The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows version 15

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS for Windows version 15.0 is a statistical software package that provides data management, analysis, and presentation capabilities. It offers a range of analytical techniques, including descriptive statistics, regression, and multivariate analysis. The software is designed to work on the Windows operating system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

358 protocols using spss for windows version 15

1

Diagnostic Yield of ENB-Guided Biopsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was made with the use of a commercially available statistical package, SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as ratios. Categorical and discrete variables were compared using the chi-square (χ2) test. Diagnostic yield (%) = 100 × ENB-guided biopsy-diagnosed cases/total number of patients with completed procedures. Pearson correlation analysis was made to investigate the possible association between diagnosis and size or location of peripheral lesions. For statistical tests of association, P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predicting Biopsy Yield in Lung Nodules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was performed with a commercially available statistical package, SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0). Chi-square or rank sum tests were used to examine the association of patient’s age, sex, nodule side, shape, size, vertical (upper or lower), axial (inner1/3 or outer 2/3) distribution, characteristics (solid or ground glass), and ENB biopsy yield. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between nodule location (upper or lower lung), peripheral, or central and size (> or < than 21.5 mm) with the probability of a failed ENB (ENB non-diagnostic= “N”). A classification tree method was used to find an optimal cut-point for nodule size which indicated 21.5 mm being the strongest single value in predicting ENB failure. A significance level (P < 0.05) was applied for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics are presented as means ± standard deviation or percentages. Means were compared by unpaired t-test, and proportions were compared by Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Univariate analysis was used to identify different variables between treatment groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate factors that may have affected surgical outcomes (continence vs. incontinence) at follow-up. All calculated p values were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Effect of Compound X on Cellular Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as mean ± SD and compared among groups using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey post hoc test. SPSS for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Michigan, IL, USA) was performed for analyses of the data. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiovascular Disease Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics were represented as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and median (minimum–maximum) for continuous variables as appropriate. Distributions of variables were evaluated by one sample Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare continuous variables between groups. Categorical variables compared by chi-square tests.
Univariate survival analysis was performed to compare CVD-free period by the Kaplan–Meier method and the differences between survival curves were evaluated by using the log-rank test. The variables which had a statistically significant effect on Hazard Ratio were included in the Cox proportional hazard method as a multivariate analysis. The model was then reduced by using the backward elimination method and the best fitting models were reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Longitudinal Psychotic Symptom Dynamics in FEP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., 2010 ) was used to examine collected data. All tests were two-tailed. Their significance level was set at 0.05. As for repeated measures, the Wilcoxon test was performed to assess the 2-year longitudinal course of DS in the FEP total group. Linear regression analysis with DS as the dependent measure and Pr-EP intervention factors, clinical characteristics and sociodemographic features as independent measures, was also performed in our FEP population both at baseline and across the 2-year follow-up period. In longitudinal analyses, the differences (deltas [Δ]) between PANSS dimension scores at entry (T0) and at 1- or 2-year assessment time (T1/T2) as primary clinical parameters were specifically examined. - In line with what was suggested by Ver Hoef (2012) , the delta scores better define and qualify the temporal dynamics and longitudinal changes of psychotic psychopathology in comparison with T2, T1 and T0 single scores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Numerical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data obtained were recorded in a database prepared for the study. SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. D scriptive statistics were calculated for categorical variables as number and percentage. Numerical variables were represented with the mean, SD, minimum, and maximum. The statistical significance level was accepted as p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nonparametric Data Analysis in SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Mann-Whitney test to compare different groups (unpaired, non-parametric). A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values were expressed as means ± SE. To evaluate differences between the groups studied, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan post hoc test was used to compare the group means and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS for Windows (version 15.0) was used for the statistical analysis.
% improvement = treated mean - injured mean/control mean × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis for Gene and Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software, SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). For human skin data, significance of increase in gene or protein expression was calculated with a one-sample t-test, using 1 or 0 as reference values, respectively. For cyno skin data, significance of increase in gene and protein expression (relative to control condition) was computed using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed rank test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!