The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Delta model 707

Manufactured by Seca
Sourced in Germany

The Delta Model 707 is a laboratory equipment that serves as an analytical balance. It is designed to accurately measure the mass or weight of various samples with high precision.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using delta model 707

1

Anthropometric Measurements in Clinical Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes, socks, and headgear removed) using a stadiometer. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks, and bulky clothing removed) by using a single pair of electronic scales (Delta Model 707, Seca, Hamburg, Germany) that were calibrated using a known weight at the beginning of each clinic. Body mass index [BMI, weight (kg)/height (m2)] was also calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric and Physical Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with the subject’s shoes, socks, and bulky clothing removed), with a single pair of electronic scales (Delta Model 707; Seca, Munich, Germany) that were calibrated using a known weight at the beginning of each clinic session. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and socks removed) using a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Smoking was assessed by questionnaire and categorized as current smoker, past smoker or never smoked [32 (link)]. Physical activity was also assessed by a self-administered questionnaire that assessed the amount of time spent in light and strenuous physical activity on a five-point scale [33 (link)]. Participants were asked about the number of days during the last 14 days spent doing at least 20 minutes of strenuous exercise (that is, bicycling, brisk walking, jogging, aerobics, and so forth that was enough to raise your pulse rate or cause you to breathe faster) and light exercise (that is, walking, light housework, slow bicycling, and so forth that was not severe enough to cause a pulse rate rising or breathing increase). The participants then chose a score between 1 and 5, where score 1 represents no days, score 2 represents 1 or 2 days, score 3 represents 3 or 5 days, score 4 represents 6 or 8 days, and score 5 represents 9 days or more of exercise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Anthropometric Assessment and Knee Pain Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes, socks, and headgear removed) using a stadiometer. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks, and bulky clothing removed) by using a single pair of electronic scales (Delta Model 707, Seca, Hamburg, Germany) that were calibrated using a known weight at the beginning of each clinic. BMI (weight (kg)/height (m2)) was also calculated. Total body and trunk fat were measured by a Hologic dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner (Hologic Corp., Waltham, MA, USA).
The assessment of knee pain (on a flat surface, going up/down stairs, at night, sitting/lying, and standing upright) was self-administered, using the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) with a 10-point scale from 0 (no pain, stiffness, or functional problems) to 9 (most severe)
[14 (link)]. Each compartment of joint pain was summed to create a total pain score (0 to 45), and the presence of knee pain was defined as a total score or a subscale score ≥1
[15 (link),16 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with the subject’s shoes, socks, and bulky clothing removed), with a single pair of electronic scales (Delta Model 707; Seca, Munich, Germany) that were calibrated using a known weight at the beginning of each clinic session. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and socks removed) using a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anthropometric Measurements and Total Knee Replacement in OA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks and bulky clothing removed) using an electronic scale (Seca Delta Model 707). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and headgear removed) using a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m 2 ).
Data on the side, reason and date of TKR were extracted from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) 25 from 1 March 2002 to 21 September 2016, as previously described 26 . In this sample, all TKR procedures were performed due to OA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Baseline Health and Lifestyle Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Information on diagnosed medical conditions was obtained from baseline questionnaire.
Participants were asked to select any of the 10 conditions in the questionnaire: diabetes, heart attack, hypertension, thrombosis, asthma, bronchitis, osteoporosis, hyper-and hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, or "other illnesses". Heart attack included history of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1kg using a single pair of calibrated electronic scales (Seca Delta Model 707) and a stadiometer was used to measure height to the nearest 0.1cm. Both these measures were used to compute Body Mass Index (BMI)
[weight(kg)/height(m) 2 ]. Physical activity was measured as steps per day using pedometer (Omron HJ-003 and HJ-102; Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) [31] (link). Information about cigarette smoking status and presence of backpain was obtained from baseline questionnaire.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Anthropometric Measurements: Weight and Height

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks and bulky clothing removed) using a single pair of electronic scales (Seca Delta Model 707) calibrated using a known weight at the beginning of each clinic. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and socks removed) using a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m 2 ) was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Anthropometric Measurements Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthropometrics were measured at baseline, 2 and 10 years. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks and bulky clothing removed) using a single pair of electronic scales (Seca Delta Model 707) calibrated at the beginning of each clinic. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and socks removed) using a stadiometer. BMI (kg/m 2 ) was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Accurate BMI Measurement Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated (weight (in kilograms)/ height (in metres) 2 ) using weight measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (with shoes, socks, bulky clothing and headwear removed) using a single pair of calibrated electronic scales (Seca Delta Model 707), and height measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (with shoes and socks removed) using a stadiometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anthropometric Measurements Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (Seca Delta Model 707). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer 21 . BMI was calculated (kg/m 2 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!