen fields of observation. Images were analyzed for quantification with ImageJ software. Images were analyzed by first establishing a threshold for each independent experiment. This threshold was maintained for the measure of the pixels within the threshold limit in each picture with the “analyse particles” menu of ImageJ software. The number of pixels representing the stained mitochondria was then normalized to the number of nuclei in each picture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!