The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using x ray diffractometer

1

Crystallinity Analysis of α-CD and BITC-α-CD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The physical states of α−CD and BITC−α−CD were examined by the X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The XRD machine was equipped with a Cu−Κα radiation source operating at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA. The 2θ scan range was set from 10° to 60°. The crystallinity index (CI) of the test film sample was calculated with the following Equation: CI (%)=Area of crystalline peaksArea of crystalline peaks + Area of amorphous peaks × 100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanocomposite Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphologies of the as-prepared nanocomposites were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM-T600F. The presence of functional groups was detected by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR, Perkin-Elmer FT-IR spectrophotometer coupled with UATR accessory) in the frequency range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 and Raman spectroscopy (WITEC Alpha 300 R) in the frequency range from 4000 to 200 cm−1 with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Prepared Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JEOL JSM-7600F) operated at an acceleration voltage of 5.0 kV combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was utilized to study the morphology and composition of the prepared films. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) spectra were recorded via Shimadzu FTIR spectrometer. Raman spectra were acquired by Alpha300 R microscopic confocal Raman spectrometer (WITec GmbH) using an excitation source of 532 nm. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected from Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å).
All the electrochemical measurements were conducted in a two-electrode symmetrical SC assembly on a potentiostat/galvanostat (Autolab 101) electrochemical workstation equipped with NOVA software. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were recorded in a potential window of 0 to 1 V at different scan rates (10 to 200 mV s−1). The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) tests were conducted within the potential range of 0 to 1 V at current densities ranging from 0.5 to 5 A g−1. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data was collected within the frequency range of 10 mHz to 100 kHz with a sinusoidal perturbation amplitude of 5 mV at open circuit potential. All the experiments were carried out at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Electrode Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer was used for powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å) measurements. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4700) with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector was employed to characterize the sample surface morphologies. Field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM, Philips Tecnai, F20, 200 kV, Korea Basic Science Institute, Chonnam National University, Amsterdam, Netherlands) with selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) was used to study the structural morphologies and lattice fringes. The surface oxidation states of the electrode samples were determined through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo VG Scientific, MultiLab 2000, Chonnam Center for Research Facilities, Al Kα X-ray source, Waltham, MA, USA). The spectrometer was calibrated with respect to C 1s at 284.8 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Chitosan Nanoparticle Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A zetasizer (Particle Sizing Systems, Port Richey, FL, USA) was used to measure the particle size, PDI, and zeta potential of CSNPs and CSNP–SSL at 37 °C. Each measurement was repeated thrice, and the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Each sample was properly diluted with DW before testing. UV–vis spectrophotometer was used to assess optical characteristics (Model Perkin Elmer Lambda). The FTIR spectra were collected over a range of 400–4000 cm−1 using Perkin-Elmer (Spectrum-RX1, USA) FTIR spectroscopy. An X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used to conduct the XRD studies in 10–80° range using CuKα as the radiation source (k = 1.5418) produced at 30 kV and 30 mA. SEM was used to observe the morphologies of CSNPs and CSNP–SSL (SEM, Jeol FESEM JSM-7600F). TEM Images from a Tecnai F-12 JEOL-JEM 2100 TEM were captured at a 200 kV accelerating voltage. CSNPs and CSNP–SSL samples were homogeneously mixed with DW in an ultrasonic bath before being poured onto air-dried copper grids placed on filter paper and then dried at room temperature. The particle diameter size distribution versus frequency percentage of CSNPs and CSNP-SSL was calculated by measuring 50 particles with 100 m2/g specific surface area using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Crystallinity Analysis via XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the XRD technique was used to identify the crystallinity of the samples, which were then submitted to the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) through a Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu, Quioto, Japan), model XRD 7000, at room temperature, using copper’s Kα radiation (1.5418 Å), with an angular scan of 5° < 2θ < 45°, 40 kV tension, and 30 mA current [27 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Pt/BiVO4 Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proposed Pt/BiVO4 nanocomposite was determined using a transmission electron microscope for morphology and structure with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (TEM/EDS; JEM-2100F), and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; JEOL JSM-7500F) operated at 30 kV. Pt/BiVO4 was characterized to understand its crystal structure using a Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer at 1.5405 Å at 40 kV and 30 mA, supported by a vertical goniometer in the range of 10° to 80° (2theta) at a scan speed of 2 °/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of ZIF-8 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FT-IR spectra of the ZIF-8 nanoparticles and blend films were recorded at room temperature using IRAffinity-1 spectrometer (Bruker Corporation Blairica, Massachusetts, USA) attached to the universal ATR accessory over the wavenumber range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 and 2 cm−1 resolution. The films were mounted directly in the sample holder while the ZIF-8 nanoparticles were mixed with KBr powder where the pure KBr baseline was subtracted from the spectra. The XRD pattern of ZIF-8 nanoparticles were tested by X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a nickel-filtered Cu Kα radiation beam (40 mA and 40 kV). The analysis was scanned from 2θ = 3° to 50° with 1°/min scanning speed and 0.05° scan amplitude at ambient temperature. The Jade 6.0 XRD pattern processing software was utilized for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanofluorescent Sensor Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanofluorescent sensor was characterized by high resolution Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL). The XRD patterns were recorded using Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer with CuKα1 radiation (k = 1.54056 Å). The accelerating voltage of 40 kV and an emission current of 30 mA were used. The FT-IR spectra were recorded using JASCO-FT-IR 6800 spectrometer. The photoluminescence emission spectra were recorded at room temperature with a spectrofluorometer shimaduz RF5301PC. The luminescent lifetime of the prepared compounds was recorded using a PerkinElmer LS 55 luminescence spectrometer (USA). Surface charge of nanoparticles were calculated by Brookhaven zeta potential/particle size analyser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing β-Cyclodextrin Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An X-ray diffractometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to analyze β-CD, the physical mixture, and a-β-CD. The parameters were as follows: Cu target (40 kV, 40 mA), step scan: 0.02°/step, scan range 10°–80°, and scanning speed: 2°/min [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!