The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

820 scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JEOL 820 is a scanning electron microscope that provides high-resolution imaging of samples. It uses a focused beam of electrons to scan the surface of a specimen, generating detailed images of the sample's topography and composition. The JEOL 820 is capable of magnifying specimens up to 200,000 times, enabling the observation of fine details and features at the microscopic level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using 820 scanning electron microscope

1

Mineral Composition Analysis via EMPA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EMPA of mineral compositions were determined using a Cameca SX-100 electron microprobe, using energy-dispersive spectrometry at the University of Cambridge (15 kV, 10 nA; beam diameter 5 μm) with fayalite, rutile, corundum, periclase and pure Co, Ni, Mn, Cr, Zn and Cu standards (Supplementary Table 4). Spectra were collected with a PGT prism 2,000 ED detector and the data reduced with the PGT excalibur software. Back-scatter electron and secondary electron images were obtained using the JEOL 820 scanning electron microscope in the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and 1 nA beam current.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Pinopodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the presence of pinopodes in luminal epithelium, one part of the specimens was fixed in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight, The samples were washed twice in buffer containing sodium cacodylate and calcium chloride (pH 7.4) and once in distilled water. Thereafter, they were dehydrated, first in increasing concentrations of ethanol (70, 95, and 99.5%), and then in acetone, and dried in a critical point drier with carbon dioxide. The specimens were mounted on a specimen holder, coated with platinum, and examined using a JEOL 820 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Scanning electron micrographs of pinopodes were obtained from 10 randomly selected areas of each tissue specimen and were graded semiquantitatively. Based on the literature, pinopode coverage of the uterine endometrium can be scored as follows: 0 (absence of pinopodes), 1 (covering < 25% of the surface epithelium, few), 2 (covering 25–50% of the surface epithelium, moderate), or 3 (covering > 50% of the surface epithelium, abundant) [14 (link)]. A single score was assigned to the most representative photomicrograph of the 10 images obtained for each tissue specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Lens Fiber Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe interlocking protrusions along the narrow-sides of elongated fiber cells, freshly isolated lenses of wild-type and ephrin-A5−/− mice at various ages were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3 at room temperature for 48–72 h. Each lens was properly orientated and fractured with a needle or sharp razor blade to expose the longitudinal configuration of narrow-side fiber cells at the anterior, equatorial and posterior regions of the lens. Lens halves were then postfixed in 1% aqueous OsO4 for 1–2 h at room temperature, dehydrated in graded ethanol and dried in a Samdri-795 critical point dryer (Tousimis Inc., Rockville, MD). Lens halves were mounted on specimen stubs and coated with gold/palladium in a Hummer VII sputter coater (Anatech Inc., Union City, CA). Micrographs were taken with a JEOL 820 scanning electron microscope at 10 kV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, we also used “whole mount” preparations to observe interlocking protrusions along the broad sides of elongated cortical fiber cells (Lo et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Murine Lenses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight- and 24-month-old B6-albino wild-type lenses were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as previously described [50 (link), 61 (link), 62 (link)]. Briefly, freshly dissected lenses were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) at room temperature for 2–3 days. A sharp needle was used to bisect lenses along the visual axis, and lens halves were post-fixed in 1% aqueous OsO4 for 1 hour at room temperature. Samples were dehydrated using ethanol and were critical point dried in a Samdri-795 critical point dryer (Tousimis Inc., Rockville, MD). Lens halves were mounted and coated with gold/palladium in a Hummer 6.2 sputter coater (Anatech Inc., Union City, CA). Images were acquired with a JEOL 820 scanning electron microscope at 10 kV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Using the lens nucleus as a reference, images from different regions of the lens were compared between samples (i.e., comparable regions were located based on measurements from the center outward). At least four lenses from 2 different mice were examined for each age, and representative images are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!