The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using dulbecco s mem medium

1

Isomeric Purity and Aldehyde Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isomeric purity of (Z)-4-undecenal (Z4-11Al) was 98.6%, according to gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (6890 GC and 5975 MS, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Isomeric purity of (Z)-4-nonenal (Z4-9Al) and (Z)-6-undecenal (Z6-11Al) were 97.4 and 96%, repectively. Chemical purity of these synthetic aldehydes was >99.9%. Ethanol (redistilled; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as solvent.
For the OR screening assays, the following chemicals were used: Dulbecco’s MEM medium (#F0435), FBS superior (#S0615), L-glutamine (#K0282), penicillin (10000 U/ml)/streptomycin (10000 μg/mL) (#A2212), trypsin/EDTA solution (#L2143) (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), CaCl2∗2H2O (#22322.295), D-glucose (#101174Y), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (#83673.230), HEPES (#441476L), potassium chloride (#26764.230), and sodium hydroxide (#28244.295) (VWR Chemicals BDH Prolabo, Leuven, Belgium), sodium chloride (#1064041000, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), ViaFect™ Transfection Reagent (#E4981, Promega, Walldorf, Germany), D-luciferin (beetle) monosodium salt (#E464X, Promega, Walldorf, Germany), Pluronic® PE 10500 (#500053867, BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), (R)-(−)-carvone (#W224908, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Odorant Screening in Cellular Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following chemicals were used: Dulbecco’s MEM medium (#F0435), FBS superior (#S0615), L-glutamine (#K0282), penicillin (100U/ml)/streptomycin (100U/ml) (#A2212), trypsin/EDTA solution (#L2143) (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), MEM non-essential amino acid solution (100x) (#M7145, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), Gibco® HAT supplement (#21060-017, Thermo Fisher, Dreieich, Germany),CaCl2*2H2O (#22322.295), D-glucose (#101174Y), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (#83673.230), HEPES (#441476L), potassium chloride (#26764.230), and sodium hydroxide (#28244.295) (VWR Chemicals BDH Prolabo, Leuven, Belgium), sodium chloride (#1064041000, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), D-luciferin (beetle) monosodium salt (#E464X), HaloTag® Alexa Fluor® 488 Ligand (#G1001, Promega, Madison, USA), Dynasore (#2897, Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK), Hoechst33342 (#1399, Invitrogen, Eugene, USA), Mowiol 4-88 (#0713, Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany), Paraformaldehyde (PFA) (#18814, Polysciences Inc., Warrington, USA).
Odorants were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), Alfa-Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Chemos GmbH (Regenstauf, Germany) (Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Odorant Receptor Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following chemicals were used: Dulbecco′s
MEM medium (#F0435), FBS superior (#S0615), l-glutamine (#K0282),
penicillin (10 000U/mL)/streptomycin (10 000U/mL) (#A2212), trypsin/EDTA
solution (#L2143) (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), calcium chloride dihydrate
(#22322.295), d-glucose (#101174Y), DMSO (#83673.230), HEPES
(#441476L), potassium chloride (#26764.230), and sodium hydroxide
(#28244.295) (VWR Chemicals BDH Prolabo, Leuven, Belgium), sodium
chloride (#1064041000, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), D-luciferin (beetle)
monosodium salt (#E464X, Promega, Madison, USA). The following odorants
were used: 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN; CAS: 30364–38–6)
(#ENAH97EDDC8E), 2-acetylnaphthalene (CAS: 93–08–3)
(#134775), and methyl isoeugenol (CAS: 93–16–3) (#W247618,
Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). The KFOs used were as previously
published39 (link),40 (link) (Table S1). Further
details including the GC–O approach for the purity testing
of the odorants prior to their use in the odorant receptor experiments
are available in the literature.41 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!