The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Poly a selection

Manufactured by Illumina

Poly(A) selection is a laboratory technique used to isolate and enrich messenger RNA (mRNA) from a mixed population of RNA molecules. The core function of this equipment is to selectively capture and purify the polyadenylated (poly(A)) tail present at the 3' end of mRNA, allowing for the separation of mRNA from other non-polyadenylated RNA species such as ribosomal RNA and transfer RNA.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using poly a selection

1

RNA Sequencing of Proliferating and Differentiated CPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from proliferating and differentiated CPCs using the RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California). Sequencing libraries were prepared according to Illumina RNA Seq library kit instructions with Poly(A) selection (Illumina, San Diego, California). Libraries were sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq2000 (2 × 100 bp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Profiling of HA-TgFBXL2 Parasites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HATgFBXL2 parasites were grown in the presence of ATC for either 24 or 48 h. HATgFBXL2 parasites growing in the absence of ATC were used as control. After ATC treatment, parasites were harvested from infected HFF monolayers by scraping and passage through a 27-gauge needle, centrifuged at 2000 × g for 8 min at room temperature, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, counted, pelleted and total RNA was extracted using SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega; Madison, WI).
Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer was used to determine the integrity, purity, and concentration of RNA samples. RNA integrity (RIN) score of 6.5 or above was considered acceptable for further analysis. Total RNA was enriched for mRNA using poly-(A)-selection (Illumina; San Diego, CA). NEB stranded RNA library prep kit (NEB) and NEB Ultra II RNA library prep kit (NEB) were used to prepare complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries for all HATgFBXL2 samples, according to manufacturer’s protocol. RNA sequencing was carried out on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina) with a mid-output 75-cycle paired end with 10–20 million reads per sample at the Genomics and Bioinformatics core facility at the University at Buffalo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA-Seq Analysis of Mouse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing library preparation was performed using TruSeq stranded mRNA library preparation kit with poly A selection (Illumina Inc.). Cluster generation and paired-end sequencing was performed 125 cycles in one lane by Illumina HiSeq system, executed by SNP&SEQ Technology Platform at Uppsala Biomedical Centre. Base calls were converted to fastq format. Trimmomatic command was used to remove TruSeq3 adaptors. Quality control was performed using multiQC (see: multiqc_report_afterTrimmingAdaptors.html for QC report). Trimmed reads were mapped to mm10 (mouse) reference genome and quantified using Salmon. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 (R package). An FDR adjusted threshold of 0.005 was used to discriminate significantly regulated proteins.
Samples were clustered using hierarchical dendrogram and principal component analysis (PCA; Extended Data Fig. 1-2). Whereas most samples clustered according to genotype, two samples (WT3 and KO5) extremely deviated from other samples and these outliers were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Allele-Specific Expression Analysis of Horse Liver Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our validation set consisted of short-read RNA-seq data from 66 liver samples, 41 males and 26 females, with no evidence of liver disease. These samples were comprised of 12 breeds including 27 Quarter Horses, 17 Warmbloods, 8 Thoroughbreds, 3 Andalusians, 3 Arabians, 2 Lusitanos, 1 Percheron, 1 Shire, 1 Ponys of the Americas, 1 Friesian, 1 Mustang, and 1 Gypsy Vanner. The average age of this cohort was 3.49 years and ranged from 1 month to 8 years of age. RNA-seq was performed with Illumina polyA-selection with a read length of 2 × 150bp. Adapter trimming, poly-A trimming, N trimming, quality trimming, length filtering, and removal of PCR duplicates were conducted using HTStream, version 1.3.3.26 Reads were aligned to EquCab.3.0 using STAR, version 2.7.10b.27 (link) Expression counts at identified ASE loci in liver were generated using SAMtools mpileup from SAMtools 1.18.24 (link) Loci that were not heterozygous were filtered out. We used the same significance criteria as our original cohort - aeFC ≥ 2 and adjusted p-value ≤ .05
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Sequencing of Proliferating and Differentiated CPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from proliferating and differentiated CPCs using the RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California). Sequencing libraries were prepared according to Illumina RNA Seq library kit instructions with Poly(A) selection (Illumina, San Diego, California). Libraries were sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq2000 (2 × 100 bp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome Profiling of Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty brains were used for each replicate (three biological replicates/condition). Brains were dissected and put into Trizol (Thermo Fischer Scientific). RNA was isolated using a standard Trizol protocol (Goodman et al., 2019 (link)). RNA was purified using RNA Clean & Concentrator Kit R10114 (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). RNA sequencing by Admera Health BioPharma Services (South Plainfield, NJ), using TruSeq Stranded mRNA Kit with PolyA selection (Illumina; San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!