The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sybr safe

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, China, Denmark

SYBR Safe is a sensitive nucleic acid stain used for detecting DNA or RNA in agarose gels. It exhibits low toxicity and can be used in place of traditional ethidium bromide staining.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

589 protocols using sybr safe

1

DNA Origami Assembly with QD Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assemble Pep-biotin-streptavidin-QD655, pentagonal pyramid wireframe DNA origami objects with a biotin domain at the inner center or outer edge were incubated with Streptavidin QD655 (molar ratio was 1:4) at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture (15 μL) was then combined with 3 μL of 6× loading buffer (NEB) and loaded to a 0.8% agarose gel with 1× TAE and 12 mM MgCl2 and 1× SYBR Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Each gel was run at 65 V for 2 h in 1× TAE with 12 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C. Gels were then visualized under blue light. To assemble Pep-30 nt A*-QD630, pentagonal pyramid wireframe DNA origami objects with ps-backbone-based ssDNA wrapping domain at the inner center or outer edge were incubated with QD630 (molar ratio was 1:4 or 4:1) at room temperature overnight. The mixture (15 μL) was then combined with 3 μL of 6× loading buffer (NEB) and loaded to a 0.8% agarose gel with 1× TAE and 12 mM MgCl2 and 1× SYBR Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Each gel was run at 65 V for 1 h in 1× TAE with 12 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C. Gels were then visualized under blue light. All DNA sequences are summarized in Supplementary Tables 6 and 8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing DNA Nanostructures via Gel Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 2D DNA brick shapes, 2D origami and 3D origami were analysed by electrophoresis in a native 1.5% agarose gel supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2. Electrophoresis was performed at 90 V for 2 h in an ice-water bath. Gels were pre-stained with 1 × Sybr Safe (Life Technologies). The 3D DNA brick cuboid was analysed by electrophoresis in a native 1% agarose gel supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2. Electrophoresis was performed at 80 V for 2 h in an ice-water bath. Gels were pre-stained with 1 × Sybr Safe (Life Technologies). Afterwards, gels were scanned with a Typhoon FLA 9000 (General Electric) using the Sybr Safe channel (excitation at 473 nm, emission ≥510 nm).
Gel bands were visualized using a Safe Imager 2.0 Blue-Light Transilluminator (Invitrogen) and excised from the gel using a fresh razor blade. The excised piece was then placed into a Freeze ‘N Squeeze column (Bio-Rad) and crushed using a plastic pestle (USA Scientific). For the 2D DNA brick shapes, 2D origami rectangle and the 3D origami cuboid, structures were eluted from the column by centrifugation at 400g for 3 min. For the 3D DNA brick cuboid, structures were eluted from the column by centrifugation at 1,200g for 3 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LAMP Detection Using SYBR® Safe Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LAMP products were visually detected by two different methods: direct visual detection under UV light by staining DNA using SYBR® Safe DNA intercalating dye and agarose gel electrophoresis.
Direct visual detection using SYBR® Safe staining DNA: The SYBR® Safe (10 000X concentrate in DMSO, Life Technology, Denmark) was diluted 1:10, and 1 μl of diluted dye was added to each tube after LAMP reaction. The tubes were observed under UV light from a portable DR22 blue LED transilluminator (Supplementary Figure S1) (Clare Chemical Research, Inc., United States).
Gel electrophoresis detection: After LAMP reactions, 5 μl of each amplified LAMP product were loaded on 2% agarose gel containing 1X of SYBR® Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, United States). Gel electrophoresis was carried out at 100 volts for 60 min and the gel electrophoresis patterns were observed under Bio-Rad Gel Doc 2000 UV transilluminator (Bio-Rad Life Science, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

tRNA Expression Profiling by Northern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs (4 μg) from WT HEK293T and DTWD1/DTWD2 double-KO cells were dissolved by 10% denaturing PAGE, stained with SYBR safe (Invitrogen), and blotted onto a nylon membrane (Amersham Hybond N+; GE Healthcare) in 0.5 × TBE using a Transblot Turbo apparatus (Bio-Rad). Hybridization was performed essentially according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PerfectHyb; TOYOBO) at 42 °C with 2 pmol of 5′-32P-labeled oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 1) complementary to each target tRNA. The membrane was washed three times with 2 × SSC, dried, and exposed to an imaging plate (BAS-MS2040; Fujifilm). Radioactivity was visualized using an FLA-7000 imaging analyzer (Fujifilm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA-Protein Binding Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
0.5 μg of each DNA probe (Table S1) was individually mixed with 0, 0.1, 0.5, or 1 μM recombinant HsmR in binding buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.45 mM EDTA, 0.05% IGEPAL, and 10% glycerol) for 30 minutes at 37 ˚C before being loaded onto a Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN TGX PAGE gel (4–20% gradient) in tris-glycine buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine). Gel was run at 80 V for 30 minutes, followed by 130 V for 1 hour. Gel was rinsed briefly with water before staining with SYBR-safe (Invitrogen) for 5 minutes in tris-glycine buffer at room temperature in the dark. Gel was imaged using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Sexing Protocol for Pika

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological differences between male and female genitalia are poorly defined in pika (Duke, 1951); therefore, sex was determined using the molecular protocol described by Lamb, Robson, and Russello (2013). DNA was extracted from tissue samples using the Macherey‐Nagel NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey‐Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Duren, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocols. Sex was determined by the selective co‐amplification of an allosomal‐linked locus (SRY) and an autosomal control locus (Ocp 10). Scoring was conducted by running the PCR product on a 1.5% agarose gel containing 2.5% SYBR Safe (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To ensure accuracy, 50% of the samples were sexed independently a second time and assigned sexes were compared.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rep-PCR Fingerprinting for Bacterial Isolate Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Rep-PCR fingerprinting technique was used to differentiate isolates where several were recovered from the same water sample. Rep-PCR was performed using the BOX A1R primer (5′-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3′) according to methods described in Dombek et al. (2000 (link)). Template DNA was extracted with a Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Canada) from 1.5 mL of and overnight culture grown at 37°C in Tryptic Soy Broth. Five microliters of DNA template from each isolate was amplified in 25 μl reaction mixtures containing 12.5 μl Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen), 1.4 μM BOX A1R primer and 2.5 Q-solution. The PCR reaction was carried out in a thermal cycler (BioRad) programmed to provided 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 3 s, 92°C for 30 s, 50°C for 1 min and 65°C for 8 min, and a final extension step of 65°C for 8 min. PCR products were visualized in SYBR®; Safe (Invitrogen) stained 1.5% agarose gels following electrophoresis using 1X TAE buffer (BioRad) at 50 V for 900 min in a cold room at 4°C. After electrophoresis, the gel was further stained in SYBR® Safe in 1X TAE buffer (1:50 ratio) for 30 min with gentle agitation before imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We isolated genomic DNA using the ammonium acetate precipitation method [66 ]. We checked the integrity of the DNA using a 0.8% agarose gel stained with SYBRsafe (Invitrogen). We measured DNA concentration using either a fluorometer (FLUOstar OPTIMA) or Nanodrop ND800 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative PFGE Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Major chromosomal patterns were compared between WT and STM C. jejuni M1 DNA using PFGE. The RE SacII was chosen for DNA fragmentation as SalI, SmaI and KpnI (also used for PFGE of Campylobacter species)24 (link)25 (link)66 (link) all had recognition sequences within the Tn55 (link). The PFGE method used was based on those described in Rivoal et al. and Ribot et al.24 (link)25 (link). WT and STM C. jejuni M1 agar cultures, washed and diluted in PBS to an OD600 nm of 0.6–0.8, were preserved and lysed within plugs made with 2% low-melt agarose (Promega) in TE pH 8. Genomic DNA within the agarose plugs was digested with SacII for 5 h at 21 °C, washed in 0.5x TBE and resolved by gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose in 0.5x TBE. Electrophoresis was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions at 6 V/cm for 20 h with a ramped pulse of 5–50 s using CHEF-DR® II Pulsed Field Electrophoresis Systems (Bio-Rad) and connected to a LTD 20 cooling system (Hybaid). Gels were stained with 0.3x SYBR® Safe (Invitrogen) and imaged on a GelDocTM XR + (Bio-Rad) with Image Lab 3.0 software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Gene Expression in Chicken PGCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from each sample with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA quantity was determined by spectrophotometry at 260 nm, and 1 μg of each RNA sample was reverse-transcribed with the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). The cDNA was diluted five-fold and quantitatively equalized for PCR amplification. RT-PCR was conducted to examine the change in expression of candidate genes in cultured chicken PGCs using specific primer sets (Table 1). PCR amplification was performed as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 26–32 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 58–62 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The PCR products were mixed with SYBR® Safe (Invitrogen) and loaded for gel electrophoresis. Confirmation of the results was performed using the ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Downregulation of cell cycle- or germ cell-related genes at the mRNA level was analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Relative expression was calculated after the threshold cycle had been normalized to that of chicken glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!