The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

168 protocols using vario micro cube

1

Soil and Plant Nitrogen Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The whole rice growth period was divided into three soil sampling periods as follows: before the application of the tiller fertilizer, before the application of the spike fertilizer, and before harvest. Soil samples were sampled at 3-5 points using soil sampling tubes and then mixed and bagged. The samples were stored separately according to sampling depth and were categorized as wet and dry. Soil samples that needed to be air-dried were stored in a cool and ventilated place after natural air-drying, whereas fresh soil was stored at -80°C. Plant samples were collected only at harvest time. Further, plant samples from each device were cut flush, measured for wet weight, dried in a 70°C oven, cooled, weighed for dry weight, and finally crushed, ground, and stored in bags.
The TN content of soil was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method, and the nitrogen contents of both the soil and plant samples were measured using an elemental analyzer (Vario MICRO cube, Elementar, Germany). The alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content of soil was analyzed using the alkaline hydrolysis method. The NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations were analyzed using a continuous-flow analyzer (Skalar, Breda, the Netherlands) (Wang et al., 2021 (link)). The nitrogen content of the plant samples was measured using an elemental analyzer (Vario MICRO cube, Elementar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Elemental Analysis of Humic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Elemental analysis was carried out with a Vario Micro Cube Elementar instrument (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany). About 1mg dried humic acids was placed into the elemental analyzer to analyze the contents of C, H, N and O. The results were calculated as the molar ratios of C/N, C/H and O/C. The reference standards were acetanilide (C: 71.09%; N: 10.36%) and benzoic acid (H: 6.71%; O: 26.2%) to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. Each sample was measured three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Elemental Analysis of Copolymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The contents of the C, H, N and S atoms in the copolymers were determined by elemental analysis on a CHNS/O instrument Vario microcube Elementar GmbH (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Humic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The C, H, N, and S contents in humic acids were determined using Vario Micro Cube Elementar (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany); the O content was determined by the difference. All the experiments were performed in duplicates to confirm the accuracy of the data. An IR spectrometer (Varian 640-IR, American) was used to identify the organic functional groups in the HAs at ambient temperature. The humic acids and residual lignite samples (1 mg) were mixed with spectrometry grade dried KBr (100 mg) and then pressed into pellets under 10 MPa for 2 min. Spectra were recorded in the range 4000-400 cm -1 .
The phase composition of Na, K, Fe, N, P in humic acids was characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku MiniFlex II DESKTOP) equipped with Cu Kɑ radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) operating at 40 kV (tube voltage) and 140 mA (current). The samples were scanned in the range 10°-90° at a speed of 7°min -1 . The surface morphology of humic acids was visualized by a HITACHI-3500 N scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi Ltd, Japan). For observations by SEM, HA samples were dried in a desiccator and sputtered with platinum using a HITACHI E-1000 ion sputtering device. Elemental distribution of humic acids was accomplished by EDX spectroscopy. The samples were handled carefully to ensure that the HAs are not destroyed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals used in this work were obtained from suppliers and were used without purification. NMR spectra in solution were recorded by using a Bruker DPX 300 and 400 spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed with an Elementar Vario Micro Cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany). An air condenser (FindenserTM, SUPER air condenser, Radleys) was employed in the catalytic reactions instead of a water condenser. The infrared spectrum was recorded using with a Shimadzu 4300 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We dried and reweighed soil samples at 60 °C for 48 h to determine the moisture content. Soil pH was measured by pH meter 3151i (Xylem incorporation GmbH, Hessen, Made in Germany) in soil suspension with a ratio of 1:2.5 (w/v). Total carbon (Ctot) and nitrogen (Ntot) content were determined from 60 °C dried soil sample (8–10 mg) using an Elementar Vario Micro cube (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) and expressed in percentage. The carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio) was calculated by dividing Ctot with Ntot. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved nitrogen (DN) were analyzed by mixing soil: water in a 1:5 ratio (w/v) and shaking on an orbital shaker (150 rpm) for an hour and the filtered soil solution (10–15 mL) was used for LiquiTOCII (Elementar, Germany) and expressed in ug g−1 dry weight of soil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

NMR Spectroscopy and Elemental Analysis of Synthesized Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra in acetone-d6 were recorded with a Varian (Agilent) 400 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), internal standard was tetramethylsilane (TMS). Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm. Elemental analysis was performed on a CHNS analyzer “Elementar Vario MICRO cube” (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). The melting point was determined on a Boetius table. The progress of the reaction and the purity of the synthesized compound were monitored by TLC on ALUGRAM® SIL G UV254 plates (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany), and a hexane–ethyl acetate–acetone (2:2:1) mixture was the eluent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sediment Source Characterization for Tracing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sediment source samples were sieved to < 63 µm in the field to facilitate direct comparison to the target sediment samples29 (link),105 . Sediment source samples were air-dried and ground for further analysis (Fig. 6c). All sediment samples (sources and target) were analysed in the laboratory for their chemical properties, including total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) content21 ,106 (link) and major and minor elemental geochemical constituents32 (link),106 (link) as potential sediment tracers. For TC and TN concentration a sub-sample of 15 mg was wrapped in tin capsules and combusted in an elemental micro-analyser (Elementar vario MICRO Cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany) at 950 °C. A handheld XRF spectrometer (Bruker Tracer IV-SD, Bruker, Kennewick, WA USA) that uses energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) was employed to determine the following major elements: Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2 and trace elements: Ba, Cr, Cu, Mn2O3, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Y, Zn and Zr. For this analysis, a sub-sample of 500 mg was placed onto a thin film to measure trace elements at a setting of 40 kV and 15.7 µA and major elements at an excitation of 15 kV and 35 µA under vacuum with Helium gas. For each sample the mean of three replicates was used for further analysis (Fig. 6d).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stable Isotope Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
When necessary, samples were pre-acidified (HCl 1 M) to eliminate inorganic carbon, which can interfere with the δ 13 C signature (Carabel et al., 2006) (link). Un-acidified powder from each sample was also analysed in order to obtain the δ 15 N signature, which is known to be affected by HCl exposure (Carabel et al., 2006) (link). Then, samples underwent stable isotope analysis (SIA) by means of a continuous flow mass spectrometer (IsoPrime100, Isoprime Ltd., Cheadle Hulme, UK) coupled with an elemental analyser (Elementar Vario Micro-Cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany). Each sample was analysed in two replicates, and isotopic signatures were expressed in δ units (δ 13 C; δ 15 N) as the per mil (‰) difference with respect to standards: δX (‰) = [(Rsample -Rstandard)/Rstandard] x 10 3 , where X is 13 C or 15 N and R is the corresponding ratio of heavy to light isotopes ( 13 C/ 12 C or 15 N/ 14 N) (Post, 2002) (link). The reference materials used were the international Vienna PeeDee Belemnite (PDB) as a standard for carbon, and atmospheric nitrogen (N2) for nitrogen. Measurement errors were found to be typically smaller than 0.05‰. For δ 13 C, outputs were corrected for lipid content (Post et al., 2007) (link) based on the C/N ratio (not reported) of each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detailed Topographic and Edaphic Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A topographic survey was completed on a 20 m × 20 m grid within the 20-ha plot using an Electronic Total Station (Sokkia SET-4120). Three topographic variables, including mean elevation, mean convexity and mean slope, were calculated for each 20 m × 20 m quadrat [9 , 18 , 45 ]. These topographic data were used to do habitat classification. Mean elevation ranges from 304.2 m to 602.8 m, with nearly 300 m difference in elevation in the plot. Mean convexity ranges from -5.8 m to 6.9 m, and mean slope varies from 13.8° to 50.3°.
For edaphic variables, 1,292 soil samples covered the whole 20-ha plot at high resolution were collected by both regular and random sampling schemes (S1 Fig). The soil samples were air-dried for more than 30 days, and then were passed through a 0.149 mm sieve. Each sieved soil sample was divided into two subsamples. One subsample of 10 mg was used to analyze total C and total N by elemental analyzer (vario MICRO cube, Elementar, Germany). Another sub-sample of 350 mg was used to analyze total P using flow-injection autoanalyser (SAN++, Skalar, Netherlands). Soil pH of each soil sample was determined by Metterler Toledo pH meter (1:2, H20). For simulating heterogeneous environment in spatial point pattern analysis, standard block kriging was used to obtain three topographic and four soil variables for every 5 m × 5 m quadrat [46 , 47 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!