The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Image lab software

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Japan, Portugal, Sweden, Czechia, Switzerland, Spain

Image Lab software is a data analysis tool designed for use with Bio-Rad's gel and blot imaging systems. The software provides a user-friendly interface for capturing, analyzing, and processing images of gels, blots, and other samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 749 protocols using image lab software

1

Purification and Analysis of miRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was used for the subsequent analysis of the isolated miRNAs. The aliquot of separated fractions was mixed 1:1 with a sample loading buffer (89 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, 7 M urea, 12% Ficoll, 0.01% xylene cyanole FF/bromphenol blue) and incubated for 4 min at 70 °C. All collected fractions were then loaded onto a 0.75 mm urea-polyacrylamide gel (20% gel with 8 M urea), and electrophoresis was performed with the Mini-Protean System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at a constant voltage of 180 V in a Tris-Borate-EDTA running buffer. The gels were stained with SYBR Green II RNA Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Stained gels were analyzed using the ChemiDoc XRS + System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), with subsequent data processing in ImageLab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Laemmli-SDS-PAGE electrophoresis with protein visualization by a silver staining method was used for the detection of protein residue in the samples of purified RNA [23 (link),24 (link)]. Stained gels were analyzed using the ChemiDoc XRS + System (Bio-Rad), with subsequent data processing in ImageLab software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NPCs were cultured in 12-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) and treated as indicated in the text. The cells were lysed directly in SDS sample buffer, sonicated, and denatured by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. The samples were then loaded onto 4–20% SDS/polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and electrophoresis was performed at 100 V for 2 h. This was followed by the transfer of protein onto a nitrocellulose membrane, blocking with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline Tween (TBS-T), and incubation with the indicated primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Anti-mouse or anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were added to the membrane for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were developed with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific), and imaged using the Chemidoc system and Imagelab software (BioRad). Densitometry analysis was conducted using the Imagelab software (BioRad) and all proteins were normalized to β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Quantification and Analysis via Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All out protein in HC-A cells after important transfection and treatment were removed utilizing RIPA lysis cushion (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The virtue of proteins was measured by the BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Appleton, WI). Western blotch framework was laid out utilizing a Bio-Rad Bis–Tris Gel framework (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Proteins in equivalent fixation were electrophoresed in PAGE-SDS and moved onto PDVF films (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Subsequent to impeding in the 5% obstructing cradle (Beyotime), the films were brooded with essential antibodies which were ready in 5% hindering support at a weakening of 1:1, 000. After hatching with essential antibodies at 4 °C short-term, the PDVF films were brooded with auxiliary immunizer for 1 h at room temperature. Signs of the groups were caught utilizing Bio-Rad ChemiDocTM XRS framework (Bio-Rad). The power of the groups was measured utilizing Image Lab™ Software (Bio-Rad). The intensity of the bands was quantified using Image Lab™ Software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed directly in SDS sample buffer, sonicated, denatured by heating at 95°C for 5 minutes, and loaded onto 4% to 20% SDS/polyacrylamide gels (Bio‐Rad). Electrophoresis was followed by protein transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes and incubation with the indicated primary antibodies for 2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. The membranes were then incubated with anti‐mouse or anti‐rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 hour. Membranes were developed with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and imaged using the Chemidoc system and Imagelab software (BioRad). Densitometry analysis was done using the Imagelab software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of PRMT5 in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed using the Invitrogen™ Western Devices Benchtop Bundle (Invitrogen™, Catalog #: IW3000S) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The primary antibody used for PRMT5 detection was the Invitrogen™ PRMT5 Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (ST51-06) (Invitrogen™, Catalog #: MA5-32160) at a 1:1000 dilution. The secondary antibody used for PRMT5 detection was the Invitrogen™ Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP (Invitrogen™, Catalog #: 31460) at a 1:5000 dilution. Beta-actin at a 1:5000 dilution, as well as the Invitrogen™ No-Stain™ Protein Labeling Reagent (Invitrogen™, Catalog #: A44449), were used for normalization as per the manufacturer’s protocol. A Bio-Rad™ ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System was used for blot imaging. The band intensities were quantified using Bio-Rad’s™ Image Lab software. Bio-Rad’s™ Image Lab software was also used for normalization by normalizing the quantified intensity of each band to the quantified intensity of its respective housekeeping protein (beta-actin) or total protein. Data analysis was performed by dividing the normalized band intensities of the CRC cell lines by the normalized band intensity of the control normal colon epithelial CCD 841 CoN cell line to arrive at the fold changes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating SL Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For experimental verification of SL protein interactions with transient overexpression, approximately 7.5 × 105 cells were lipofected with plasmids coding for Myc-DDK-tagged versions of putative interactors (Fxyd6 (Origene: RC210607), Bst2 (Origene: RC207540) and Tmed1 (Origene: RC200255)). Twenty-four hours later, cells were pulsed with 5 µM pacSph and UV irradiated, followed by click-chemistry-based coupling of biotin and pull-down. For experimental verification of endogenous SL–protein interactions, approximately 4 × 106 cells were used per sample.
For data analysis, band intensities (background corrected) were determined using the ImageLab software (Bio-Rad). For data analysis, band intensities (background corrected) were determined using the ImageLab software (Bio-Rad). Intensities from eluate bands were normalized to the intensities from the respective input band.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Protein Expression Levels via Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intensities of bands corresponding to the RBD proteins were measured using Gel Doc 2000 and Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in order to measure the protein expression levels. Briefly, the blots were acquired using the Gel Doc 2000 apparatus; the images were imported into Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA); the contrast was adjusted such that the bands were clearly visible on the blot image; the area around each band was selected; the background intensity was subtracted from the blot image; the bands were then selected by drawing a tight boundary around them; the intensities of the selected bands were exported in an excel file format, which was used to perform further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blotting Procedure for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting assay was carried out according to our previously published protocol (Li et al., 2017 (link); Zhao et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, the samples were heated at 99 °C for 5 min and loaded onto a 4–20% precast polyacrylamide gel (cat. no. 3450032, Bio-Rad Laboratories). The proteins were then electrophoretically transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (cat. no. #1620175, 0.2 μm, Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membranes were blocked with 3% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 2 h and then incubated overnight with the primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-nNOS (1:400, catalog number 610308, BD Transduction), mouse anti-PSD-95 (1:500, catalog number sc-32290, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:2,000, catalog number sc-25778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), respectively. The proteins were detected by goat peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse (1:3,000, catalog number 115-035-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch) or anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:3000, catalog number 111–035003, Jackson ImmunoResearch) and visualized by western peroxide reagent and luminol/enhancer reagent (catalog number 170–5060, Clarity Western ECL Substrate, Bio-Rad) and exposure using ChemiDoc XRS System with Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). The intensity of blots was quantified with densitometry using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Quantification of Oxidative Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples in different groups were lysed by radio immunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (RIPA; Beyotime, China) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Proteins of the same quantity (30 μg/lane) in each group were separated by 10% or 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA). Then, specimens were blocked by 10% skimmed milk in TBST at room temperature for 2 hours. Afterward, they were incubated with rabbit anti-SOD1 (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-SOD2 (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-PTEN (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-Phospho-Akt (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-Akt (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-Phospho-mTOR (1 : 1000, CST, USA), rabbit anti-mTOR (1 : 1000, CST, USA), mouse anti-GAPDH (1 : 1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), or mouse anti-β-actin (1 : 1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) antibodies overnight at 4°C. Secondary anti-mouse and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated antibodies (1 : 10000, Boster, Wuhan, China) were used to conjoin the primary antibodies at room temperature for 2 hours. Finally, blots were visualized by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) substrate (ThermoFisher, USA). Signals were detected by Image Lab™ software (Bio-Rad, California, USA) and analyzed by Image Lab™ software (Bio-Rad, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was lysed using RIPA lysate containing Protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Protein samples were separated by 10% or 15% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). Subsequently, 10% skim milk is sealed at room temperature for 2 h. Afterward, they were incubated with rabbit anti-Ferritin (1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-SOD1 (1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-SOD2 (1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-Itga3 (1:500, Boster), rabbit anti-Itgb1 (1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-Laminin (1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-E-cadherin (1:1000, CST), mouse anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Tublin (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Secondary anti-mouse and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibodies (1:10,000, Boster) were used to conjoin the primary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Finally, blots were visualized by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) substrate (ThermoFisher). Signals were detected by Image Lab™ software (Bio-Rad), and analyzed by Image Lab™ software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!