The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

494 protocols using prism version 7

1

Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Modulation in Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean Ϯ SE. Effects of HI and dobutamine treatment on ␤-AR receptor numbers and AR mRNA expression of the Sham, Sham ϩ DB, HI, and HI ϩ DB groups were detected using two-way ANOVA (GraphPad PRISM version 7.0) with Tukey multiple comparison test. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test (GraphPad PRISM version 7.0) was used to compare the effect of dobutamine and dopamine in the three animal groups exposed to HI (HI, HI ϩ DB, and HI ϩ DA). In instances where Barlett's test showed standard deviations of the groups to be significantly different, the nonparametric Kruskal & Wallis test was performed instead. Statistical significance was accepted for P Ͻ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chlamydia Vaginal Infection Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample sizes were determined a priori using a one‐tailed, proportions: inequality, two independent groups Fischer's exact test in g*power 3.1.7 software (Institute of Experimental Psychology, Dusseldorf, Germany). Significance is represented using the symbol *, with *P > .05, **P > .01 and ***P > .001. Significance between vaginal shedding was determined using Student t tests. The significance of the severity and incidence of hydrosalpinx was determined using Student t test and chi‐squared tests, respectively, performed using graphpad prism version 7 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). The total IFU/swab (the chlamydial infectious burden) was quantified, and the difference between groups analysed, as area under curve, using graphpad prism version 7. As area under curve assesses the bacterial burden, only infected groups are displayed, as the non‐infected control has a zero datapoint.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Techniques for Small Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between categorical variables. Exact conditional logistic regression analysis was used for the multivariate analysis (16 ). Bootstrapping was performed using random sampling with replacement to create a large number (N = 982) of “phantom samples” known as bootstrap samples. The sample summary is then computed on each of the bootstrap samples. This method can be superior to approaches relying on the asymptotic distribution of the tests that assumes the data come from a normal distribution, allowing the data of the sample study at hand to be utilized as a surrogate for a larger population. Although cross validation remains the preferred approach for validating predictive models, bootstrapping can be used when the sample size is too small to be split into a training and a validation set and/or there is no independent cross-validation cohort (17 (link)) (as is the case in our study).
All tests were 2-sided. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Fisher’s exact test was performed using Graph-Pad Prism version 7.0 (San Diego, CA, USA). Multivariate exact conditional logistic regression was performed with SAS software, version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA). Bootstrapping with multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with SPSS version 24.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were plotted using GraphPad Prism Version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States) and analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Univariate scatterplots displaying parametric data were present as mean and SD (Weissgerber et al., 2015 (link)). One-way ANOVA was used to test the significance of different treatments, and Tukey’s HSD test was performed for multiple comparisons to determine significant differences between the samples at 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001 significance levels. When the homogeneity of variance assumption was not met, differences were analyzed using Welch’s ANOVA and Games Howell post hoc test. Statistically significant differences between the groups at 0.05 significance level were determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test (homoscedastic) or unpaired Student’s t-test using Welch’s correction (heteroscedastic) of a two-tailed distribution (McDonald, 2014 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Cellulase Enzyme Specificity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specificity of BsGH7-3 was determined by measuring specific activity across a range of substrates, namely lichenan (MP Biomedicals, Ohio, USA), β-d-glucan from barley, Avicel PH-101, CMC (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA) and phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC). PASC was prepared following the protocol of Walseth et al. [44 ]. Activity was determined by incubating 1 µg of enzyme with 0.8% substrate (w/v) at 60 °C for 30 min in McIlvaine buffer pH 8.1 and then measuring the reducing sugar generated by DNS assay. The specific activity on CMC was considered to be 100% and the relative activity on other substrates was estimated. The Michaelis–Menten parameters of GH7-3 on CMC was measured between 0.5 and 18 mg mL−1 of CMC and determined by a non-linear regression fit of Michaelis–Menten equation using GraphPad PRISM version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fibrosis Stage and Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histologic fibrosis stage F3 was chosen as the categorical cut-off value based on previous studies correlating advanced fibrosis with CVD, HCC and death [4 –7 (link)]. Accordingly, participants with advanced fibrosis (F3) were compared to participants without advanced fibrosis (≤ F2). Standard univariate analysis was performed for categorical and continuous variables as appropriate using Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney U test, chi-square test or Fisher-exact test. Multivariable models were constructed using linear regression to assess factors related to relative VO2peak. Covariates that were deemed clinically significant or statistically significant with p value < 0.10 were included in the final model. Final variables included in the model were fibrosis stage, age in years, BMI, diabetes, female sex and NAS (steatosis was not included in the final model despite its statistical significance as it is a component of NAS). A p value of 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analysis was completed using SAS Version 9.4 (Cary, NC). Graphs were constructed with GraphPad Prism Version 7.0 (San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical differences among groups were examined using the unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s comparison test for the analysis of experiments with two groups or more than two groups, respectively, and are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). The time-point experiments were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 11.5 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Graph Pad Prism version 7.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Associated with Hospital Admission

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using GraphPad PRISM version 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and PASW Statistics version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results for categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables were expressed as mean values and standard deviations (SDs) or median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) when distribution was non-normal.
We used a generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic model with an exchangeable within-patient correlation structure and robust standard errors to account for individual patients with multiple exacerbations. The GEE logistic regression model was used to analyze factors associated with hospital admission. In the model we included all patient-related covariates that were judged a priori to be clinically relevant and those with a P-value <0.1. Correlations between pairs of predictors were examined to ensure the absence of multicollinearity in the model. Odds ratio and their confidence intervals were estimated with 95% confidence. For all GEE analyses, a univariate analysis was carried out first.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and Graphpad prism version 7.0 (GraphPad software Inc., USA). Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (minimum - maximum). The counting data were presented as count (percentage of total). Quantitative data were tested first with the Kolmogorov - Smirnov test for normality and Levene test for homogeneity of variance. The comparisons of paired and non-paired quantitative data were evaluated using Wilcoxon test and Mann-Whitney U test between two groups, and Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis test among multiple groups. Differences were considered significant at P < .05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) was used in the data presentation unless otherwise specified. The statistical significance of group differences was determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s analysis for comparison of multiple groups. The Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon’s test was used to compare the two groups, as appropriate. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 11.5 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), Graph Pad Prism version 7.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA), or stat package in R program, as appropriate. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Reports of statistical analysis performed in the figures are available in Supplementary Materials (Tables S1 and S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!