The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using cd4 cre

1

Conditional Knockout of Tcf7 in T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tcf7 conditional mice (Tcf7tm1a(EUCOMM)Wtsi, Institut Clinique de la Souris) were crossed to Flp Deleter (Taconic, 7089), and either CD4-Cre (Lee et al., 2001 (link)) or ERT2-Cre (Seibler et al., 2003 (link)) (Taconic) to generate Tcf7loxP/loxP; CD4-Cre (cKO) or Tcf7loxP/loxP; ERT2-Cre (iKO) mice, and to SMARTA transgenic mice, expressing a TCR recognizing the LCMV GP66-77 epitope (Oxenius et al., 1998 (link)). Blimp1-YFP mice (Fooksman et al., 2014 ) were crossed to SMARTA mice. Other mouse strains, in vitro activation, retroviral transduction, flow cytometry, microscopy, RNA and protein analyses, chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase assays are described in online supplemental material. For adoptive transfers, 106 (for day 1.5, 2, and 3) or 104 (for other timepoints) SMARTA CD4 T cells were transferred to recipient mice, unless indicated. Mice were intravenously (i.v.) injected with 2×106 (for day 1.5, 2, and 3) or 2×105 (for other timepoints) plaque-forming unit (PFU) of LCMV Armstrong. For ERT2-Cre inducible knockouts, 2mg tamoxifen in corn oil was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) daily for 3~5 d before LCMV infection. Controls were either Cre mice or mice transferred with ERT2-Cre SMARTA injected with Tamoxifen or ERT2-Cre+ animals injected with vehicle. All animal husbandry and experiments were approved by the NHGRI or NINDS Animal Use and Care Committees.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transgenic Mouse Models for Immunology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6J, B10.BR and RAG-1 KO (Rag1−/−) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). PAG KO (Pag1−/−) mice, PTPN22 KO (Ptpn22−/−) mice, Dok-1 KO (Dok1−/−) mice, mice carrying a conditional allele of SHIP-1 (Inpp5dfl/fl), and mice lacking c-Cbl and Cbl-b in T cells (Cblfl/fl; Cd4-Cre; Cblb−/−) have been described elsewhere (Davidson et al., 2003 (link); Kitaura et al., 2007 (link); Lindquist et al., 2011 (link); Tarasenko et al., 2007 (link); Yang and Seed, 2003 (link)). Mice expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of the CD4 promoter (Cd4-Cre) were from Taconic (Hudson, NY). Transgenic mice expressing class II MHC-restricted TCR OT-II or AND were also reported (Barnden et al., 1998 (link); Kaye et al., 1989 (link)). All mice were maintained in the C57BL/6 background. Littermates were used as controls in all experiments. Animal experimentation was done in accordance to the Canadian Council of Animal Care and approved by the IRCM Animal Care Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CD4 Allele Generation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cd4tm2Litt (Cd4(0.4k), Δ0.4kb) and Cd4tm1Yzo (Cd4(1.5k)F) alleles were described previously (11 (link), 13 (link)). These alleles were backcrossed 12 generations to the C57BL6 (B6) background before intercrossing or crossing to Cre transgenic lines. Cd4tm1Yzo was bred to Cd4-cre (Taconic) (14 (link)) to delete the 1.5 kb genomic fragment encompassing the silencer and DHS+3 (Δ1.5kb), or Vav1-cre (Jackson Laboratory) (15 (link)) for data shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. Mice homozygous for the Cd4tm2Litt or Cd4tm1Yzo were used all experiments. C57BL6 mice (National Cancer Institutes, Frederic, MD) were used as wild-type control. Bone marrow chimeras were generated by intravenous transfer of bone marrow cells (5 × 106 cells) into lethally irradiated B2m−/− mice (16 (link)) purchased from Jackson Laboratory. The recipient mice were treated with Trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole for four weeks and analyzed twelve weeks after transplantation. All mice were housed in a specific pathogen free animal facility at Washington University School of Medicine and experiments were performed according to a protocol approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University in St. Louis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Conditional T-cell MyD88 Knockout Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MyD88fl/fl (Jackson Labs) mice were crossed to CD4-cre+ mice (Taconic) (both on C57/B6 background) to produce the T-MyD88−/− (MyD88fl/fl-CD4cre+) mouse model. MyD88+/+-CD4-cre+ mice were used as wildtype (WT) controls for all comparisons. Germfree animals were on a C57Bl/6 background except when noted in the figure legend. Animal use adhered strictly to Federal guidelines and those set forth by the University of Utah’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic mouse models for immune research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT C57BL/6 mice were bred in house at UCSF. LATf/- and LATY136F mice crossed to ER-Cre (Chuck et al., 2010 (link); Markegard et al., 2011 (link)) and HDAC7 KO mice and HDAC7-ΔP mice (Kasler et al., 2012 (link); Kasler et al., 2011 (link)) have been described previously. Nur77-/- mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Irf4fl/fl (Jackson Labs) and CD4-Cre (Taconic Farms) mice were purchased and crossed. All mice used in experiments were between 8 and 14 weeks of age, and both males and females were analyzed. Mice were housed and treated in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines of the University of California, San Francisco (AN098375-03B for JPR and AN1110172-01 for EV) and Duke University (A160-14-06 for WZ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetically Modified Mice for Stat3 Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 and Rag1−/− mice were purchased from Harland Teklad. Cd4-Cre (Lee et al., 2001 (link)) mice were purchased from Taconic. Rorcgfp/+ (Eberl et al., 2004 (link)) mice were purchased from The Jackson Lab. Rorc-cre-Stat3fl/fl, Rorc-cre-Stat3fl/+, and Cd4-Cre-Stat3fl/fl mice were generated by crossing Stat3-floxed mice (Takeda et al., 1998 (link)) with Rorc-cre (Eberl and Littman, 2004 (link)) and Cd4-Cre transgenic mice, respectively. Rorc-cre-Stat3fl/flRorcgfp/+ mice were generated by crossing Rorc-cre-Stat3fl/fl mice with Rorcgfp/+ mice. All mice are on C57BL/6 background. Animal care and use were in accordance with institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines and all studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Chicago and Northwestern University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation of miR-210 Conditional Knockout Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mir210 conditional knockout mice have been generated as described previously33 (link). Briefly, Mir210f/f mice were generated by crossing miR-210 (lacZ-neor-flox) mice33 (link) with the actin-Flp deleter mouse strain (Jax) to delete the lacZ–neomycin-resistance cassette, followed by backcrossing to the C57BL/6 (Jax) background for more than 9 generations. The C57BL/6 (Jax), Cd28−/− (Jax), BoyJ (Taconic), CD45.1+CD45.2Rag2−/− (Taconic), CD4-Cre (Taconic), OTII (Taconic) and P14 TCR transgenic (Jax) mouse strains were purchased from the indicated vendors. Il2–/– D011.10 mice and Hif1af/f mice have been described previously50 (link), 51 (link). All mice were housed and bred in specific-pathogen-free conditions in the Animal Barrier Facility at the University of California, San Francisco. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, San Francisco.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Conditional Knockout Mouse Model Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6, Stat5fl/fl, and Il17agfp were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and Batf−/− (Batf KO) were previously described (Schraml et al, 2009 (link)). Cd4‐Cre were purchased from Taconic and bred to Stat5fl/fl to generate Stat5fl/flCd4‐Cre mice (Stat5 cKO). Littermates were used as wild‐type (WT) control mice. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen‐free conditions. All experiments were performed with the approval of the University of Alabama Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetically Engineered Mouse Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All mice used in this study were maintained in Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) facilities at Northwestern University. The mice were littermate controlled and were 6–10 weeks old unless otherwise indicated in the text. Ikzf1ΔF4/ΔF4, Ikzf1ΔF1/ΔF1, Ikzf1+/−, Rorcgfp/gfp, Ahr−/−, Stat3f/f mice were described previously(27 (link), 34 (link), 36 (link)–38 (link)) and were all fully backcrossed to C57BL/6 background. Cd4-cre and Rag1−/− mice were purchased from Taconic Farms or Jackson laboratory. All studies with mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwestern University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HSV-1-specific CD8+ T cell analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL6/J and C57BL6/JCD45.1, and CD8αKO mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). CD4-STAT3O mice were generated in house [13 (link)]. We derived mice with conditional deletion of Irf8 in T cells (IRF8KO) by breeding Irf8fl/fl mice with CD4-Cre (Taconic, Hudson, NY) mice. Littermate Irf8fl/fl mice on the C57BL/6J background, were used as wild type (WT) controls. Mice were maintained and used in accordance with NEI/NIH Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (Study # EY000262-19 & EY000372-14). For analysis of HSV-1-specific responses, the HSV-1 gB (498–505, SSIEFARL/PE) peptide used was synthesized and HPLC-purified by Invitrogen. H-2Kb HSV-1 gB-Tetramers were synthesized by NIH Tetramer facility, Emory Univ., Atlanta, GA. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Animal Care and Use Committee approved the study protocol used in studies described in this manuscript (ASP # NEI-697).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!