The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using propylene oxide

1

Transmission Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were fixed in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3% glutaraldehyde. After washing in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), the samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) solved in 25 mM sucrose buffer (Merck) and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) for 10 min each. The last step was repeated three times. Subsequently, dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h, and finally, in pure Epon for 1 h. Epon polymerization was performed at 90 °C for 2 h. Finally, ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut with an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using a diamond knife (Diatome Ltd., Nidau, Switzerland) and picked up on Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both Science Services, Munich, Germany). Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope. Pictures were acquired at magnifications of 6000× to 100,000×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membranes were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Samples were washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), post-fixed in 1% OsO4 (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 25 mM sucrose buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min each. Last step was repeated 3 times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 90 °C for 2 h. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were picked up on Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano, Wetzlar, Germany). Contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS, Munich, Germany). Samples were examined using a TEM LEO 906 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), operating at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transmission Electron Microscopy Bacterial Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In preparation for TEM analysis, bacteria were fixed with 3% (vol/ vol) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) in PBS for at least 4 h, washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in 17% sucrose buffer. After fixation, bacteria were embedded in 2.5% agarose (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), then rinsed in 17% sucrose buffer and deionized water and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min each. The last step was repeated 3 times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 90°C for 2 h. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut by ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and picked up on Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano, Wetzlar, Germany). Contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS, Munich, Germany). Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of CFSC-2G Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron microscopic analysis of CFSC-2G cells was essentially conducted as described before [6 (link)]. In brief, cells were fixed in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3% glutaraldehyde, washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and fixed in a solution of 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) solved in 25 mM sucrose buffer (Merck). Fixed cells were dehydrated and subsequently incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva) and propylene oxide (1:1) and pure Epon. Finally, ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were prepared and packed upon Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both Science Services, Munich, Germany). The samples were analyzed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope and depicted images were taken at magnifications of 2156× to 35,970×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electron Microscopy Tissue Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For electron microscopy, small tissue pieces were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorensen’s phosphate buffer (PBS). Then, samples were washed in PBS, post-fixed in 1% OsO4 (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 25 mM sucrose buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) for 10 min each. The last step was repeated three times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h, and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 90 °C for 2 h. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS, Munich, Germany) to enhance the contrast. Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Agar scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) for at least 4 h, washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and embedded into 2.5% agarose (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). agarose cubes were rinsed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer. Post-fixation of cells was performed in 1% OsO4 in 17% sucrose buffer. After fixation, cells were washed in 17% sucrose buffer and deionized water and dehydrated by an ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min each and the last step thrice. The dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Sigma) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 37°C for 12 h and then 80°C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections (70-100nm) were cut with a diamond knife (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) by an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultradcut S, Leica) and picked up on Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano, Wetzlar, Germany). Negative staining by uranyl acetate and lead citrate (all EMS, Munich, Germany) was performed to enhance TEM contrast. The specimens were viewed using a Zeiss Leo-906 electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany), operated at an acceleration voltage of 60kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of Primary Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 x 106 primary WT PMCs or transformed PMC-306 were centrifuged and resuspended in 500 µl regular growth medium. For fixation, 3% glutaraldehyde dissolved in PBS was added for four hours. The subsequent steps for sample preparations and image acquisition were conducted by the Department of Electron Microscopy at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital Aachen. Briefly, the cells were embedded in 5% low-melting agarose (Sigma, #2070-OP), washed in phosphate buffer, post-fixed in 1% OsO4 (Roth, #8371.1) in 25 mM sucrose buffer and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min each. Last step was repeated 3 times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, #33715.01) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva, #21045.01) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1h and finally in pure Epon for 1h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon and polymerized at 37°C for 12 hours and at 80°C for 48 hours. Ultrathin sections (70-100 nm) were stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS, #22400, #17600) to enhance contrast. Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss) transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shortly after dissection, liver tissue was cut in small pieces (1–2 mm) and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 1× PBS. Samples were washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), post-fixed in 1% Osmium tetroxide (OsO4) (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 17% sucrose buffer (Merck) and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100%) for 10 min each. The last step was repeated 3 times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 90 °C for 2 h. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut with an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using a diamond knife (Diatome Ltd., Nidau, Switzerland) and picked up on Cu/Rh g (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both from EMS GmbH, Munich, Germany). Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) transmission electron microscope. Pictures were acquired in magnifications of 6000×, 10,000×, 27,000× and 60,000×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of Kidney Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kidney tissue was cut in small pieces and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Samples were washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck), post-fixed in 1% OsO4 (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 25 mM sucrose buffer (Merck) and dehydrated by ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min each. The last step was repeated 3 times. Dehydrated specimens were incubated in propylene oxide (Serva) for 30 min, in a mixture of Epon resin (Serva) and propylene oxide (1:1) for 1 h, and finally in pure Epon for 1 h. Samples were embedded in pure Epon. Epon polymerization was performed at 90 °C for 2 h. Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut by ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut S, Leica) with a diamond knife (Leica) and picked up on Cu/Rh grids (HR23 Maxtaform, Plano). The contrast was enhanced by staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS). Samples were examined using a Zeiss Leo 906 transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss) operating at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanoparticles and Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gd2O3 nanoparticles, Gd2O3-dex nanoparticles, and Gd2O3-dex-RB nanoparticles samples were prepared in UPW (Table 2). Nanoparticles in solution were allowed to adsorb on glow discharged formvar–carbon-coated nickel grids (Maxtaform, 200 mesh, Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) for 10 min. Adhesive drops were removed with filter paper. Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV using a Hitachi HT7800 (Hitachi, Düsseldorf, Germany) transmission electron microscope (TEM).
SK-MEL-28 and ASC were labeled (Table 1) and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer, scratched off from the tissue plate, and embedded in 5% low-melting agarose (Sigma-Aldrich). After post-fixation in 1% OsO4 (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 25 mM sucrose buffer, samples were dehydrated by ascending ethanol series, incubated in propylene oxide (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), and embedded in Epon (Serva). Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut and stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate (both EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) to enhance contrast. Samples were viewed at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV using a Zeiss Leo 906 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) TEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!