The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

158 protocols using su5000

1

Characterization of CE Copolymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The functional groups of the CE copolymers were identified using FTIR (NICOLET-6700, Thermo, New York, USA) in the range of 4000–500 cm−1. Thermogravimetry (SDT Q600) was carried out with a heating rate of 15 °C/min under N2 flow in the range of 25–600 °C). The morphology and composition of the samples were observed by SEM (HITACHI SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) and EDS (INCA MAX-50, Oxford Instrument Technology, Oxford, UK). XPS (ESCAL-AB-250XI, Thermo, New York, NY, USA) was used to further characterise the elemental composition of the samples and analyse the chemical state of the sample surface before and after adsorption. The crystal structures of the samples were determined using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Mini Flex 600, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). CE, lignin, and hemicellulose were measured using a cellulose analyser (ANKOM 220, Ankom, Qingdao, China) and the paradigm washing method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microstructural Analysis of Surimi Gels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surimi gels were cut into 3 mm × 3 mm × 1.5 mm pieces and fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5%, v/v) for 14 h at 4 °C. The fixed samples were rinsed with 0.1 M phosphoric acid buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) three times. After that, the samples were dehydrated with a serious of ethanol solution (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%) and then replaced with tert-butanol solution (absolute ethanol: tert-butanol = 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 0:1). The dehydrated samples were dried by using a freeze dryer (SCIENTZ-10N, Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China) and sputter-coated with gold. The microstructures were analyzed by an SEM instrument (Hitachi SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The handmade SE-ADM imaging system was attached to a field-emission SEM (SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech Corp, Japan) (Fig. 1A). The liquid sample holder was mounted onto the SEM stage and the detector terminal was connected to a pre-amplifier under the holder [13] (link), [14] (link). The electrical signal from the pre-amplifier was fed into the external input of SEM. The SEM images (1280 × 1020 pixels) were captured at 1000–20,000 × magnification with a scanning time of 40 s, a working distance of 7 mm, an EB acceleration voltage of 6–8 kV and a current of 1–10 pA. High-resolution SE-ADM images were processed from the LPF signal and scanning signal using the image-processing toolbox of MATLAB R2021a (Math Works Inc. Natick, MA, USA). The original SE-ADM images were filtered using a 2D Gaussian filter (GF) with a kernel size of 11 × 11 pixels and a radius of 1.2 s. Background subtraction was achieved by subtracting SE-ADM images from the filtered images using a broad GF (400 × 400 pixels, 200σ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized SEM Imaging of Deposited Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), deposited glass slides (Lab-Tek and Shell-vial 12 mm) were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M of sodium cacodylate buffer for 60 min. Slides were rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and distilled water for 1 minute each. Slides were dehydrated with increasing ethanol solutions (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%) for 2 minutes and with 100% ethanol for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with 100% ethanol/100% hexamethyldisilazane (HDMS) in a 1:2 ratio for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with 100% of HDMS for 5 minutes and air-dried for 30 min. We checked that no particles had been lost after this virus preparation (dehydration and drying) for SEM (not shown). Finally, the slides were platinum sputter-coated for 20 s at 10 mA (Hitachi MC1000). The observation was made using a SU5000 (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) SEM with an SE detector in high-vacuum mode at 1 kV acceleration voltage, observation mode (spot size 30). The working distance ranged between 1 mm and 5 mm. For quantification, automatic 6 × 6 mosaic tiled images at ×5k magnification were acquired at a random position with auto contrast/brightness using the microscope zig-zag function after manual adjustment of the focus and no further auto-focus. Pixel size was 3.96 nm. Images were 1280 × 960 pixels corresponding to 5078 × 3808 nm fields of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hygrothermal Aging Effects on Polymer Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were characterized using different techniques to determine their structure and morphology. Fracture sections of the specimens before and after they underwent hygrothermal aging were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU5000 type, Hitachi High-Technologies, Kyoto, Japan). For the SEM, the specimens were place in liquid nitrogen, taken out, and quenched quickly. Gold (SBC-12, KYKY, Beijing, China) was sprayed on the fracture, and the filler distribution in the specimens was observed.
For a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) using a DMA-8000 (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA), the specimens were cut into rectangles of 20 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm. The DMA experiments were conducted with the specimens before and after they underwent hygrothermal aging. This test was performed through a single cantilever beam experiment at a vibration frequency of 1 Hz and an amplitude of 0.05 mm. The heating rate was 5 °C/min, and the experimental temperature was −50~150 °C. Plots of the storage modulus and tanδ vs. temperature were recorded, and the Tg was obtained from the tanδ peak.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Composite Aerogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the chemical composition of composite aerogels, the materials were characterized by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) using Nicolet Nexus-670 (Nicolet Instrument Technologies, USA) over a scan range of 400–4000 cm−1. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded in the 2θ range of 10–90° by X-ray diffractometer (X'Pert Powder, Panalytical, Netherlands) with a Cu-Kα radiation. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mappings were collected by the field emission scanning electron microscope (SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech, Japan) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a JEOL JEM 2100 (Jeol, Japan). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectrums were detected by Axis Supra+ X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, UK). The thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on a thermogravimetric analyzer (TG209F3, NETZSCH, Germany) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from 40 to 800 °C under flowing nitrogen atmosphere. UV-vis absorption of the solutions was measured with UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-1900, Shimadzu, Japan). UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were obtained using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-2700, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an integration sphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Morphology Evaluation: CARB and Cu2+ Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effects of CARB and Cu2+ on bacterial morphology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. In this study, the MIC was 2 μg/mL of CARB and 1,600 μg/mL of Cu2+, and the inhibitory effect of biofilm was observed at sub-MIC that could not kill the bacteria. Thus, the concentrations used in this study were 1/4 MIC and 1/2 MIC. The prepared 2.5 mL samples (1/4, 1/2 MIC CARB, and Cu2+) were placed in 15 mL conical tubes containing 2.5 mL TSB of bacterial solution (~6 Log CFU/mL). Finally, they were mixed well using a vortex mixer and incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Afterwards bacterial suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g. The resultant pellets were mixed with 1 mL glutaraldehyde (2.5%) for overnight at 4°C, after which the bacterial were washed several times with PBS, sequentially dehydrated with 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% (v/v) ethanol, and 100% (v/v) ethanol was used twice for 10 min. The specimens were coated with gold for observation by SEM (SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscale Interactions of XG-Kaolinite under Humidity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study observed the microscale interactions between XG and kaolinite under dry and humid conditions, the relative humidity being 60% and 100%, respectively, using SEM (SU-5000, Hitachi High Technologies) and ESEM (Model Quattro ESEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, USA). Untreated and treated kaolinites—that is, mb/ms = 0, 1.0%—at w = 35% were air-dried for 24 h at 20 °C and attached to a 25-mm diameter SEM mount using carbon conductive tabs (PELCO Tabs; Ted Pella, Inc.). Before SEM observations, the specimens were osmium (OsO4)-coated for 10 s under a vacuum using a plasma coater (OPC-60A).
The ESEM, which controls the water vapor pressure (10–4000 Pa) and the relative humidity in its specimen chamber96 (link), was used to assess the variation of XG-treated kaolinite (mb/ms = 1%) using a change in the relative humidity. The samples (w = 35%) were initially attached to an ESEM mount, and the specimen surfaces were exposed to the electron beams thereafter. During the observations, the relative humidity fluctuated between 0 and 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacteria Sample Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for at least one hour. After fixation, bacteria were rinsed for one minute with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. Bacteria were gradually dehydrated with increasing ethanol concentrations: 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100% (one minute each). Bacteria were incubated for one minute in ethanol/hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Sigma Aldrich, USA) with a 1:2 ratio and finally incubated in pure HMDS. Between all previous steps, cells were gently stirred and centrifuged at 5000 rpm. Finally, 100 µL of each bacteria solution was centrifuged on a cytospin glass slide at 800 rpm for eight minutes. After deposition, bacteria were air-dried for five minutes and slides were platinum sputter-coated for 20 s at 10 mA (Hitachi MC1000). Observations were made using a SU5000 (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) SEM with Secondary-Electrons (SE) detector in high-vacuum mode at 1 kV acceleration voltage, observation mode (spot size 30).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated Melanosomes Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SE-ADM used in the current study is a handmade system. It was connected to a field-emission SEM (SU5000, Hitachi High-Tech Corp., Japan). A hand-made liquid sample holder was mounted into the SEM chamber, while the detector terminal was connected to a preamplifier under the holder (15, 16) . The preamplifier electrical signal was fed into the SEM external input. SEM images (1,280 × 1,020 pixels) were acquired at 2,000 to 20,000× magnification. Scanning time was set to 40 s, working distance to 7 mm, with an EB acceleration voltage of 6 to 10 kV and a current of 1 to 10 pA. High-resolution SE-ADM images were processed from the LPF signal and scanning signal using the image-processing toolbox of MATLAB R2021a (Math Works Inc.). The original SE-ADM images were filtered using a 2D Gaussian filter (GF) with a kernel size of 11 × 11 pixels and a radius of 1.2 s. Background subtraction was achieved by subtracting SE-ADM images from the filtered images using a broad GF (400 × 400 pixels, 200σ). Melanosomes in SE-ADM images were counted through Fiji-Image J "Particle Analysis" tool. Seven images per sample were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!