The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman filter paper

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy, China, India, Germany

Whatman filter paper is a high-quality filtration product used in various laboratory applications. It is designed to efficiently separate solids from liquids, ensuring accurate and reliable results. The paper is available in a range of pore sizes and grades to accommodate different filtration needs. Whatman filter paper provides consistent performance and is a trusted solution for researchers and scientists.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

79 protocols using whatman filter paper

1

Malaria Prevalence along China-Myanmar Border

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, China. A total of 242 P. falciparum clinical samples were collected from malaria patients attending local hospitals along the China–Myanmar border during 2006–2011. These patients came from Laza, Nawei, Mangdong, and Nankajiang in Myanmar, and Tengchong, Yingjiang and Mengla in Yunnan Province, China (Fig. 1). All patients were diagnosed with P. falciparum infection by Giemsa-stained blood smears and microscope examination at the local hospitals, and further confirmed by a nested PCR [16 (link)]. Two hundred and fifty microlitres of finger-pricked blood was spotted on the 3 mm Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, USA), dried, and stored at 4 °C until further analysis.

Map of the China–Myanmar border region showing the sampling sites that indicated with red star. The map was prepared by using the website of https://map.baidu.com/

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Aortic Lipid Content Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid content in the aorta wall was assessed using ORO staining. The ORO solution was prepared by slowly dissolving 0.5 g ORO powder in 100 ml isopropanol while heating to 60°C and stirring until completely dissolved. The solution was then filtered twice using Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) and cooled prior to use. The aortas were immersed in ORO solution for 20 min, followed by 1 min in 70% ethanol. Subsequently, the aortas were rinsed with 60% ethanol for 2 min followed by distilled water for several minutes. Images of the staining were then captured (D750; Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcardial Gelatin Hydrogel Infusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In animals sacrificed at 14 days post-MCAO, 10 ml of a hand-warm (30 °C) 2% gelatin hydrogel containing 0.1% FITC-conjugated albumin, which had been filtered using Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Science, Little Charfont, U.K.) and was protected from light, was transcardially infused into the animals’ aorta immediately following PFA infusion. Brains were subsequently removed, post-fixed overnight at 4 °C in 4% PFA in 0.1 M PBS and dehydrated through a 30%, 60%, 80%, and 100% tetrahydrofuran (THF; Sigma-Aldrich) gradient [22 (link)]. Brain clearing was achieved with ethyl cinnamate (ECI; Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Malaria Falciparum Surveillance: DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples of patients infected with malaria falciparum were collected on Whatman™ filter paper (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp, NJ, USA) for routine chloroquine resistance surveillance [18 (link), 19 (link)]. DNA was extracted through a Chelex-100 based method [20 (link)]. A PCR method was used to confirm parasite species [3 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification and Characterization of Human C1q

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human C1q was purified, as previously described [20 (link)]. Briefly, fresh frozen human plasma (100 mL) was centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min, then passed through a Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, Hatfield, UK) to remove lipids. The plasma was then incubated with IgG-Sepharose (GE Healthcare, Hatfield, UK) for 2 h at room temperature (RT). The column was washed with a wash buffer (10 mM HEPES) and C1q was eluted using the elution buffer (100 mM CAPS, 1 M NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 11). The eluted C1q was applied to a Hi-Trap Protein G column to remove residual IgG, and the flowthrough was collected. Finally, the purified C1q was dialysed against a 0.1 M HEPES buffer, pH 7.5, quantified (yield ~ 2 mg), and examined via SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Figure S1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Olive Leaves Extraction and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The production of OLE was carried out as described in Conte et al. [26 (link)]. Briefly, after washing, the olive leaves were dried at 120 °C for 8 min in a ventilated oven (Argolab, Carpi, Italy) to reach a moisture content <1%, and then grounded with a blender (Waring-Commercial, Torrington, CT, USA). Milli-Q water was used as extraction solvent in a ratio 1/20 (w/v). The extraction process was ultrasound-assisted (CEIA, Viciomaggio, Italy) and the extract was filtered through Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy), freeze-dried (BUCHI, Flawil, Switzerland, LyovaporTM L-200), and stored at −20 °C.
The total phenol content was determined on the extract using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, the antioxidant activity was assessed by ABTS and DPPH assays as reported in Difonzo et al. [19 (link)]. The content in oleuropein was determined by HPLC-DAD and external calibration curve with the relative standard, as reported in Centrone et al. [27 (link)]. All determinations were performed in triplicate. After the extraction process, the OLE was freeze-dried and stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Olive Leaf Extract Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The olive leaf extract was produced according to Difonzo et al. [23 (link)]. The olive leaves were dried at 120 °C for 8 min in a ventilated oven (Argolab, Carpi, Italy) and grounded with a blender (Waring-Commercial, Torrington, CT, USA). Milli-Q water was used as extraction solvent in a ratio 1/20 (w/v). The extraction process was ultrasound-assisted (CEIA, Viciomaggio, Italy) and the extract was filtered through Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy), freeze-dried (BUCHI, Flawil, Switzerland, LyovaporTM L-200), and stored at −20 °C.
The OLE was characterized for total phenol content and antioxidant activity by Folin–Ciocalteu and ABTS assays (119 mg GAE/g and 687 µmol TE/g). The phenolic profile was determined according to Difonzo et al. [24 (link)] and the oleuropein content (85 mg/g) was determined by HPLC-DAD and external calibration curve with the relative standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction of Withania somnifera Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The roots powder was soaked in methanol (25 g/250 ml) for 24 h withheld in a gently shaking apparatus at room temperature for extraction. The extract was filtered with a Whatman filter paper (125 mm; 1441–125, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, UK) while excess solvent was allowed to evaporate under reduced pressure at 40 °C using a rotary vacuum evaporator. Following to determining the mean yield as a mass of the obtained extract per 100 g of W. somnifera roots, the filtrate was stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C and used throughout the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Corn Starch-Neusilin UFL2 Conjugate Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three methods were used in the formulation of the corn Starch-Neusilin UFL2 conjugate: physical, chemical, and microwave methods. The physical method involved simple mixing of corn starch and Neusilin UFL2 in the ratio 1 : 1. To ensure proper mixing tumbling method was used and the weighed starch and Neusilin were transferred into a beaker and the mouth of the beaker was closed ensuring that there is no spillage of the contents from the beaker while the mixing is carried out. The mixing was carried out for 15 minutes. In chemical method corn starch and Neusilin UFL2 were incorporated in the ratio 1 : 1. Corn starch was suspended in distilled water (q.s) and kept on magnetic stirrer at 270 rpm and temperature not more than 40°C. To this, solution of Neusilin UFL2 in NaOH (q.s) was gradually added with constant stirring. After 15–20 minutes the precipitated conjugate was filtered using Whatman filter paper (GE Healthcare UK Limited) having a pore size of 125 mm and dried in oven at a temperature not more than 50 ± 2°C. In microwave method physical mixture of corn starch and Neusilin UFL2 was subjected to microwave radiation at 590 watt for not more than 5 minutes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction of Bark from U. parvifolia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bark of U. parvifolia was obtained from National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science (Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea). U. parvifolia bark was grounded and extracted with 70% ethanol at 80°C for 3 h, filtered with Whatman™ filter paper (GE Healthcare, PA, USA), condensed in a rotary evaporator (Rotavapor® R-100; B.U.CHI Labortechnik, Switzerland), and lyophilized to obtain powdered extract. The powder was stored at −30°C for further use in experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!